User talk:Arabos

Ibn Taymiyyah

Please refrain from vandalizing Wikipedia as you did here.—>Farawahar (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Farawahar i removed the "Kurd" part because it has no source of it, and your the one who vandalized a sourced info.

First of all, learn to spell, we don’t say « your the one » but « you’re the one », even if English is not my mother tongue, i know that.

Second, the Arab claim was also unsourced, so if you wanted to contribute honestly, you should have removed it too, but since you confessed that you’re Ehsan-iq, the user i reverted because he vandalized the Iran-Iraq article, i understand better your behavior ...—>Farawahar (talk) 21:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Referring to other user's edits as vandalism is a personal attack.

"@(User:Farawahar) your making things up, i removed the Kurdish part in the ethnicity section because it has a "citation needed" as it was unsourced, i didn't edit anything in the background section as you claim, you need to pay attention the next time."

The source in question, which mentioned both Arab and Kurdish ethnicity was by Khwaja Khusro Tariq, who is not a historian. Therefore, the source, which you restored is unreliable. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kansas Bear well i am not the one who sourced that info, i only removed the "Kurd" part from the ethnicity section as it had a "citation needed" and by Wikipedia laws, if you don't source it, it get's removed.

plus the guy blamed me for something i clearly didn't do, isn't that a personal attack? :/

I never said you "sourced the information", I said you restored the unreliable source. IF you had read the source it clearly stated both ethnicities, but since the source is unreliable, it and the cooresponding information should be removed.

"plus the guy blamed me for something i clearly didn't do, isn't that a personal attack?"

And your response is to restore an unreliable source, edit war, and issue personal attacks? Instead, you should have taken your concerns to the article talk page. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kansas Bear i restored it because a source is a source... if there was a source more reliable then we should change it, but till then, shouldn't we stick to what we have?

you can also check the arabic article of Ibn Taymiyyah, his arab origins is sourced there.

also i got blocked again on wikipedia so all of this doesn't matter now ;(

1. Articles should not be written using unreliable source(s). Therefore, information referenced by an unreliable source will be removed.

2. I don't care what the Arabic article states. Wikipedia can not be used to reference Wikipedia articles.

3. You are a sock puppet, so we are done here.--Kansas Bear (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i hate my life

@Kansas Bear can you please look up my first account on Wikipedia User talk:Ehsan iq?

i did vandalize the Iraq-Iran war page, i admit that because i didn't understand anything about Wikipedia or there laws back then, but after i got my warning i stooped, why did i get blocked after 3 hours of my warning?, also this account got blocked because i am a Sockpuppet for my original one,

can you help me out or at least tell me why did RickinBaltimore block my account? :/

would really appreciate it.

@Oshwah sorry to annoy you i understand that you blocked me and you have a right to do so.

but please i beg you to look at my first account "block" for a reason, i got a warning for a block if i tried to vandalized the iran-iraq war article and i stooped.

plz help me out...