User talk:Autoadrenaline

Welcome!

Hello, Autoadrenaline, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Grand Theft Auto V. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 10:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SOETERMANS. I find this very helpful. Autoadrenaline (talk) 12:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:XT RedZone per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/XT RedZone. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 05:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Autoadrenaline (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since I have been unable to focus on Wikipedia for several months due to some personal reasons, I understand that I have been mistakenly accused of a sockpuppet claim and blocked from editing. The reasons suggest that the sockpuppet, XT RedZone and I are the same person, because we have had somewhat similar interests and contributions. But the provided evidences by Carfan568 does not directly prove that claim, but create speculation. In my POV, their evidence proved more about Gaayhan being the same person as XT RedZone, instead of myself. Also, note the fact that what I have been accused of doing similar to XT RedZone is that updating information such as the revenue of GTA V and etc. Which were important to maintain their respective article's quality.

It is possible that two or more people can have the same interests, since the articles, Nissan GT-R, Grand Theft Auto V and Lewis Hamilton are among the most popular individuals/elements of of their own categories and industries. The evidence provider themselves having similar interests, looking at their [[1]] further proves it. What I do not understand is that how can I be considered as the same person as someone who had been accused of poor [usage of English] and that have committed multiple edit wars.

In contrasts, although there have been some disagreements and discussions with some editors, which is usual; my contributions have always been in good faith and my contributions like [[2]] had always been useful and important. I assume these reasons and evidences are enough to reach consensus and I hope this matter will be treated fairly. I will be open for any questions or requests to further help in this investigation, thank you.Autoadrenaline (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC) Autoadrenaline (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's true that different editors can have the same interests, but it's odd for two different people to be interested in the exact same articles. 331dot (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot, your claim "interested in the exact same articles" is wrong, and again I have to mention it is speculation. Looking at XT RedZone's contributions, it is evident that they have contributed to a wide range of articles that has nothing do with me, which includes articles in the likes of McLaren 720S, List of highest-grossing films, Spider-Man: No Way Home and more. While I have only made contributions to around 4 or 5 articles as same as them. I also had plans to contribute to many more different articles before getting this ban.

I would also request you to look at my very first contributions to the GT-R and Mercedes-AMG One articles, which were fixing/cleaning up their mess made in those pages. Which is a crucial reason to contribute to articles as same as them. Thank you for your time.Autoadrenaline (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Autoadrenaline (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request for another unblock request, because the previous one was not given enough importance from the respected administrators, and was not investigated comprehensively. Please find the reasons and evidences in the previous unblock request, thank you. Autoadrenaline (talk) 03:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your explanation was examined and found to be insufficient to consider unblocking. I note also that you are primarily using proxies in an apparent attempt to hide where you are contributing to. What evidence I am able to tease out of the technical logs does generally match that of previously blocked sockpuppet accounts. Good block. Yamla (talk) 10:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla, I am aware of WP:PROXY and it is not to hide from where I am contributing to. As I am no longer a Wiki-contributor because of this block, I am allowed to use open proxies, because of privacy concerns. I am able to switch back to my original proxy, once I am allowed to contribute.

I would like to know why my evidences are insufficient, because I can provide more in my favor. Additionally, I still believe that our technical blogs "generally" does not match. Because my contributions like [3] were been fixing up their mistakes and errors.

After browsing for couple of hours and personally talking to some Wiki administrators, I now understand that it is more unlikely to getting my account unblocked, because both of us know the reasons and I do not want to talk about it any further. Also, I know that I am not guilty of any of these accusations and I know that I was a major contributor for multiple articles. Their previous and current states speaks in favour (they still look the same and outdated since I left). Autoadrenaline (talk) 07:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}}