User talk:BiblioJordan
Welcome!
|
BLP Warning
[edit]Regarding Neoliberalism. Please read WP:BLP. it says Material about living persons added to any Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research..... Contentious material about living persons ...that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing. and Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that: is ...a conjectural interpretation of a source You admit your source does NOT say it, that's it's your own reading between the lines. Note that no other major RS makes any such allegation. Your source is a polemic all about Hillary with ONE sentence dealing with Neoliberalism and that sentence does NOT refer to Hillary. hence "poorly sourced" and "a conjectural interpretation" Rjensen (talk) 16:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
[edit]The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Neoliberalism". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 23 June 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 03:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
[edit]The request for formal mediation concerning Neoliberalism, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
June 2016
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Some friendly advice
[edit]I'm going to assume you are telling the truth on ANI that you are not someone's sock, and give you a few pieces of advice, following which might encourage others not to see you as a WP:SPA.
Move on with your life.
Edit some other pages.
Avoid political topics.
And, FTLOG, learn to indent your replies.
Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 09:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I know some people on here object to my political views, and I take that to be the main reason for all the objections to my edits. BiblioJordan (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Some more advice: stop assuming bad faith. You have given the community a bunch of reasons to be suspicious of you, and claiming that everyone is trying to persecute you for your political views is not going to earn you any friends.. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 09:33, 24 June 2016 (UTC)