User talk:BadMombo1660

Welcome!

Hi BadMombo1660! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Classicwiki (talk) If you reply to me here, please ping me. 06:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, BadMombo1660, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —usernamekiran (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Spiritwood Incident

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Spiritwood Incident, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gun details

I'm not sure that some of the details that have been added are all that important. ♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why not?

Ballistics/forensics/autopsy details are a big part of things, I think it is disappointing how such details are usually not reported on by journalists.

If a mass shooting article on wikipedia simpily says "[insert number] people were killed" in the "shooting" section of the article, and no further details are given, I find that to be a huge disappointment. (2021 San Jose and Indianapolis shooting articles are very dull because no details are given.)

A ballistic report is how investigators learn about the order of events. BadMombo1660 (talk) 12:46, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User page is a bit hard to view/read

Hello!

I've recently tried to view your user page, and it's kinda impossible to view the whole thing at regular zoom even with a fairly large monitor. You're of course welcome to keep it how it is, as it is your userpage, but I would kindly suggest that you organize it so that the images don't all sit on top of one another at full resolution. Maybe having them all left-aligned and on their own lines would accomplish this?

In any case, up to you.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am not sure how to fix it, sorry good sir. I am a moble user unfortunately, so doing complicated edits is difficult for me. BadMombo1660 (talk) 02:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate edit summary on the 2024 Chicago train shooting article

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary or a comment in an edit to 2024 Chicago train shooting that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikipedia:SUMMARYNO Raskuly (talk) 02:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 06:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]