A tag has been placed on Rhythm Of Life (Shake It Down), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --OnoremDil11:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Keep giving your love to me, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 213:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sexy Lil' Thug Beyoncé song, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 213:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from an article. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Riana⁂12:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Agnieszka Włodarczyk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is in a foreign language. If you wish for Wikipedia to have this article, please log in or create an account in the Wikipedia of the language it's in.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Agnieszka Włodarczyk. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
A tag has been placed on Jak Oni śpiewają?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is in a foreign language. If you wish for Wikipedia to have this article, please log in or create an account in the Wikipedia of the language it's in.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Jak Oni śpiewają?. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Jak Oni śpiewają?, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- lucasbfrtalk09:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have now been blocked from editing en.wikipedia.org due to your persistently disruptive edits including inserting poorly written English into articles and repeatly breaking links. If you wish to contribute to the Wikipedia, please do so using your native language at pl.wikipedia.org. -- Netsnipe ► 09:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've lifted the indefinite block, as it wasn't warranted in this case; your editing, however, does often create problems, and if you want to avoid future blocks you should take much more care. As your English isn't very good at the moment, I'd suggest adding material to Talk pages first, so that other Users can comment on and correct any errors or other problems. Similarly, make sure that changes to links, for example, are correctly formatted, and that the results work.
If you do continue to edit disruptively, the next block will be for a week, and subsequent blocks will be of increasing duration; an indefinite block may ultimately be our only recourse. I hope, though, that you change your approach and make this unnecessary. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your first edits since being blocked aren't encouraging. You're recreated a deleted article, on a non-existent single, with no content but an infobox, and have made unhelpful edits to other articles. You are likely to be blocked again, and soon, if this continues. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please write in English; this is the English Wikipedia, and it is bad manners to use languages that most users won't understand. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jak Oni Śpiewają? Polish, by Mendors, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jak Oni Śpiewają? Polish seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jak Oni Śpiewają? Polish, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Jak Oni Śpiewają? Polish itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 209:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sexy Little Thug song, by Rackabello, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sexy Little Thug song is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sexy Little Thug song, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Sexy Little Thug song itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 216:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kobieta Szpieg, by Spellcast (talk·contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kobieta Szpieg is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kobieta Szpieg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Kobieta Szpieg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 211:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop what you are doing here. Your edits are messing up the layout of the tables on this page. In addition, you're adding notes into the columns of the tables which should not be there, and chart positions should also not be boldfaced (i.e. see prior note above about Rihanna's page). Thanks. - eo17:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do not add false information to articles, as you did to US5. This group has had no U.S. chart hits. Deliberately adding fake information to articles is considered vandalism. Thanks. - eo07:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Again, please stop adding unsourced information to these articles. Your formatting is also incorrect (for example, no chart positions should be boldfaced). Please look at the edit summaries that other editors are leaving. You're doing this repeatedly and your edits are now at the point of being disruptive. Thanks. - eo18:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Beyoncé Knowles discography, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. - eo18:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Beyoncé Knowles discography, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo13:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You've created a page titled The Blueprint2: The Gift & the Curse and the content in the article is for the song '03 Bonnie & Clyde. There is already an article for '03 Bonnie & Clyde and there is already an article for The Blueprint²: The Gift & the Curse. PLEASE STOP CREATING DUPLICATE ARTICLES. These edits are disruptive and other editors should not have to clean up after you. Please pay attention to the messages left on your Talk Page! Thanks. - eo14:13, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bijanse! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 708 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to In da Club. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --OnoremDil 11:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Realkyhick 09:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Co mi Panie dasz?, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Rackabello 13:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Beyoncé Knowles discography, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo 13:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
