User talk:Benplowman

Welcome!

Hello, Benplowman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Anonymous anonymous 23:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Septimuleius

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Septimuleius, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at Talk:Septimuleius. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 22:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

I have moved your {{move}} tag on Louis, 7th duc de Broglie from the main article page to the talk page. Move tags belong on the talk page. ●DanMS • Talk 20:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wording

You improved some wording of mine in the VdW article. I appreciate that, thank you.--P.wormer 12:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Hi. Thanks for your support of Bkell at RFA but I had to revert because he has not accepted the nomination yet. Stay tuned! —Wknight94 (talk) 02:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hehe, alright, although he did state on his talk page that he would accept, I understand what you're trying to do. Benplowman 02:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Joy Castro"

A page you created, Joy Castro, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jayson (talk) 08:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Wheeler FCC

The 2 halls of fame mentioned in the Tom Wheeler FCC article are 2 separate, distinct organizations, both of which have inducted him. Please refer to the cited references for clarification. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrw1234 (talk • contribs) 08:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Roskind

The article Jim Roskind has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has sources so no BLPROD. The sources are all non-independent, self-published. I tried googling the subject and he does seem a clear GNG fail. There is this but it's not reliable and potentially non-independent.WP:BASIC is not met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Roskind moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jim Roskind, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Roskind has been accepted

Jim Roskind, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toby Ragaini

The article Toby Ragaini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A BEFORE turns up no indication of sourcing to meet WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 17:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toby Ragaini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toby Ragaini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toby Ragaini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 23:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add a Fact survey and thank you

Thank you for testing out the Add A Fact browser extension! This extension was developed as an experiment by the Future Audiences team at the Wikimedia Foundation to learn about new ways of contributing to Wikipedia from outside of our website/apps.

We are planning to wrap up this experiment this December, sunsetting the extension and publishing our findings on-wiki. We’d like to invite you to take part in an exit survey to tell us more about your experience of trying out the extension, and to share any ideas you have about how to support new ways of contributing to Wikipedia. The survey is anonymous (see the survey privacy statement) and should take about 10–15 minutes to complete.

You can take the Goole Forms survey here.

Kind regards, MPinchuk (WMF)

17:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)