User talk:Anthonyg3281

"Licensed" shows

I noticed you added sections for "licensed" shows to a few Nick articles, including Nickelodeon Animation Studio. This doesn't make sense, because Penguins, KFP, Winx, and Monsters vs. Aliens were produced at Nick's studio itself, not licensed from an external company. The wording implies that the shows were made entirely by a studio outside of Nick's parent company, Viacom. In addition to being produced at Nick's studio, DreamWorks was a Viacom company when the show deals were made and Rainbow is still a Viacom company, so Viacom didn't license these shows from anywhere else. Even further, I don't see why these shows should be separated from similar cases like the TMNT shows (using characters that Viacom acquired from Mirage Studios) and the upcoming Star Trek Nicktoon (co-produced with Viacom's sister company, CBS). It doesn't make sense to have a section heading saying "Licensed from" when the shows were made by Nickelodeon, at Nick Animation Studio. I've placed the shows back in the regular section to avoid confusion, as this section was misleading. FunhausFrank (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response, it helps me see where the confusion was coming from. The DreamWorks shows and Winx did have pages on the Nick Animation website (here are archives of Winx's page and Penguins' page for example). The recent site overhaul removed any shows that didn't have creator interviews ready, including The X's, Catscratch, as well as the DreamWorks and Winx pages, but this doesn't mean that any of these shows stopped being official Nicktoons. I also know that Nick themselves specifically said that Winx was a Nicktoon here (I'm sure they did the same for Penguins but I don't have a link with me).

As for Rabbids, Nick Animation didn't have a part in the production and you're right that the fourth season isn't involved with Nick at all. The show had Nick's financial participation for the first three seasons but no Nick staff produced it. (I moved it to 'acquired' as the company didn't produce it.) FunhausFrank (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Per WP:BURDEN: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." See also: WP:INCITE. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Let's try this again: per WP:BURDEN: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." See also: WP:INCITE. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 03:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Troubles with referencing?

Anthony, you seem to be having trouble understanding our referencing requests. References go IN the article, not in edit summaries. Readers who want to verify content are not expected to look in previous edit summaries to figure out what the source of the information is. If you don't start adding references in the various articles you edit, your privileges will be interrupted. If you're not sure how to add references, see Referencing for Beginners. Typically it's as simple as adding <ref>http://www.URL.com</ref> after the content you are adding. This is not a trivial matter, so I implore you to quickly get up to speed here, as any unsourced or improperly sourced content may be removed by other editors. Also, if you are editing while logged out, you shouldn't be doing that. Please make sure you log into your account when you edit. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hi again, I previously messaged you about the DreamWorks shows and Winx. I saw you removed Winx from the Nick Animation lists despite the seasons that were produced there. Your reasoning was that the current season is done without them "similar to Rabbids Invasion", but I'm having trouble understanding that rationale. I don't think it's a similar situation since no one from Nick Animation worked on Rabbids. Regardless, since Nick Animation did produce the show with their production team, it should stay under the lists of Nick Animation originals. And unlike Rabbids, the 8th season of Winx is still produced by a Viacom studio.

It's not exactly citable since nothing's clear-cut, but I did some looking and found that the 8th season of Winx does seem to have some Nick involvement (although their budget was apparently trimmed according to this, haven't yet found the source on that). Episodes like this still say "Music Nickelodeon Inc." in the credits and this page says that the American team is still consulted. If any change is to be made, it should be a clarifying note on the show's entry in these lists, specifying which seasons were produced as originals. FunhausFrank (talk) 21:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons, you may be blocked from editing. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 04:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 18:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please discuss the edits you want to make on the article's Talk page instead of re-adding them. So far, no attempt has been made in that regard. If this behavior continues, you may be blocked from editing. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 18:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop changing the content of the article to your preferred version. Your behavior is getting disruptive at this point. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 18:14, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note

I expanded and clarified the note for all of the shows not owned/produced by Nick, but that still have the channel named in a minor way in the credits. Things like financial participation, the channel name simply showing up in the credits, etc. don't mean that the show is necessarily a "co-production". That term, since it's really confusing, should be reserved for ones that actually had "production" involvement from Nickelodeon's studios, ex. the shows that they co-produced with DreamWorks / Klasky Csupo. Hammill Ten (talk) 01:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons. This has been an ongoing problem with you. Please stop. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 20:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 01:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 00:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 03:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shimmer and Shine, and original research

Wikipedia has a No Original Research policy. It means that you can't come to any conclusion that's not explicitly present in the text itself.

We also usually don't consider user generated sources such as Instagram to be reliable but in this case since it's the show's creator's Instagram it's fine. However, unless her IG post explicitly says the show is ending, we can't necessarily conclude that the show is ending. TV shows sometimes have wrap parties at the end of a season, even if they're going to be renewed. I don't know (or care) if the show is continuing or ending, but until there's a source saying this is the last year it will show, we should wait. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian.thomson: I looked at Nickelodeon's Upfront 2020 announcement from February 2020, and it did not mention Shimmer and Shine as one of the shows that are returning for the 2020-21 television season. Source: https://deadline.com/2020/02/nickelodeon-renewals-are-you-afraid-of-the-dark-all-that-paw-patrol-blues-clues-the-casagrandes-top-elf-1202862741/

We could really use something that actually says the show has not been renewed, rather than being silent on it. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian.thomson: This seems to explain the fate of the show since a Nickelodeon representative replied regarding a renewal. Source: https://www.facebook.com/MooseZeeOnNickJr/posts/2169549196400100

June 2020

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of programs broadcast by Nick Jr., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 03:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You’re Wrong 😭

I can not believe that Jimmy Neutron is off Nicktoons, it proves that I do not want to return to that hellhole. I can not take the aging of nickelodeon, I can’t. Where did you find out they were not playing those shows no more 😨. I feel depressed! 😭. I can not live without nickelodeon being good. I feel uncomfortable with the new shows like Casagrandes, Spongebob season 12, and Loud House. The only things to live with are Sponge and Fairly Oddparents, but I have seen it millions of time. I feel disappointed. AHHHHHHH 😨😰😭😭😭😭😭😢😢😢😢😢🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. I guess I am done with tv forever. Ginordo (talk) 02:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, The Croods: A New Age

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Croods: A New Age. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Croods 2. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Croods 2. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BOVINEBOY2008 08:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Nick Jr. original programming, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 03:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]