User talk:Biharpro7252

Welcome!

Hello, Biharpro7252, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tarar,Bhagalpur, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Lopifalko (talk) 06:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tarar,Bhagalpur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tarar,Bhagalpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lopifalko (talk) 06:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article titles

Hi there, thank you for your edits. Please be mindful that all of your articles are created under the wrong title at the moment.

For example, Makarpur,Bhagalpur is wrong for two reasons. Firstly, if the 'Bhagalpur' is necessary at all, there should be a space after the comma, which is the correct English grammar. So it should be 'Makarpur, Bhagalpur' instead of 'Makarpur,Bhagalpur'.

Second problem is the 'Bhagalpur' is completely unnecessary since there is no article for Makarpur, we should use that title. Only add the second part if there is already another article about a town with the same name somewhere else. Note that we have Paris and not Paris, France for the same reason. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Biharpro7252 (talk) 17:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Biharpro7252. Thank you for your work on Dogachchhi. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

consider adding a source from the previous indian census

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dogachchhi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dogachchhi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Biharpro7252. Thank you for your work on Makarpur. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

consider adding a source from the previous indian census

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makarpur moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Makarpur. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Budhanath Temple.png

Thank you for uploading File:Budhanath Temple.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 18:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello this is fakeid for katihar

bro Tarar kahalgoan ma aata hai.kahalgoan mere native place hai Proverealbiharhistory (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say but it comes in Sonhaula Block of Bhagalpur. It can be a part of Kahalgaon Vidhansabha. Biharpro7252 (talk) 11:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ajgaibinath Temple.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ajgaibinath Temple.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Temples in Anga Region has been nominated for deletion

Category:Temples in Anga Region has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Alalch E. 11:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darbhanga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maithili. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Katihar. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 13:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Categories for discussion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Categories for discussion debates, as you did with Category:Villages in Anga Region. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of a category, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bokaro district. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Census doesn't recognise Angika language. Do not falsify census data. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Begusarai district, you may be blocked from editing. This falsification of census data from your part need to stop. Angika is isn't even reported in census. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:36, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Biharpro7252! Your additions to Budhanath temple have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 14:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me to improve this page

List the cities in anga region by population Proverealbiharhistory (talk) 06:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not remove Categories for discussion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Categories for discussion pages, as you did with Category:Villages in Anga Region. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Munger district. Stop vandalising census data and adding unsourced content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Anga (region), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mikeanand (talk) 15:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anga (region)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anga (region), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mikeanand (talk) 01:11, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anga (region)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anga (region) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anga area. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mikeanand (talk) 02:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anga (region) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anga (region) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anga (region) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mikeanand (talk) 05:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning without any source proof dont manipulate any of wiki pages Biharpro7252 (talk) 09:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — SamX [talk · contribs] 14:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anga (region), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Outlook.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anga (region) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anga (region) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anga (region) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mikeanand (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help me to get unblock. Keeping all controversies aside.You too know I made a number of pages on Temples,Villages which are an important part of our culture but unfortunately that pages are also deleted . I request you for the sake of religion plz revive those pages. Especially they belong to pilgrim tourism in Bhagalpur. Ajgaibinath Temple,Shiv Shakti Temple,Bhoothnath Temple,Maa Jaleshwari Temple @Mikeanand.This is only and last request I do. Biharpro7252 (talk) 09:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anga (region)

Hello, Biharpro7252,

I didn't make an "undiscussed page move". I moved this article to Draft space as the outcome of an AFD deletion decision which I closed. Doing this was to allow editors the opportunity to work on improving this article. But now that you insist on this article being in main space, I will not make that mistake again. I think you can expect a full deletion of this article because you could not accept working on this article in Draft space. Bad move on your part. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for my tone here but I was disappointed and angry at your behavior and edit summary. I usually don't scold like this but this was a bad decision to make which I was reacting to. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am banned on wiki for false claims of socketpuppetry ,I contributed to wiki via creating many pages.please help me for unblock. Biharpro7252 (talk) 16:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I promise that I will just help to improve. No more controversy. Biharpro7252 (talk) 16:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Biharpro7252 (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You redirected Draft:Anga (region) to Anga (region) with the edit summary "Revert undiscussed move". Undiscussed..? The AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anga (region), in which I can see you yourself took part, was closed as Draftify, with a comment by the closing admin Liz that "Content creators please be aware that if you move this back to main space, we'll likely have a quick return visit to AFD which might have a less gentle closure". You had created the article yourself, and your redirecting it back to mainspace with the specious argument that Liz's move was undiscussed, was obviously in bad faith. You have been blocked for 48 hours for disruptive editing. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Liz, I considered speedying the draft/article, but since there's already a second AfD and you are talking to Biharpro7252, I'll leave its fate to you. If you disapprove of my block, please let me know. Bishonen | tålk 18:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks, Bishonen. Biharpro7252, this is a brief block that I believe is meant to get your attention that you need to start changing your behavior. If, after the block, you return to the same stubborn editing style, insisting that your way is the only way, then you can expect to be blocked indefinitely. This project is a collaborative editing project which means that sometimes, we don't get our way or we have to alter our approach. Decisions are made by consensus. I moved the article to Draft space even though a good number of editors wanted it to be deleted because I thought you could work on it there. I know that this didn't please you but those editors who wanted the article deleted also didn't get what they wanted.

I hope when this block is over, you can return and contribute to articles on other subjects since the article you have focused on is now back for a 2nd AFD. I won't close this discussion but I don't think you can expect a second chance at draftification so it would help if you broadened your interested and found other articles that you could help improve. Consider this brief block an opportunity for a chance to start over on Wikipedia with a clean slate and to work more cooperatively with other editors, even ones you disagree with. Remember, if editors quit working here whenever they found themselves in a dispute with another editor, we'd have no one contributing to the project! As an adult, you have to find ways to work with those who you disagree with or you won't be an editor here for much longer. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok I consider this mam and I am too new to Wikipedia , I have to go through all the rules and regulations. I dont wanted to hurt anyone,but The alleged Mikeanand,Jaikichandan they all are from a specific political group and always target a specific language and page.I m sorry once again I should have submitted it as a draft for review. Biharpro7252 (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Temples in Anga Region

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Temples in Anga Region requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[1]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mikeanand (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Angika cuisine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Angika cuisine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.outlookindia.com/art-and-museums/each-dish-is-a-story-in-itself-news-290954. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mikeanand (talk) 14:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bihari folklore for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bihari folklore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bihari folklore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mikeanand (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Maa Jaleshwari Temple

Hello, Biharpro7252,

Thank you for creating Maa Jaleshwari Temple.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Facebook is an unreliable source, and Wikipedia itself cannot be used as a reliable source. So, please replace these sources with secondary, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 03:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am banned on wiki for false claims of socketpuppetry ,I contributed to wiki via creating many pages.please helpme for unblock. Biharpro7252 (talk) 16:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naugachhia and Anga

Hi, the citation you keep inserting into Naugachhia doesn't seem to support your claim it's part of "Anga". Please could you be more specific where you think the text supports that claim before re-inserting? BrigadierG (talk) 15:26, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As per various historians and geologists , Anga is a region comprising Bhagalpur divison and Munger division with parts of south eastern Purnia division and so on Souce-: .Masica, Colin P. (1993) Biharpro7252 (talk) 01:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source you cite is a 600 page book. Could you provide a more specific reference and perhaps an excerpt? BrigadierG (talk) 18:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dogachchhi (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dogachchhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Makarpur (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Makarpur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Makarpur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makarpur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makarpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BrigadierG (talk) 14:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know @Mera Awaaz you dont have a proof against me, unblock me immediately .I am not a socketpupper Biharpro7252 (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biharpro7252 (talk) 16:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biharpro7252 (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]