User talk:BillyCarroway
Welcome!
[edit]
|
February 2022
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page A Case of You has been reverted.
Your edit here to A Case of You was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/release/15214274-Connie-Champagne-Imagine-Judy-Garland-An-Evening-With-Connie-Champagne) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Lavender Lounge
[edit]Hey BillyCarroway! I took a look at Draft:Lavender Lounge and it looks good, especially with the help provided by other users. I did want to clarify something that you mentioned in your first edit summary. Bearcat did not nominate the article for deletion because it was explicit, but because since 2007 it did not have information from reliable sources (something that looks a lot better this time). It was a different user named Explicit who closed that discussion (that's where Explicit came in. Without outing Bearcat, I know that they care about LGBTQ representation as much as the next person. Once it seems OK to Bearcat, I'll go ahead and accept it. Bkissin (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the info! I am learning how this all works. :)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lavender Lounge has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 14:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)AfC notification: User:BillyCarroway/sandbox has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent Calderwood has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)