User talk:Avjoska

Wow!!!

Welcome!!

I noticed you contributed to one of my articles (Gustav Suits) and I looked at your other contributions - then noticed your userpage says you can speak Estonian!!! How interesting and how valuable to Wikipedia. I can speak a limited amount of Estonia (I have Estonian heritage and a deep interest in the country). I wonder if you could help me to learn Estonian, and I'm sure you'd be able to translate articles from an Estonian Wikipedia or encyclopedia into our English Wikipedia. Anyway, it's great to have another Estonian around, especially one who is fluent in the language!! If you need anything, please leave a message on my talk page. =) Srose (talk) 19:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• I'd be honored to receive your instruction and, of course, if you feel up to it, Wikipedia could use some more articles about Estonians and Estonia in general!!! It's so tough to find someone capable of speaking Estonian in the US; my grandfather can speak Estonian but not very well, as he was very young when he left the country. Feel free to email me by clicking on the "email me" link on my user page. =) Srose (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Ene article created

Hi, Ave! I just thought I'd let you know that I copyedited and posted the Ene article. I gave you credit on both of our created article pages, and I have to say that I am honored by your link to me on your userpage! :) My email server is temporarily down and I will probably take a nap soon (I got up very early; although it's now 10:50 in the morning in my time zone I got up much earlier than I'm accustomed to during the summer). I'll email you when I wake up from my nap.

Additionally, I have to say I'm incredibly impressed with all of your edits. Estonia will soon have equal representation, thanks to your hard work! :) Srose (talk) 14:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Your services are requested

...in the brand new Wikiproject for Estonia!! Please sign up by inserting four tildes {~~~~) in the next open bullet in the Participants section. :) Srose (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

---

Wikiproject Estonia Newsletter

You are receiving this notice because of your involvement in Wikipedia:Wikiproject Estonia.

Effort of the Week Update: I just wanted to let everybody know that the Constitution of Estonia, the group effort of the week, is finally finished! :) Of course, additional information would be lovely, if anyone would like to help out. :)

Need Help? If anyone else has an article they've been working on and may want help with, please list it on our project page under "Effort of the Week".

Have a great week, and if you need anything, feel free as always to contact me. :)

Srose (talk) 13:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Award for best contributors of WP-Estonia

Could you please take a look at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Estonia#WP-EE_awards_for_best_contributors... an let me know what you think.--Alexia Death 09:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Estonian translation

Hello! Thanks for answering me. This translation I know, I have a metal version of this one. It's the translation of the original soviet anthem. But my version is different, because is anti-soviet-russia, anti-communist, as well. Can you translate me, please? If you have free time now, and if you want sure.... Thank you! vonusovef ^(wha?) 06:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Avjoska, thank you very much for your brilliant translation! God bless you! Sincerly, vonusovef ^(wha?) 06:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'll try to do it. --vonusovef ^(wha?) 07:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

What is this?

[1]? Alex Bakharev (talk) 04:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't notice someone already deleted the spam, so my change put the spam back. i'm very sorry. Avjoska (talk) 04:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I thought something like this. Thanks for your help Alex Bakharev (talk) 04:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Slip of the mouse?

Hi, was this reversion a mistake? - Fayenatic (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

yes. sorry. again. Avjoska (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

"Again"? Oh, I see -- like the one above! No problem. Live and learn. Thanks for joining in with the hard work anyway! - Fayenatic (talk) 21:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

{{User time EET}}

I fixed this for you     — SkyLined {^talk_contribs 23:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johann Urb

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Johann Urb, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Estonian volunteer of the year

Avjoska, if you could provide a short description the volunteer of the year selection you mentioned, I'd like to mention it in the Signpost.--ragesoss (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

What would be the deadline for that short description? Avjoska (talk) 06:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SuperNoova

A tag has been placed on SuperNoova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Guy0307 (talk) 07:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Ram Narayan

Thanks for starting the article! Hekerui (talk) 20:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Question

Hello, I stumbled across this news article Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-05-18/Multilingual_contests. I was wondering if there was an actual prize handed out? Was the prize something material or just recognition? Thanks, Mahanga^Talk 19:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

The main prize for Estonian language winner was a trip to Norway (Oslo) and for Norwegian languages was a trip to Estonia (Tallinn). Avjoska (talk) 21:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Cobden

A tag has been placed on Joe Cobden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Swarm^Talk 20:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

• Your article was deleted because it said no more than "Joe Cobden (born October 7, 1978 in Halifax, Nova Scotia) is an American actor." Wikipedia gets new articles at a rate of more than one a minute, many of which are one-liners like that; it would be good if the volunteer New Page Patrollers had time to check each one out, see if they are real and notable, look for sources, and expand them, but they don't, so unless an article gives some clear indication that its subject meets Wikipedia's requirement of notability it is likely to be speedily deleted. There is nothing to stop you putting the article in again, but read Your First Article first to understand what you need to do to make an acceptable article, particularly the need for references. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Avjoska! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Raivo Järvi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for adding the pictures of the poets. It's much appreciated. Photos of poets are always appreciated. Span (talk) 12:39, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Nice to hear/read that:) Well, I do for Wikipedia what I can and hope others do what I can't :) Avjoska (talk) 13:27, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Well, thank you for all the work you do. Best wishes Span (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Wright Challenge

Welcome to the Wright Challenge - do add your geo-location to the talk page. Welcome Estonia Victuallers (talk)

Thanks for the welcome. I'm in Estonia. Avjoska (talk) 08:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Wright Challenge map

Do add yourself here We now have 45 editors. I am hoping to present this work at Wikimania so your place on the map is particularly valued Victuallers (talk) 19:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC) AAH! Thats where you are! thanks Victuallers (talk) 10:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Finally :) You're welcome :) Avjoska (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

From Derby

On 3rd September you can watch the LIVE WEBCAST here: meanwhile --

Thank you from the Wikimedia Foundation and Thank you from Derby Museums for your friendly participation in the Wright Challenge This was the first multilingual Wikipedia collaboration. 51 Wikipedians took part, in at least 61 languages Your contribution shows how we might work with any cultural institution, in any country ... that's the future of Wikipedia!

Andrew Dalby 12:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Avjoska

We are having another party - Want to come? This is multi-lingual! et: is very welcome Victuallers (talk) 10:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

'Gibraltarpedia in an international and muli-cultural collaboration' Please translate the text below into the language of your wiki We would like to invite you to contribute to the GibraltarpediA project, the world's first WIkipedia City. The project needs writers, photographers, translators and others to help build the first wiki city which bridges Europe and Africa. We are going to transform Gibraltar and the surrounding areas in Morocco and Spain into areas rich with encyclopedic content immediately accessible using QR codes and NFC on plaques for visitors and local people. There are prizes to reward contributors in the Gibraltarpedia Multilingual challenge for the best editors, photographs and cartographers... whoever you are. More at Gibraltarpedia.org

'Gibraltarpedia in an international and multi-cultural collaboration'

Immunofluorescent Computed Tomography

I noticed you have edited this page; do you have any clue as to what's going on with the page duplication? The two pages seem to have identical titles, so I have no idea as to how a new one was created. dci | TALK 19:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Igor Kotjuh

The article Igor Kotjuh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Baltic)

Hi. I see you are listed as a member of a WikiProject of a Baltic state. I was wondering if anybody who actively works on Estonian, Lithuanian or Latvian articles, would be interested in launching your own Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Baltic), based on the Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) and Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea would be to try to bring about 1000 article improvements and creations on this region as an enjoyable challenge and potentially things like National Contests with prizes. If you'd be interested and think it's something you might regularly contribute to, comment and sign up at Talk:Baltic states. If there is interest we can move this to a project somewhere and set something up, thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Avjoska. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of SuperNoova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SuperNoova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperNoova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sadads (talk) 09:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Stop it

Fuck off, Slav.--2601:3C5:8200:B79:1583:C76D:9623:FB37 (talk) 03:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Avjoska. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Avjoska. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Avjoska. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Demonstration in support of Ukraine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Demonstration in support of Ukraine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Demonstration in support of Ukraine has been accepted

Demonstration in support of Ukraine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Villem Lüüs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Villem Lüüs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Seagull123 Φ 17:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Just for future, maybe the "what links here" would be enough? no? Avjoska (talk) 17:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean by the "what links here"? Seagull123 Φ 17:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Really? You're serious? WP is meant as a little puzzle-globe. everything should be connected. You are seriously first moving to draft and THEN asking what is "what links here"? Avjoska (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

I know what it means, I just don't understand your question. I moved it to draftspace for the reasons above - it is an unreferenced biography (when I moved it). If he hadn't died about two weeks ago, it would've been eligible for deletion under WP:BLPPROD. If you are asking whether the pages that link to Villem Lüüs is good enough for references - here - then no. References must be in the actual article. If I have misunderstood your question, please let me know. Seagull123 Φ 17:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

I just find sources in estonian language don't help people reading in english. there are sources in estonian and russian WP. Avjoska (talk) 17:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Per WP:NONENG, non-English sources are allowed. Seagull123 Φ 17:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Villem Lüüs (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Villem Lüüs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Villem Lüüs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Avjoska! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Villem Lüüs (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Villem Lüüs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Villem Lüüs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 07:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vahur Afanasjev, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Deaths in 2021

Hello, when you add people to the Deaths in 2021 page, please note that they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 11:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

And they should have an English Wikipedia article if they were deceased more than one month ago (your addition in Deaths in November 2020 does not - it was a redlink and has been removed in line with consensus). I cannot stress too much how detrimental it is to your editing reputation to carry out blanket deletions of valid and researched data, as you did during your edits to Deaths in November 2020 (another editor thankfully restored the missing information). Ref ^(chew)(do) 12:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

I know how detrimental it is to my editing reputation to carry out blanket deletions of valid and researched data. I think it was some kind of mistake in system. I was surprised to find out i have done it. I was even more surprised to find out I can't restore it myself. Avjoska (talk) 11:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Villem Lüüs (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Doric Loon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Villem Lüüs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Villem Lüüs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Doric Loon (talk) 12:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Merle Veesalu-Rand

The article Merle Veesalu-Rand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

clearly doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)