User talk:Askave

WP:PEA

Hello, I'm Toccata quarta. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Askave (talk • contribs) 17:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit. Toccata quarta (talk) 19:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was only giving back what was already written there and what is proved in specialized reviews.

"Minor" edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Yopie. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 11:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot respect or even cooperate with somebody, who repeatedly removes apparent facts, proved by references, in addition without any relevant reason (or simply without any reason). It is absolutely arrogant and stupid attitude and I know from experiences of other users it is your common style. I am a researcher and your inquisitorial censorship is absolutely impossible in contemporary scientific world. It seems to be obvious you serve to something, but definitely not to the facts, if you don´t want them to be revealed. Therefore, all of your words about "objectivity" and "neutral point of view" as well as your words about cooperation can be considered only as a hypocritical bullshit.Askave (talk) 16:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To "Toccata No.4" - Please, do not teach me manners. Take care more about behaviour of that guy, deleting and erasing articles or paragraphs without any reason, regardless they are full of verifiable facts, but with an apparent special focusing on the issue, which is probably not convenient to him. Maybe I used one indecent word, but I do not behave indecent or arrogant in the own activity, which is usual attribute of that "Yopie" (and his others alter egos probably). If Wikipedia promotes itself as "neutral", that kind of behaviour is in direct contradiction to its basic principles and attacks predominantly all the people, spending a lot of time to contribute to W by some work. If that guy has the position of admin, it does not mean he can be some almighty censor.....I hope at leastAskave (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Even if a person's claim is correct, Wikipedia policies still require that we are polite to other editors that we disagree with. Please understand and follow this, even if people reject your ideas. A few days ago, I reverted your edits (changing "Czech Republic" to "Czechia"). I explained that I did this because the beginning of article for "Czech Republic" did not mention Czechia as a possible name for the country. I have now inserted Czechia as an alternate name in the "Czech Republic" article. But it was quickly reverted by another editor. At least I am trying to solve this problem. Gently, Pete unseth (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pete, unfortunately I am not sure what you have in mind. Tell me what you exactly mean. I try to be polite, but unprecendent and hypocritical behaviour of admin Yopie, deleting content of my contributions (I mean my article, not some ad hoc inventions of, which I usually only supported by comments in discussion) without any explanatzion and discussion is shocking for me. At the same time, to be accused by the same person from acting from more than one IP adresses is too much for me. I don´t need it. If Yopie would not intrude in my texts like a censor, I would not try to defend myself and react in cohesion with the fact my work is attacked unprincipled way. Thank you for your trying to solve that problem. Best regards. Askave (talk) 14:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Askave. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 00:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yopie. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Latin names of countries without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Why you deleted Dacia? Yopie (talk) 08:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page User:Askave/sandbox, by reason of its contents, was accidentally included in a content category. It has been corrected for you. For information about this, please see the guidelines about the categorization of user pages. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Czechia - the name dispute, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Columbia, Slovak and Czech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice - specifiedAskave (talk) 14:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Name of the Czech Republic, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 17:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Czechia - the name dispute. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yopie (talk) 17:22, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Name of the Czech Republic. A m i t 웃 19:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To add the link to a related theme is a vandalism ? Incredible. It means you can block me for whatever I do ? If you noticed I made a part of the article, is it also vandalism ? You can enlighten me what actually vandalism is. Askave (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Askave, I have reinserted the link that a.amitkumar removed. I am NOT an expert on the subject, but the material does not seem to me to be outside of Wikipedia guidelines. I may be corrected by somebody who knows more about the specific topic or knows more about Wikipedia guidelines. But in the mean time, I have put the link back into the article. Seeking peaceful spread of knowledge, Pete unseth (talk) 20:38, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User Mewulwe (as usual) deleted it again. He and Yopie "take care" about me a lot. Like parents :-)Askave (talk) 08:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Czechia - the name dispute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Czechia - the name dispute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Czechia - the name dispute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Yopie (talk) 10:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, stop annoy me by your slimy behaviour and awkward notices, threats etc. All that case with deletion of my article is simply a dirty swindle. "Wikipedia's principles" are only written down and maybe work for the others, but not for you. Askave (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Askave, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:Askave. According to WP:STALEDRAFT, "Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable (the template {{userspace draft}} can be added to the top of the page to identify these)." But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you are done, please donate it by moving User:Askave to a Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts subpage (a participant may help). If you are not done, please finish it and move it. If you abandoned it, you may request it for deletion by putting "{{db-u1}}" or donating it. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 21:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not abandoned, it is there, because it was not accepted as an article, but people can read it. I am not intersted in its deletion :-)Askave (talk) 15:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

dates
years
commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies for infoboxes.)

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 09:24, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I use geographical , neutral, official short and timeless name of the country. It is problem of Wikipedia, it does not use it and complicates situation in detection of the state by confusing unofficial or transitional names. Somebody should start to do it, then, all will be better for reader and well-known. Askave (talk) 09:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I noticed that you recently removed all content from MTV Czechia, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was sufficiently explained, the channel was called MTV Czechia.

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jiří Karásek ze Lvovic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hermetic and Naturalistic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste page move at MTV Czech

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give MTV Czech a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. C 679 05:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If there is something wrong, it is necessary to correct it. You have all references why. So, your reasons for reverting of the page to that nonsense "MTV Czech" are irrelevant. Askave (talk) 07:53, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Far from being "nonsense", the references at the page use "MTV Czech". The use of "MTV Czechia" is not established. C 679 09:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your references do not work. My references are apparent. You can see pages I added and you pretend you are blind (The use of "MTV Czechia" is not established) - you are funny. OK, no comment. Admin is always right, is not it ? I do not care about some stupid MTV, it was changed because of the principle and references. In addition, "Czech" is an adjective, nationality and language, but absolutely not the name of the country. Tell me, what you have against the name Czechia, it has to be some Wiki-disease. "MTV Czech and Slovakia", what is it ? The same nonsense like "MTV French and Italy". Useless to argue with you. Czechia is simply prohibited name in Wikipedia, really "objective encyclopedy...." Askave (talk) 15:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MTV uses "MTV Czech" as we can see from the references at the page. I wonder where ""MTV Czechia" comes from… you haven't provided any references which use your favoured wording, so the article can not be changed. C 679 17:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me ? Do you really wonder or are you really so blind or even so uneducated ? In addition, the article was updated and you only reverted it to outdated version. Ok, in that case, you have to to read it again :-) After this experience I do not wonder any longer after this experience. In general, it is an ill service to all Czech issues (not only) in Wikipedia.Askave (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. I recommend you read WP:A before making any more edits unattributed to reliable sources. Thanks, C 679 20:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No more play acting. Do not threaten, your sources either do not work or they are completely unreliable, and the version is outdated. Then, it is your problem, not mine. Stop annoy with your ignorant approach. Askave (talk) 21:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to MTV Czech, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. C 679 04:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the truth is not constructive and the nonsense is correct, welcome to the Wikipedian association of ignorants, found by Yopie et al. You cooperate perfectly.

May 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Czechia. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 10:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aby bylo jasno, přestaň s vandalismem! Je velice snadné dokázat, že používáš loutkové účty k trolování.--Yopie (talk) 11:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) Askave (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fact is not changed by its removing from the page. Askave (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. C 679 17:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing discussion at WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Askave. Thank you. —C 679 08:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Josef Stehlík

This is a decent article, but it needs sources. Antrocent (talk) 18:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of World War II aces from Czech Republic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of World War II aces from Czech Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of World War II aces from Czech Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 23:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of World War II aces from Czechia

To User talk:The Banner: The list of World War II aces from Czechia is not the same as List of World War II aces from Czechoslovakia , not opnly because Czechia and Czechoslovakia is not the same, but also because frist list content Czechs and second one Czech and Slovak pilots (one Slovak pilot in the second list). By deletion you also deleted some links to personal articles. Askave (talk) 04:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:The Banner that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 23:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Non-British personnel in the RAF during the Battle of Britain may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

historylearningsite.co.uk/czech_pilots_battle_britain.htm Czech Pilots and the Battle of Britain (History Learning Site, UK, 2010.]</ref>. Together with Czechoslovak pilots serving in other RAF

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Askave

User:Askave, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Askave and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Askave during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is incredible interference into my userpage. The content of my userpage is my business. You are obsessed here in deletion everything, what contents informal name of my country. Absurd. It is a censorship. Askave (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Askave (talk) 04:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:The Banner. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Banner talk 18:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was very polite response to your undemocratic (euphemism) proposal ! By what right do you want to disable the use of the name? President of our country normally uses "Czechia" in his English speeches, but some unknown Wikipedia admin can decide to prohibit it?! User talk:Askave Askave (talk) 18:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:The Banner. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. The Banner talk 18:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is definition of an attack ? Misusing the rights or telling the truth about it ? Uh, this notice is probably also personal attack, is not it ? :-)Askave (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Askave. You have new messages at Yopie's talk page.
Message added 16:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yopie (talk) 16:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Czech World War II flying aces has been nominated for merging

Category:Czech World War II flying aces has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 16:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]