User talk:BirchHazel

June 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BirchHazel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have honestly admit the account listed above was operated by myself. However, since well over one year has passed since that account was blocked, and I have spent much time reflecting on why said account was blocked. Previously I had little to zero understanding of communication on wikipedia, such as talk pages and messaging other users, knowledge I possess now. And you cannot argue with honesty. I think these accounts pursued by other users are not about protecting wikipedia policy, but are in reality spiteful bullying to prevent me ever coming back, which is wrong. You cannot prevent anyone editing this site, as by definition anyone can edit it, but policy does not always match policy. All I want to do is edit articles related to things I love, and with good intentions too. Nothing is achieved by blocking someone who evidently wants to help wikipedia, especially when all talk is done behind a keyboard, it is in my opinion petty and not very intellectual either, particularly from someone who is not a vandal or seeks to ruin article content. I suffer from a great deal of stress daily and my mental health is often not great, so often using and writing on the internet helps me relieve this stress, so you can all be proud of denying equal rights to all editors. Anyone can edit this wikipedia, you can't stop them. Not happy and I wish to politely protest, this has made me really miserable, so thank you.

Decline reason:

Terribly sorry, you know. Can't unblock as you've not really addressed the issues leading to your block. Spiteful bullying? Er,no. Do please go back to your original account and address whatever issues led to you being in blocked at that time. Reread the GAB as it may help avoid common pitfalls.Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion

To follow up on my decline, you were blocked for edit warring and then went on to evade your block. At User_talk:StewieGriffin1998 you were advised to contact the WP:ARBCOM. You will need to appeal via your original account, to convince any reviewer you will not edit war anymore, and list all sock puppetry accounts you have used.Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]