User talk:Anon3579

Sebastian Gorka ‎

Your recent editing history at Sebastian Gorka shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hairhorn (talk) 01:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anon3579 reported by User:Grayfell (Result: ). Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 03:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Gorka

The bit about Gorka's previous convictions for reckless driving are far too petty to be mentioned in a WP:BLP. They only way they would belong is with substantial, WP:SECONDARY sources. Digging through court documents isn't going to cut it. Propose future changes of this nature on the article's talk page. Grayfell (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to wait on secondary sources that will be coming regarding the reckless driving criminal convictions. But why remove the entire paragraph including the weapons charge and upcoming sentencing of Feb. 3, 2017, which is well sourced? (I can and will add two more sources, including the WSJ and the Hill) This charge is quite relevant. Where do you propose this paragraph go on the page then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anon3579 (talk • contribs) 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Talk page comments go top-to-bottom, and should always signed (WP:SIGNATURE) see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines for more.

The paragraph is still there, I just moved it back to "personal life and education". It's not really about his career, and there are only two secondary sources about this incident, both of which are pretty brief, so it doesn't look like it belongs in the lead. This may get more coverage, but until then it needs to be handled with care. A better place to discuss this would probably be Talk:Sebastian Gorka. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 05:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]