User talk:BaturalNoobs

Sept 2016

Your recent editing history at Jim Cummings shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarnetteD|Talk 19:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noobs, stop edit warring. You don't seem to understand what is required of you. I also removed a botched attempt at "dispute resolution"--we can't resolve the dispute until you understand what the dispute is. MarnetteD, I'd appreciate it if you didn't rely on acronyms on that talk page; if you wrote whole sentences with the terms explained better, they might be more likely to get it. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]