User talk:Bearcat/Archive 83
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bearcat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | → | Archive 90 |
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia SIA-Class level-5 vital articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia SIA-Class vital articles in Society indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Redirect-Class India articles of Unknown-importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Agh!
Bearcat, what have you done!? Sarah777 (talk) 00:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- About what? Bearcat (talk) 00:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Draft-Class Maharashtra articles of Low-importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abraham Hodgson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Category.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
LGBT categories
Hi again! I see you add LGBT-related categories to biographies of living people, which is great, except sometimes the entry's prose does not actually confirm the subject's sexual preference or gender identity. Sure, we can assume most drag queens are LGBT, but this is not always the case. Part of me thinks this is no big deal, but part of me thinks we should not be adding LGBT-related categories unless sources and an article's prose warrant category inclusion. Curious if you have any thoughts. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Draft-Class Punjab (India) articles of Low-importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Draft-Class Websites articles of Mid-importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge seventh anniversary
|
The Bronze Maple Leaf Award | |
| This maple leaf is awarded to Bearcat for ensuring there are proper references on Canadian biographies during the seventh year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 14:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC) |
Org website as acceptable primary source
Hi Bearcat. Thanks for your work editing the Hannah Green (poet) article. I notice that in this edit you removed the citation for Green's editorship at CV2, which was the journal's own masthead page for being an unsuitable self-published primary source. According to the Wikipedia:PRIMARYSOURCE, that appears to be an acceptable use, which is elaborated on in Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources explanatory essay: "The organization's own website is an acceptable (although possibly incomplete) primary source for information about what the company says about itself and for most basic facts about its history, products, employees, finances, and facilities." and "The person's autobiography, own website, or a page about the person on an employer's or publisher's website, is an acceptable (although possibly incomplete) primary source for information about what the person says about themself. Such primary sources can normally be used for non-controversial facts about the person and for clearly attributed controversial statements."
If this was in any way a controversial statement this would not be a reliable source, but the self-published nature doesn't seem to me to be a problem in the case of this simple claim. If your complaint is that it's an inappropriate use of a self-published source for a claim about a third party, as per Wikipedia:BLPSPS, I think that the org's proximity to the subject (employing them) makes it no longer fully a third party source. Sorry for that wall of text, I'm just trying to understand what I did wrong. Thanks! Handpigdad (talk) 20:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
years in FRY categorization
Hi, I noticed you created category redirects like this yesterday, but that's supposed to be going the other way around per Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_8#Federal_Republic_of_Yugoslavia? Is this some sort of a technicality to help the bot do the work of renaming, or? --Joy (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation, when I looked around a bit further, I observed the possible race condition and suspected this might have been the case :) --Joy (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
You know that templates can populate categories, right? When you remove the templates you can break other things. The file above was nearly deleted because you removed the license tag and VRT information just to get rid of the category. Instead of yelling in all-caps in an edit summary blindly reverting my replacement of the tag and VRT information, maybe you should have just gone to the template and removed the redlinked category that you found to be problematic. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Draft-Class Mumbai articles of Low-importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Unassessed vital articles in Science
A tag has been placed on Category:Unassessed vital articles in Science indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Unassessed vital articles in Arts
A tag has been placed on Category:Unassessed vital articles in Arts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)