User talk:Kennedygregb

Beerch, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Beerch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

well...

if something must be written about you, may as well get it right ;)

- all the best, signed "you know who" (no, not voldemort) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.42.246.46 (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Beerch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

You will also find useful advice at WP:Autobiography and at WP:Notability (sports). --David Biddulph (talk) 07:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Libby Birch has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Libby Birch. Thanks! NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your help and assistance , i have made all your suggestions and if you have any further input that would be greatly appreciated if possible can you advise is this draft just waiting in a que now for formal ratification ? many thanks

Beerch (talk) 01:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kennedygregb. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 03:17, 13 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

thanks for your on going assistance with my learning and this article Beerch (talk) 11:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Beerch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:Libby Birch, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC) THANKYOU So Very Very much For your help ,CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE FROM MANY SUGGESTIONS MADE FROM EDITS IN TALK SECTION OF THE TEA HOUSE AND I AM SEEKING FURTHER ASSISTANCE AND HAVE FOLLOWED THIS RECOMMENDATION . MY NAME IS GREG AND I AM JUST SIMPLY A FOLLOWER OF THE WESTERN BULLDOGS AFL WOMENS TEAM AND WOULD LIKE TO ENTER ARTICLES ON ALL THE PLAYERS . I HAVE STARTED WITH THIS ARTICLE LIBBY BIRCH .I HAVE MADE MANY MANY DRAFT EDITS AND IMPROVEMENTS OF THIS BUT AM UNSURE IF I SHOULD HAVE MADE THE ARTICLE IN THIS AREA/ SPACE ORIGINALLY SO I AM PLACING IT IN THIS SECTION NOW FOR EVERYONE TO SEE AND READ AND EDIT FREELY . I HAVE NO VESTED INTEREST IN THESE PLAYERS OTHER THAN TO SEE THEM ON WIKIPEDIA AS I FIND IT TO BE A VERY WORTHWHILE AND FACTUAL SOURCE OF INFORMATION FOR THE WORLD AND THESE NOTABLE WOMEN SHOULD HAVE ARTICLES . THANKYOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK AND GREAT ASSISTANCE , IF THERE ARE OTHER MATTERS THAT NEED TO BE ATTENDED TO THEN PLEASE FEEL FREE TO MAKE THE NECCESSARY EXPERT ADVICE , MANY THANKS for everyones help as i am new to this Greg Ps sorry for using capitals in this reply and thanks again[reply]

Birth date on Draft:Libby Birch

You thanked me for this edit but later, in this edit you replaced the exact date of birth. Please do not include the exact date of birth unless it has already been widely published outside of Wikipedia, or else it has been published by the subject herself, such as on her personal web site. When an experienced editor has removed content, giving a reason, please don't restore it without giving a reason for that action. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou for your assistance and help , i actually didnt add it back in deliberatly as i am learning , i thought your edit was actually to do with the refernce i had used on the birthdate so i do apologise and have taken it back out as you suggested , now that i fully understand that matter ..thanks again Greg

Comments on Draft:Libby Birch

in this edit you removed a reviewer's comment, replacing it with one of your own. There are several problems with this:

Your comment was in ALL CAPS. This is hard to read, is taken as the equilivant of shouting at people, and is seen as rude. Please don't do it in future.
Your comment says CHANGES HAVE NOW ALL BEEN MADE. This is not correct: 1) you are still over-using jargon. 2) several cited sources do not say anything about the subject, such as <https://www.bna.org.au/>. Perhaps there is a useful source soemewher on that domain, but you must cite the exact page where the information is to be found. 3) you should provide the titles of pages cited, and if possible such further information as the date a page was published, the name of the website or publisher, the name of the author when an author is listed, and always the date you retrieved the source (for online sources). You are doing better on that.
Even when all comments have been addressed, please leave the reviewer's comments in place. This allows a future reviewer to understand what issues have been dealt with.

You are getting closer, i think, to a valid article. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:14, 13 June 2017 (UTC) Thankyou very very much for your feedback and edits , i will continue to make the changes you so kindly recommend . I apologise and your assistance helps me learn how to forfill the requirements . thankyou again , i am reading as much as i can but this helps so much . Greg[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Libby Birch has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Libby Birch. Thanks! Sb2001 ^{talk page} 20:01, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Libby Birch has been accepted

Libby Birch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kennedygregb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kennedygregb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Libby Birch, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 00:22, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Libby Birch. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David Biddulph (talk) 00:44, 27 April 2019 (UTC) Thankyou for your asssitance with this and i am just learning and doing my best . I mean no harm or issue . I appreciate you teaching me the protocols . I have no conflict of interest in this athlete other than i admire what she is doing in aflw and for kids growth and developemnt at a club level i have begun writing for pages for other such athletes but havent finished them . sorry for any inconvenience .I thought what i updated was correctly done so i am dispointed i have upset you . thanks again ps. i am old and retired and make plenty of errors so thats why there are so many edits(kennedygregb (talk) 06:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest #2

Higher up this page you denied any connection to Libby Birch. I'm afraid that I don't find that denial credible – you have 383 edits to this project, and every single one of them relates to this person. If have some personal connection you are expected to disclose it (though you're not required to say exactly what the connection is); if your connection involves any financial reward or emolument, you are obliged to make disclosure.

Specifically, our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation". An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. If you are receiving, or expect to receive, monetary or other benefits or considerations from editing Wikipedia as a representative of an organization (as an employee or contractor; as an employee or contractor of a firm hired by that organization for public-relations purposes; as owner, officer or other stakeholder; or by having some other form of close financial relationship with a topic you wish to write about), then you must disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kennedygregb. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kennedygregb|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are not being directly or indirectly compensated in any way for your edits, please say so, here on this page. Otherwise, please make the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you have answered this message. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I wasn't clear before – I thought that "please do not edit further until you have answered this message" was easily understood, but you seem not to have got my meaning. I'll try again: my question here about your conflict of interest requires an answer; you should give that answer before you make any other edit anywhere in Wikipedia. You are expected to communicate with other editors when necessary – please read WP:COMMUNICATE. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your asssitance with this and i am just learning and doing my best . I mean no harm or issue . I appreciate you teaching me the protocols . I have no conflict of interest in this athlete other than i admire what she is doing in aflw and for kids growth and developemnt at a club level i have begun writing for pages for other such athletes but havent finished them . sorry for any inconvenience .I thought what i updated was correctly done so i am dispointed i have upset you . thanks again ps. i am old and retired and make plenty of errors so thats why there are so many edits thankyou for any help you can give me(kennedygregb (talk) 06:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]