User talk:Billinghurst/Archives/2013/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Billinghurst. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 30 October 2013
- Traffic report: 200 miles in 200 years
- In the media: Rand Paul plagiarizes Wikipedia?
- News and notes: Sex and drug tourism—Wikivoyage's soft underbelly?
- Featured content: Wrestling with featured content
- Recent research: User influence on site policies: Wikipedia vs. Facebook vs. Youtube
- WikiProject report: Special: Lessons from the dead and dying
The Signpost: 06 November 2013
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: Five years of work leads to 63-article featured topic
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Accessibility
- Arbitration report: Ebionites 3 case closed
- Discussion report: Sockpuppet investigations, VisualEditor, Wikidata's birthday, and more
The Signpost: 13 November 2013
- Traffic report: Google Doodlebugs bust the block
- Featured content: 1244 Chinese handscroll leads nine-strong picture contingent
- WikiProject report: The world of soap operas
- Discussion report: Commas, Draft namespace proposal, education updates, and more
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thank you for granting IPBE. العراقي (talk) 11:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC) |
- To clarify, it was not done as a local issue, but as a steward globally. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
User ip 111.243.34.140
Hi, please notice , this User ip 111.243.34.140 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/111.243.34.140 , Vandalism a lot of article, please stop it , thank you Buglerazedg21dnlole (talk) 12:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- I would direct you to your responsibilities about sockpuppets, and reversion editing. For both of you the place to discuss edits is the appropriate talk page, not to have a reversion war. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Urgent request for input on Jimbo's talk
Hi, your input is required urgently at User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 149#Why is the Arbitration Committee undeleting libel instead of oversighting it? Sceptre (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Why? I generally don't traverse Jimbo's page, nor participate in ArbCom business. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I see why. It would be more useful to say something along the lines of "You undertook some deletions (linked them)" and asked for the background rather than throwing me into the heat of a debate in which I have had no involvement, nor particular time to involve myself. You don't need my input or involvement, you just required the explanation of actions that I undertook.
I don't see WITH such a discussion is taking place on a user's talk page rather than in a request for comment area. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I see why. It would be more useful to say something along the lines of "You undertook some deletions (linked them)" and asked for the background rather than throwing me into the heat of a debate in which I have had no involvement, nor particular time to involve myself. You don't need my input or involvement, you just required the explanation of actions that I undertook.
The Signpost: 20 November 2013
- From the editor: The Signpost needs your help
- Featured content: Rockin' the featured pictures
- WikiProject report: Score! American football on Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Ill Winds
- Arbitration report: WMF opens the door for non-admin arbitrators