User talk:Astroeclipse

Welcome!

Hello, Astroeclipse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Solar eclipse of July 2, 2019, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mm40 (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Solar eclipse of July 2, 2019

A tag has been placed on Solar eclipse of July 2, 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mm40 (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Solar eclipse of May 10, 2013

A tag has been placed on Solar eclipse of May 10, 2013 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mm40 (talk) 11:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've declined the speedy deletion tags on two of your solar eclipse articles due to the content that is in the previous eclipse articles, and that you are currently working on them. However not being an expert on the subject I would question the notability of an article for each individual eclipses, and noting your few edits I would think about getting in touch with the guys at Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomy and finding out what the norms are for these articles, before going much further. Also that you are linking xjubier external sites raises questions. Any questions don't hesitate to give me a shout. ^Khukri 12:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your solar eclipse articles

Hello! I was looking over your articles and when I looked at the talk pages it had this posted:

It's/is coming

I removed it and was curious as to why you put those there? No problems (you seem new to the Wiki) but most talk pages host discussions, not so much anything someone wants to put on them.

Thank you,

Marx01 ^{Tell me about it} 00:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]