User talk:Biomax20

Welcome!

Hello, Biomax20! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- Irn (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your draft

I moved your draft to Draft:RADA Special Deterrence Forces. If you want to skip the AFC process, feel free to move it again (with my apologies). If you do, please remove the AFC template from the bottom of the article. Thanks! Rebb ing 23:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RADA Special Deterrence Forces has been accepted

RADA Special Deterrence Forces, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 18:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Biomax20. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Biomax20. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tripoli Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epiphany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Boud. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Libya Observer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is the unsourced content that you inserted. Boud (talk) 13:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Libya Observer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This was your re-insertion of your personal essay. Boud (talk) 22:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wet market, you may be blocked from editing. — MarkH₂₁^talk 05:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MarkH21 I am contesting your claim about "disrupting editing." There was no distuptive editing. Obvious information was added. Biomax20 (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All content must be verifiable through reliable sources per Wikipedia’s policy on verifiability, and the burden is on the editor adding information to provide references. That’s what all three warnings on your talk page are about.

Also please use {{ping}} to notify editors, as using the @ symbol does not do anything. — MarkH₂₁^talk 07:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tripoli Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epiphany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Tripoli Airport.

Understand that verifiability is an English Wikipedia policy. You cannot continue to add unreferenced content, even if you think it is correct. Add your corrections with references to reliable sources. — MarkH₂₁^talk 07:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MarkH21 Can you please stop harassing me with your nonsense? I will complain. Biomax20 (talk) 16:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fathi Bashagha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GNA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanction Notification

Please stop the pov/pointy edits.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 23:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenFir: You have no right to dictate who or what discusses what in public forums. Whatever warning this is, is noted, and ignored.

"please stop with the pov/pointy edits" Excuse me? What about the other 300 like minded pointy pov editors allowed to share their POV eh? How about NO. i will not. Get off my page or ill report you. @EvergreenFir: Biomax20 (talk) 00:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello, I'm Boud. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boud (talk) 18:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Boud i may involve the IC3 Internet crimes complaint center, and may send a report to the British government and any relevant authority regarding the website. Please provide evidence of Libya observer company registry number and evidence for its registration in Libya. Thanks. This is beyond wikipedia, this website is a propaganda website and a highly controversial one, and has played a crucial role in disseminating information during the Libyan war since 2019 and 2020. Biomax20 (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Boud If you cannot provide this information ( specifically evidence ) from the Libyan chamber of commerce that this website is registered with company registry number as a valid, and licensed company, then i would like to ask you to kindly delete your article, or i may have to take this case with wikipedia staff directly. Thanks. Biomax20 (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is some misunderstanding here. I do not own any Wikipedia articles. There are also no such people as "Wikipedia staff". Please try reading the extensive information available about what Wikipedia is and how it works. After four years on Wikipedia, you really should re-read the basics.

Moreover, the email that you sent me stating I would like to ask you to provide the Chamber of Commerce registry number for www.LibyaObserver.Ly as a registered company in Libya. This information is publicly available. If not, i will take this case with a higher body on wikipedia and without wikipedia, as i mentioned earlier with IC3, British government and relevant authorities. is not very helpful. Boud (talk) 00:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Boud I am very well aware of what wikipedia is and how it functions. I challenged you to provide COC registry number for a 'entity' ( News company in this case ) that proves it is a legitimate registered company in Libya and not just some farce fake news website created elsewhere, so please provide this information, as you created the 'Libya Observer' article on wikipedia and engaged in Edit wars. And indeed, i will take whatever necessary steps to have your article either corrected with factual information, or removed if necessary ( if this information is not provided ). I am very serious. Biomax20 (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Boud (talk) 01:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lega threats

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 02:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail I specifically stated "i may involve the IC3 Internet crimes complaint center, and may send a report to the British government and any relevant authority regarding the website.", Not the user "Boud". I asked him and challenged him specifically to provide a Chamber of Commerce registry number, which is a publicly accessible to prove the validity of his article, which states that the website operates from within Tripoli, Libya. If you look at the edits, you can see that we had a edit battle. His claim is that the website operates from within Libya because "it states so on the website". The legal action may or may not be taken against the website. Not the wikipedia user. Thanks. I still stand by my request and challenge that he provides a chamber of commerce number or evidence that this news site is a legitimate registered company , or news source in Libya. Thanks. Biomax20 (talk) 07:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If he cannot provide that information, i informed him that i will seek whoever i can to have this article ammended or removed. And i still stand by my statement. Biomax20 (talk) 07:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You said on ANI you don't intend to take legal action against Wikipedia [1] "i did inform Boud that i would be taking some action ( And not against him or wikipedia )". But you say here you do intend to take legal action against Wikipedia, by reporting it to the IC3. The fact this may not directly affect the editor involved is fairly moot since you specific said "or wikipedia". No wonder people are confused. Nil Einne (talk) 08:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Here is a warning, a single warning. You need to start dealing with other editors in a more civil manner and calm down on the threats, rhetoric and general incivility. If you continue to edit Wikipedia and make comments along the lines that you are currently doing, you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 02:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will not retract from what i said in literal form, and stated: A: I challenged him to provide a Chamber of commerce number to back up his claims, which resulted in edit war, ( You can see for yourself that hes very adamant in citing information from the website, that the website operates from within Libya, which i and many others believe is false ).

B: I stated that i may or may not involve any relevant authority regarding the website, this does not involve Boud, or wikipedia, and dont intend to involve him or wikipedia in any reports anyway.

C: I believe i was pretty civil, considering the circumstances, since the website is involved in war propaganda and has caused political damage, and Boud ( in my honest legitimate belief ) is edit warring and reverting edits on the Article he made on Wikipedia, and the fact that i requested him to provide evidence for the legitimacy for the website in question and the fact that im prepared to take it up with any relevant wikipedia administrator to have the page ammended, or removed.

Instead of involving other editors or Administrators in this matter, perhaps Boud could concentrate his efforts on providing the chamber of commerce number for Libya observer and state it on the article to back up his cited source, and reinforce his claim, since i raised a issue stating that the website or company in question may, or may not be fraudulent. Thanks.

Biomax20 (talk) 07:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action and for not being here to build an encyclopedia.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You keep saying you don't intend to bring action against Wikipedia et.al. but then you keep making vague statements about taking action. Even if you truly mean you only intend to take legal action against some third party website, these comments still have a chilling effect on Wikipedia editing and at this point that is either deliberate or indistinguishable from deliberate. And regardless of these legal claims it's become very obvious you are here to right great wrongs instead of building an encyclopedia. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The following may be of interest to you: WP:SOCK, WP:BE, WP:RGW, WP:VNT. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]