User talk:Arfan/Archive1
Welcome!
Hello, Arfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! – Someguy0830 (T | C) 08:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Sasori
[edit]Really, it's very simple logic. Sasori looks the same as he did when he left the village, which was in his teens. Sasori was not a puppet at that point. His body, when converted, would not be any older than his current age, which was not above his twenties. It has been twenty years since that point. In what crazy world does any combination of 1X (pick a digit for X) + 20 come out to >= 40? Think about it. He can't possibly be in his forties. It's mathmatically impossible. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 08:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- "1X (pick a digit for X) + 20 come out to >= 40" => This is the most stupid equation I've ever known. Funny!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Causesobad (talk • contribs) 14:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
- Hey, why must you fixedly stick up for him like that? I just only said that "This is the most stupid equation I've ever known" and I haven't said anything like "this is the most stupid equation made by the most stupid guy I have ever known". Right? (haha...)^_^ This is called, uhm, "if the cap fits, wear it." Causesobad --> Talk) 17:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- As if, I don't care what you mean. Also, I don't know why you couldn't understand what I wrote. I wrote it in totaly literal words. Causesobad --> Talk) 13:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, why must you fixedly stick up for him like that? I just only said that "This is the most stupid equation I've ever known" and I haven't said anything like "this is the most stupid equation made by the most stupid guy I have ever known". Right? (haha...)^_^ This is called, uhm, "if the cap fits, wear it." Causesobad --> Talk) 17:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Please sign your posts with the method described above. Now, onto Sasori. When Chiyo first sees him, she says, "He hasn't aged a day in twenty years." Sasori's body is that of a teenager. He cannot possibly be past his thirties. There is no rational, logical, or reasonable way to justify such a fallacy, plain and simple. You're the one guessing at his age here, not me. I know for a fact my information is accurate, so what are you basing your figure on? – Someguy0830 (T | C) 09:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- She specificaly says twenty years in 266. Whatever scan you have is either mistranslated or incomplete, and you still don't have any proof for your figure. You're just making up assumptions to justify it. I have a manga scan proving my point. Until you can produce some proof saying that Sasori is over twenty or he left the village in a figure above 25, you're just making a far-reaching assumption to increase his age to the figure you mention. Thirty has far more basis than forty. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Leader Sharingan
[edit]That rumor is nonsense. The leader does not have the Sharingan, nor does he even have eyes resembling it. please stop readding it. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Temari's image
[edit]Use control-F5 to force refresh your browser or clear your cache. It's working fine. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Kakuzu thing
[edit]I have replied to that domineering Someguy... about Kakuzu. You should struggle with me. Write something to him and say that you agree with me => to make my idea bolder.Causesobad 10:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
of course. this is what he says to me: "Kakuzu is not greedy. "Greedy" is a word refered to chracteristic of somebody who does everything that can make profit to him or he'll get something for his own through that action. What kakuzu has demostrated are not that kind among the definition of "greedy"." => here's my definition. Greedy is defining goals in terms of earning money from them. He attacks Asuma sorely for that purpose. He's even been labeled as such if I'm not mistaken. Greedy is a quite apt description of his character. => How on earth after all that actions he still thinks that Kakuzu is greedy??Causesobad 10:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have edit a little and hope that it'll remain longer than others. By the way, I have tried replace that Sasori's ugly image with a much more beautiful one but one guy name Sasuke-kun27 or st like that prevent me from posting it and even threaten to block my account. what should I do to make a revenge?Causesobad 17:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Pointless? huh..
[edit]It's not pointless anyway. I will have that Someguy change following my idea. Just goggle your eyes and see!!!!
- Moreover, why U stay up so late?? Causesobad 17:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I only colour his eyes and that's all. But the important thing is: That image is super nice, and Sasori looks supe cute, supe handsome etc. Why don't we put st eye-catching rather than that small sucking image?Causesobad 17:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I must go to bed now. See again tomorrow.
- I must go to bed now. See again tomorrow.
p/s: You MUST TAKE MY SIDE. That Sasuke-kun27 (stu name, right?) so domineering, he/she overpowered me by threatening ME. I just want to make my Sasori better-look overall. Causesobad 17:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- just look out or you'll regret!OK, stop here, go to bed. Have U done "Tourism Report" yet?Causesobad 17:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not threatening you, I'm just enforcing Wikipedia's policies. It doesn't matter how a picture looks; the main goal is to find an accpetable image for the article (possibly an unaltered manga scan or anime clip). If we can, we can try to look for a nice looking pic, but just because a picture makes someone look "super cute" or "super handsome", doesn't mean that we should use it. Please read WP:FAIR and WP:FUC for more on images.
- By the way, I'm a guy. // Sasuke-kun27 18:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: Sasori
[edit]To be completely honest, I'm not really sure. I'll have to go through WP:FAIR and/or WP:FUC to make sure. // Sasuke-kun27 18:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Your Snape thing is all right?
[edit]I've read through the article on Snape. Disappointed enough, I have found nothing seems to be your editing. What did U edit?Causesobad 13:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ahh... Who do U imply, traitor? Causesobad 13:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wat about Bio tst tomorrow? Snape is Snape, but Bio tst is Bio tst. It's Ur turn to LrnbyHrt (or will U intend to ... on the table?Causesobad 14:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, Snape mission seems having failed overall. What a pity! I also think that it'll waste of time trying persuading them. Let's wait for the 7th book and we'll have the last answer.Causesobad 09:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wat about Bio tst tomorrow? Snape is Snape, but Bio tst is Bio tst. It's Ur turn to LrnbyHrt (or will U intend to ... on the table?Causesobad 14:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Snape: not fictional traitor
[edit]You misunderstand. I don't tell you it will definitely happen. My premise may be true or false, still, it's just an example. My point is that: if there's still a possibility Snape is not a traitor, then it's wrong to say he is. Also, what do you mean by the betrayal article, I had a look at it and find no connection with what Snape has done. Arhugefan 07:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- The betrayal article states and I quote: Betrayal, as a form of deception or dismissal of prior presumptions, is the breaking or violation of a presumptive social contract (trust, or confidence) that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals, between organizations or between individuals and organizations. Often betrayal is the act of supporting a rival group, or it is a complete break from previously decided upon or presumed norms by one party from the others. Now Snape was trusted, both by Dumbledore, and the Order of the Phoenix, and also by rival group Voldemort and the Death Eaters. According to Rowling's story line, Snape clearly used deception, and dismissed prior presumptions, and broke or violated a presumptive social contract, violating the trust or confidence for either rival group 1) Dumbledore and the Order of the Phoenix, or rival group 2) Voldemort and the Death Eaters. Snape produced moral and psycological conflict in his relationships with individuals (eg: Harry, Dumbledore, etc; or Voldemort, Bellatrix Lestrange, Mrs. Malfoy, etc.), and organizations (Hogwarts, Teachers, Students, Dumbledores Army, Order of the Phoenix etc.; or the Death Eaters). He supported a rival group, and possibly made a complete break from previous decided upon or presumed norms by one party from the others, by abandoning either Voldemort and the Death Eaters in the first place to join up with Dumbledore and the Order of the Phoenix, or by apparently abandoning Dumbledore and the Order of the Phoenix to rejoin Voldemort and the Death Eaters. Either way, your firm claim that Snape could not be guilty of betrayal and could not be a traitor because he betrayed nobody - because he was "only a spy doing his duties" is simply a false and invalid argument. You will have to do better than that, since Snape did virtually everything that the Betrayal definition specified. Frankly I could not care less whether Snape is listed as a "fictional traitor". I totally ignore those categories unless I am looking for other examples of the article being categorized. I am simply stating that your argument that Snape was "only a spy" and therefore "could not have betrayed anyone" is a false and misleading argument. --T-dot 13:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Hi most of those mistakes are type-os same with the lyrics I left some parts out because I was trying to remember them from heart (kinda hard to do). Thanks for finding the mistakes. And how did you stumble onto my user page? Happy Hanukkah!Sam ov the blue sand 16:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Happy Hanukkah
[edit]Happy Hanukkah Arhugefan I know you're not Jewish but I am so I feal like spreading the Hanukkah feeling. Thanks for fixing my type-os.Sam ov the blue sand 16:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Just forget it
[edit]Thank you for sending me the Christmas greeting. What a pity I wasn't online at Christmas Eve so I don't read your message. I also wish you a happy X'mas (for both this year and next year). smile Moreover, just forget all those suck things of these day and look forward. All the missions are nearly been done and we're going to be free. Hooray!!!!!AbelinCAusesobad 12:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Can U check the website softvnn.com whether it's accessible or not for me, plz? I couldn't access it for 2 days. >_<
Create new page
[edit]Furthermore, I want to construct a new page of "Structure and properties" of HNO3. Join with me? AbelinCAusesobad 13:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Earthquake effect
[edit]I can't access to some websites anymore (softvnn, 4 eg). What a big problem! I ask my uncle what the matter is with my ADSL, he said that it's due to the effect of earthquake that makes the connection will be interrupted until it's fixed and blah blah blah something I don't understand. What 'bout U? Is everything all right? p/s: I allow people to vandalise my user page, EXCEPT YOU!!! => Don't try or I'll report to the admin & U'll say goodbye to your account. (hehe)AbelinCAusesobad 04:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Surprise!!!!!
[edit]Yeepeee! How funny it is U find out such a thing! I try checking on Google and answers.com and it reveals out that it's the truth (:-0). I can't believe that almost all of the interesting novellas thought to be by Stine I've read up til now are only written under his name. In conclusion, I nearly haven't read any books by him except for 2 tiny ones in Beware! and "Switched" and I've thought that I'm a big fan of him => Incredible truth.
Check this: http://www.mcpl.lib.mo.us/readers/series/juv/title.cfm?id=590
AbelinCAusesobad 09:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
By the way, change your signature which includes user talk and contribs as I've taught you. I'm bored with seeing your stupid user page all the times. And WHAT ABOUT THE HNO3 THING?AbelinCAusesobad 09:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Hand Seals article
[edit]It's a redirect now. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Fairuse image
[edit]Can you give me the link of the article about when can we use an available image on Wiki? I don't know what is considered a fairuse one because I see a lot of people use image with license without the tag "public domain".AbelinCAusesobad 06:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- have U done anything with the S's image? I've contacted a reputable expert but still haven't got the reply. Hope that everything will go smoothly (I finally decide to contact more than one person to increase the success rate).AbelinCAusesobad 16:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Your work on that seems monumental enough. Good attempt!!! (poor the page and the edit summary!).AbelinCAusesobad 16:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Do you understand the word "Keep" and "delete"? One side says that they agree to delete the page, others say they want to "keep" it. I agree to "keep" it but it should be shortened. It's the rules and it's totally appropriate to do that. This is not the place for naruto-fans to build up everything they want. A lot of mangas don't even have the privilege to create such trivia info like that (Hikaru No Go even doesn't have its own title characters' articles, so unfair). I used to be in the balance whether choosing "keep" or "delete". BTW, stop that kind of foolery on edit summary "welcomed a brilliant IP user who had contributed to a brilliant article". AbelinCAusesobad 17:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Go off the deep end
[edit]I have a bad day as I find this sucking page. I don't know when it's created but it lies in my Abe's category just like a stinking pus.AbelinCAusesobad
- Furthermore, that nomination not appeals to me any little. I'm in a bad mood. AbelinCAusesobad 14:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
RE:Arjen Robben
[edit]Hi. Because it was linked as deleted. kalaha 17:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well... Normally I say that F.C. Copenhagen is no. 1. Then come Arsenal and Bayern. kalaha 12:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
AL article
[edit]Please stay out of the Lincoln problem and I don't want you to give me meaningless judgement. AbelinCAusesobad 06:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know why. But there's a comment. Here's the link: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality of Abraham Lincoln (2nd nomination). AbelinCAusesobad 16:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I didn't notice it. AbelinCAusesobad 16:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know why. But there's a comment. Here's the link: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality of Abraham Lincoln (2nd nomination). AbelinCAusesobad 16:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Production when reacts with metals
[edit]Hey, let's check this for me:
When HNO3 reacts with metals (except for Au, Pt), the production will be NO2, NO, N2O, N2, NH4NO3 and H2O ==> True?
And I found a material which inludes a reaction like this:
16 HNO3 + 12e- -> 14 NO3- + 4H2O + 2NH4OH
=> What this? Conditions for this reaction? Causesobad --> Talk) 10:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have simplify both my UP and my sign. Look good? Causesobad --> Talk) 10:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Other stuffs
[edit]Sorry, I've removed my comments from your talk page, as you already read it and I think it's kinda wierd saying things like that. Causesobad --> Talk) 07:01, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, why can't I save the talk page??? Causesobad --> Talk) 07:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uhm, no. I write a message to him and I couldn't save the content. Now everything is OK. Causesobad --> Talk) 07:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, this one seems useful WP:ESL (for me!). Causesobad --> Talk) 14:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uhm, no. I write a message to him and I couldn't save the content. Now everything is OK. Causesobad --> Talk) 07:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Stuffs
[edit]I took your idea. You're right. It's time for me to join WP:CHEM after a fairly long time I edit chem-related articles. And what about that thing? Have you found any interesting materials?Causesobad --> (Talk) 18:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia."
"Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism."
Wikipedia: Policies and Guidelines require that the page User: Haselhurst be modified in accordance with reasons mentioned in User talk: Haselhurst.
Ojones (User talk: Ojones1)
RFA discussions
[edit]Arfan, I think there's been some unnecessary tension surrounding you're oppose of MER-C. Partly this stems from the eternal debate about whether RFA is a vote or more of a discussion (it has elements of both). Partly we haven't been as civil as possible in responding to your !vote (not vote). In any case, many people respond to an RFA !vote because they disagree with the reasoning and think it's important to discuss/argue the points raised, because the points will inevitably be considered by other !voters evaluating the candidate. You're oppose has undoubtedly attracted a lot of attention because of your unusual reasoning, which many of us consider weak. I think most of us don't question your oppose (noting the "per above" part), but rather the part that references the closure of RFAs, for the reasons we stated. That said, I understand your point about making the formatting error that remained for another editor to fix. I just disagree with it, so I'm inevitably trying to discuss it at the RFA's page. Sorry if my attempt to discuss it felt more like me trying to interrogate you. That wasn't my intention, and I think that others feel the same way, even if we don't always express ourselves in the most tactful of ways. Cheers, Arfan.--Kchase T 21:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks a lot! I really appreciate it! => -- Hariharan91 17:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Hariharan91 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
- Haha. Me too! I'm a big fan of Arjen Robben and Petr Cech. And I support the Netherlands national football team and Chelsea F.C. too. -- Hariharan91 07:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- I love him cuz he's such a good player. Who cares bout looks? Have you seen how Ronaldinho looks like? He's still a fantastic player. Netherlands is one of the national football teams I support. I like the Czech Republic national football team too. Hehe. I became a Chelsea fan not because of Robben but I became a Netherlands fan cuz of him. Haha Nice getting to know you too. -- Hariharan91 08:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Cheers to you too! -- Hariharan91 08:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the barnstar! It was really nice of you. -- Hariharan91 13:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Charles's law and Gay-Lussac's law ---> Confused!!
[edit]Hey, let's take a look at these 2 pages. I'm confused. In our textbook, Charles's law is stated: "The pressure of a fixed amount of gas at fixed volume is directly proportional to its temperature in kelvins." And the formula is:
-
- --> Remember??
- While Gay-Lussac's law is stated:"At constant pressure, the volume of a given mass of an ideal gas increases or decreases by the same factor as its temperature (in kelvins) increases or decreases." The formula is built from Clapeyron equation for ideal gas:
Because P is constant, then
- →
In general, Charles's law mentions constant volume and GL's law mentions constant pressure.
But see the two articles and the two laws have interchanged the content of each other. Why? Or is there any problem with our textbook? Reply me right away!!Causesobad --> (Talk) 17:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- You such an untidy. Also, I have check on the internet and got the same result as Wiki. It's why I ask you what the problem is. Causesobad --> (Talk) 02:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- It means that U've already checked the book, right? OK, I believe now, there's no probs with my head. Causesobad → (Talk) 15:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Happy Feb 12
[edit]Dear Arfan/Archive1 |
Note: You're the first one who receive my template! Causesobad → (Talk) 13:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, but it still needs fixed. Causesobad → (Talk) 06:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Happy Chinese New Year
[edit]Thanks for your greetings. The same to you!!! Causesobad → (Talk) 04:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Re: Twinkle and other stuffs
[edit]I don't know exactly what happens to your "Twinkle". Sorry!!!
BTW, thanks so... much for your removing that silly message from my talk page. It makes my laugh, though. I have added those cats 2 days ago and then I receive the so-called "warning" just today. Haha... And the little boy doesn't understand why I added those cats, should I explain to him? However, I'm very busy these days visiting relatives and improving some articles like Georg Ohm and Gottfried Leibniz. Hey, what about our project "OCO"? Causesobad → (Talk) 15:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ahh, tomorrow you must send me the document and we'll talk through. Don't forget!! Causesobad → (Talk) 16:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello there.
[edit]Hello Arhugefan, I think I've met you somewhere before but I'm not sure. Well anyways, why did you remove my comment to Causesobad?Sam ov the blue sand 22:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- I looked at your archive and now I know where I've spoken to you before. Again thank you for cleaning up my user page ^_^.Sam ov the blue sand 23:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well from my point of view he does because even though he had been told that the cat didn't belong there, he insisted on adding it multiple times.Sam ov the blue sand 12:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- They had told me the cat didn't belong there and must I follow them? It means that they "tell it like it is"? Causesobad → (Talk) 18:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well you had yet to give your reasons behind your edits while they gave theirs so I will give them your essay and they will answer you back.Sam ov the blue sand 21:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- They had told me the cat didn't belong there and must I follow them? It means that they "tell it like it is"? Causesobad → (Talk) 18:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well from my point of view he does because even though he had been told that the cat didn't belong there, he insisted on adding it multiple times.Sam ov the blue sand 12:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Overcome Obs project
[edit]Do you have serious intention of doing this one? I've waited long enough and there's still no sign from you. Causesobad → (Talk) 15:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- The same as you. Try to LBH but can't remember anything. maybe I must withdraw and beg for loosing the deadline to Monday 'cause my brain can't digest these huge info. BTW, don't make such stupid edit summary anymore since you've been noto... enough. Understand? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Causesobad (talk • contribs) 18:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC).
- I'm online now and ready to chat. Causesobad → (Talk) 02:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- I can't think of any story and can't find any story either 'cuz I lost the book (sigh...). Causesobad → (Talk) 14:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm online now and ready to chat. Causesobad → (Talk) 02:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Re:Sources
[edit]I'm not a Robben's fan so I don't know exactly whether what U praise in his article is true or not. Sorry I can't help you revert those things 'cause I'm myself not sure (until I succeed in adding something like that in Ruud Van Nistelrooy's article then I'll help you.) :) Causesobad → (Talk) 14:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- I've read Ur article again. A BUNCH OF INFLATION! What I see: precise dribbling skills, most talented, remarkably, extra dimension, prestigious, blindingly, great dribbler,.. and so on. Even Maradona isn't described with such words. Causesobad → (Talk) 14:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- wat do U mean by "g.."? I'm tired with you, Blunderout. Causesobad → (Talk) 14:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Check for me
[edit]Hey, can you send me a new message to check if the code of my talk page normal functions. Causesobad → (Talk) 15:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'll begin our plan now. Remember to check. Causesobad → (Talk) 16:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- You're online now??? Chat, right? Causesobad → (Talk) 14:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
POTD
[edit]Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, can you see Abe's portrait as Today's Featured Picture??? Oh, my heart thumbing!!!!! Causesobad → (Talk) 03:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Online now and I'll send U the document. Causesobad → (Talk) 14:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, I say: ONLINE NOW! Causesobad → (Talk) 14:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikibreak
[edit]I'm tired and need a rest, that's all. Come back to your work now. I see you seem to be very active some day. :) Causesobad → (Talk) 15:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- You've requested to change your name, right? I don't think it's a nice name, though. And, uhm, April 1 is a good day. hehe!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Causesobad (talk • contribs) 15:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC).
My RfA
[edit]Hi S. Miyano. Did you think your account change could prevent my thank-you note so easily? Well, you're wrong, and here I am to thank you for participating in my RfA. I will use my mop responsibly - let me know if I ever mess up! Xiner (talk, email) 02:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
You have new messages!
[edit]Are there any types of script I can use to prevent the "you have new message" bar? Given that I can check my talk page once in a while to see if there's anything new, the notice is both annoying and unnecessary. Please help, thank you S. Miyano 03:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, or you could change what it looks like. What do you want to do? Prodego talk 04:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)