User talk:Asokagr8

October 2012

Your recent editing history at Richmond College (Sri Lanka) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Richmond College (Sri Lanka). DVdm (talk) 18:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation. Information that you add to Wikipedia articles must be reliably sourced. In addition, when you make a claim that someone is "prominent", you have to provide a source that supports such a label, or at a minimum there must be an article at Wikipedia on the person.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]