Jump to content

User talk:ApprenticeFan/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 15

This article seems to be a newer version of an article that was deleted in the recent past. Since you left a comment on the talk page of the person who created the original article could you please look at this one to see if it should be deleted. Cheers. Ozdaren (talk) 15:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

The article should be deleted, recreated and salted after it deleted. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 11:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

ANTM 5

Since they are ex-aequo, they should share a cell.--Whadaheck (talk) 22:26, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Not needed. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 22:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Then you are putting wrong info.--Whadaheck (talk) 10:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Of course, not necessary. Please see Talk:ANTM. Thanks. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 13:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I fused the cells because it is what the new consensus seems to be on Talk:America's Next Top Model. Nobody opposed it on that page, which to me is the one that should matter. If you feel any different, please express it there.--Whadaheck (talk) 22:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Last series

There is currently nothing that says that Power Rangers: RPM is the last new Power Rangers series ever. As such, it is original research to say that any characters are the last of their kind or any show is the last of its kind. For all we know, a new series will be produced for 2011. If you continue to assert the fact that any character is the last of their type, you may be blocked.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I don't really know there would be a new season by 2011/2012. And, could you please remove the pink ranger information in Operation Overdrive Power Rangers article. Thanks. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 01:48, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
The thing is that we do not know if there is going to be a new series/season in 2011. All we know is that there is not going to be a new series next year and we have references that say that. We cannot say "There will never be a new Power Rangers ever again" which is what your edits are stating, without a reliable source to say so.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:52, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
OK, thanks for your concern about the future of the Power Rangers. Lastly, I really don't add the talkback template. That is too dull. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 02:13, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

I kindly request you reassess whether the subject of the article Gina de Venecia is notable as the article is currently written. The awarding of honorable doctorates are not notable awards themselves, therefore fails WP:ANYBIO. As an actress, the subject does not appear to pass WP:ENT. Being the wife of the Speaker of the House is not notable per WP:NN#Invalid criteria and WP:NOTINHERITED. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

FYI...

Dear AF, this is a kind note just to remind you that when you open a thread regarding another editor on WP:AN or WP:ANI you are required to inform them of it. Please keep this in mind. Thanks! Basket of Puppies 17:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Politics of Georgia

Are you sure you want this article deleted? Or do you want the redirect page Politics of Georgia (country) deleted? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

I would suggest to move the article to Politics of Georgia (country). ApprenticeFan talk contribs 02:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Done. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Sorry about that. It's been fixed. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Jaime Faith Edmondson

I recently addressed your speedy deletion request on Jaime Faith Edmondson. I have a few matters to discuss on that nomination, both procedural and content-wise.

First, technical:

  • The move was not an obstructed move (where the MediaWiki engine will not allow the move to go through). I was able to complete the move to the requested title without using administrative tools. When completing obstructed moves, admins have to confirm deletion of the page that already exists on the target location, and I was not presented with a confirmation. Please ensure that the move will definitely not go through by putting the move through all its steps and ending with a failure message before requesting speedy deletion.
  • You put the speedy tag on the wrong page. Normally, for obstructed moves, the speedy tag goes on the redirect, not the main article.

Second, content:

  • Upon closer examination, the article consistently refers to Jaime Faith Edmondson using all three names. Thus the article should reflect that. Therefore, after completing the move, I reversed myself and moved it back to the original title.

Let me know if you have any questions... SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

First, the full name should not use as an article name. Second, must use Jaime Edmondson as article name for move as my request per WP:NCP. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 02:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Jaime Faith Edmondson. Dismas|(talk) 03:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Burgess (singer) histmerge

A tag has been placed on America's Next Top Model, Cycle 13 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuffledThud (talk) 01:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

What did you mean delete the copyright in the article? Please explain. There is no link copyright violation in the article. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 04:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Just to clarify what happened here, I had already declined the speedy deletion [1] because it seemed highly unlikely that an article with that many edits could be a word-for-word copy of another site, but I left the "possible copyright infringement" notice and reported it [2] to be checked for copyright issues. The tag you removed [3] was not a speedy deletion tag. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Doh. Allow me to explain. I had just finished speedying blatant copyvios from another user, and followed their edit history to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 13. I saw large swathes of content from that article mirrored several places online, and the Facebook page looked to me like the most likely original. I neglected to check the edit dates though: your contribution was earlier than the ones I've seen elsewhere, as User:Beeblebrox has pointed out on my talk page. Sorry for the error. Best, MuffledThud (talk) 20:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Just wanted to drop by and ask a quick question. In your nomination for this redirect, you mention that the author had been creating several of these articles, however, it appears this is his/her first edit since August. TNXMan 14:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

The reason these non-notable/losing people in a reality TV show contest are no content in that page. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 14:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...

Blake Gripling (talk) 00:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Nicole Fox

Updated DYK query On November 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nicole Fox, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 01:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

RfD of Assassin's Creed III

Hello, you recently participated in an AfD for Assassin's Creed III which closed as "speedy redirect". I have created a redirect discussion to gain consensus on whether a redirect is suitable at the time, or whether it would be better to remain as a red link until more concrete information is available. Please feel free to contribute here: Wikipedia:RfD#Assassin.27s_Creed_III. Hope this helps, --Taelus (talk) 14:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Relisting notice

Per Spartaz's request, I am notifying you that this discussion that you participated in has been relisted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Una Healy (2nd nomination) in the hopes to gain a more fair consensus due to the participation of three sock puppet accounts in the earlier discussion. The three sock accounts that checkuser confirmed are the same person voted to delete or redirect and made multiple edits to the discussion which closed as "redirect" and therefore may have created a false impression of consensus by vote-stacking. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 19:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Could you please take another look at this? - Mgm|(talk) 10:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Amazing Race Map

Thank you for correcting the map about Amazing Race countries! I noticed something else: in the map about TAR 3, Austria is not highlighted, but contestants were there in Leg 7. Can you correct this one, too? Thanks and sorry if I bother you! --SimoneMLK (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Austria and Germany were visited in TAR3 as Leg 7. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 22:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

There is absolutely NO reason to do a histmerge between a mainspace article and a userspace page. Fractyl's subpage is what he thinks the article will become based on information that is not available to the general public. I have written this article from scratch using a particular publication as a source and there is no reason to have any page from the user subspace merged with the main article space.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:44, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

This is not what I meant.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 07:21, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

There is no policy or guideline that even remotely states this.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 07:25, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

I will be bringing this up on WP:ANI.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 07:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

I speedy closed it now. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 07:40, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Succession boxes

Why are you changing them all from {{succession box}} to {{s-bef}} et al.?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

See Template:S-start/doc for details. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 03:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
But these things only consist of a single line. There's no need to change it if it's not broken.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:18, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 15