User talk:AugustTip

This is AugustTip's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:AugustTip/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:AugustTip/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AugustTip! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregg Kevin Jann (March 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not make a credible claim of significance. This draft would be subject to speedy deletion in article space. If this draft is resubmitted in its current form or a similar form, it should be nominated for deletion.

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references. Do not resubmit this draft without references.

This draft, which is not written in sentence form or in paragraphs, is incomprehensible. If it is meant to be about a person, it does not establish biographical notability.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregg Kevin Jann (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like it was copied from a biography website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gregg Kevin Jann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gregg Kevin Jann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Gregg Kevin Jann

Draft:Gregg Kevin Jann, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Gregg Kevin Jann and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Gregg Kevin Jann during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA were:

The text of this submission has been removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning biographies of living persons; we cannot accept such articles if they are unsourced, or contain unverifiable information which is potentially defamatory. All articles about living persons must conform to our biographies of living persons policy. In order to permit the author of this submission to provide sources that may satisfy the policy, the text of the page is available in the history.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:AugustTip/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:AugustTip/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 22:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. See User talk:HonorableTip for further explanation. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then by add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of this page, replacing the words "Your reason here" with a brief explanation of the reason you think you should be unblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=notable, felt banned, since named both Pandemic monikers originally, story in my next book and Sonoma county Yellow Pages.com and Alignable.com, and Yelp.com for reliable health license information like a press release of a magazine businessman; we all strive for honest and integrity here on Wikipedia, you could read something about subject on Everybodywiki.org for Gregg Kevin Jann; AugustTip no longer write articles of creation, did write syntax of World Geo for Wkipedia 1st

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AugustTip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

notable person, AugustTip understands wikipedia.com editors about references and subject people undocumented in media. AugustTip understands the policies of a big international encyclopedia, that is the writers are accountable to the public and writes detailed facts and is not warm or personal like a psychologist of the biographer heart. I'm sorry I barreled through, for a guy who couldn't have been reported. He is in everybodywiki.org and he made the most history in the USA. AugustTip did get copyright permission, and sources from Jannda.com are a once in a lifetime opportunity that Wikipedia.com ignored a human. For Gregg Kevin Jann named both Pandemic Crisis monikers, as well as 4 diseases in total straddling the times of AugustTip article writing for Wikipedia.com. He did more than that, and no one found him notable in media except his content is highest integrity. I don't consider caring about someone finally after decades, to get him off a ban for supposed Presidential speech writing that you added to the conditions of black listing of an artist who designs through the craft of writing and Christian love. AugustTip is a good editor, and has inside political information about Sonoma County, USA. You are not to ban him or AugustTip in a block, that I felt compelled to write a story about a Man who needed to be covered in a favored encyclopedia. I felt he had too much stolen from him, from California state bureaucrats in your coverage of Wikipedia.com and in an Academy Award, even more awards and maybe trillions of dollars. You blocked him and me - just in writing a creation article, so AugustTip takes it well. Do foreign countries like USA freedom of expression, for example? I am not going to write them. AugustTip can edit syntax as I can help tutor people as a coach,as a college graduate, and help set the record straight in poly sci and business. I have an attitude about blacklisted people. I don't feel you did it to me. Press Releases are a fallacy that I learned while I was elected to a school board. Character Ed works, if attached to Intellectual Property when it means something of money to creator- and we are ironic aren't we. AugustTip (talk) 02:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can't really find much of an argument for unblocking when I go fishing in this stream of consciousness, but what did get on my hook (extended metaphor ... gotta love it!) was an admission of at least meatpuppetry: "You blocked him and me" And maybe sock puppetry as well. I also found it incredibly arrogant of you to presume to tell us who we are, and are not, to block. We don't tell you who you can and can't let in your house, guy. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AugustTip