User talk:Andrei Stroe

Welcome!

Hello, Andrei Stroe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dunemaire 16:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Images of Romanian towns' coats of arms

Please be aware that unless you're able to demonstrate that the images you uploaded are public domain or their creator licenses them for use here, they will be deleted. Since we need those coats of arms, please proceed accordingly. Best of luck and Bine ai venit, romane ;), Dunemaire 16:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The copyrights of Coat of arms are usually not enforceable under American law, so it's ok to upload them. However, Andrei, it would be better to tag them as {{coatofarms}}. (BTW, Welcome to Wikipedia!)bogdan 17:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

I see you started to replace the copyright tags with those recommended by Bogdan - Good job. For the record, where did you find them on the web? Dunemaire 18:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

They're in my collection. Some of them I found on the ICI website (www.ici.ro, more precisely [1]). Others, I got them from [2] (but just a few and not very accurate - he has them scanned from Maria Dogaru's Heraldica Romaniei). Some I have from [3] (but again, very few are usable due to inaccuracy). Others I took them from the mayor's office website from each city and then edited them so they are a little clearer. Some I don't even remember where I found them. I have some more, but since I changed the template for the Romanian towns, the top priority was adding the ones for the towns whose pages are using that template, so it doesn't look ugly. In the next few weeks I will try and cleanup my work and add some more contributions. Andrei Stroe 19:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

As far as I recall, coats of arm are not copyrighted in Romania, hence they can't be anywhere else. Most of them wree creating in the Commnist years and they were in the public domain (it was Communism, right?), and the older ones are out of any jurisdiction by now. You did a great job.--Luci_Sandor (talk, contribs)   19:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Wouldn't it be nice to have a copyright tag that says this?(the "communist years creation = public domain") It would save a lot of trouble. Dunemaire 20:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

join our forum

Hai Andrei!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board

Bonaparte talk 21:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Coa_deva_ro.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Coa_deva_ro.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 03:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Be careful !

Bai, fi atent, ca dobitocii astia vor sa ne stearga tag-urile care spun ca suntem in favoarea unificarii Romania-Moldova, pentru ca vasazaica sunt "polemice si inflamatorii" ! Gimme a friggin' break ! Sa nu cumva sa-i lasi sa-ti modifice pagina, daca it-i vor scoate elemente din, ea, sa le pui la loc. Am sa transmit mesajul si la ceilalti Romani. Bafta. -Voievod 18:27, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Template Romanian Coat of Arms

Salut Andrei,

I've looked around and seen that according tot the Romanian law, the coat of arms of public authorities cannot be copyrighted. Acordingly, We've created a copyright template which says that, and I would like to ask you to use it for the CoA you've uploaded. It is this one Template:PD-RomaniaGov and there is a link tot the law which says that. Good Luck. Mihai -^talk 13:15, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Excellent, I've just seen that.Andrei Stroe 13:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Vaslui

Check my reply to you on Ro wiki notice board and tell me if you can take those photos, and if so, when. Thx. --Candide, or Optimism 17:10, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

I noticed that you tagged the page Image:Coa slatina ro.gif for speedy deletion with the reason "Better version available on commons: Image:Coa_Slatina_RO.gif". However, "Better version available on commons: Image:Coa_Slatina_RO.gif" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:IFD if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle 23:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Coa_focsani_ro.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Coa_focsani_ro.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A revised version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 11:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Kindly approve the deletion of your entry for Slanic's official website

Andrei, I hope you will approve of my deleting that entry of yours.

As much as I would like the town to have an official website, I am afraid www.slanic.ro is not that. It seems to me that it's only an interface to sell as many admissions to the Lake (Baia Baciului) by the local concession company as possible (also, the suggested contact is by cell phone, no name nor address is given, etc).

I acknowledge that there is plenty of interesting information on that website, but still not enough (or at least not structured in the proper way) to justify it qualifying for the 'official' title.

I am sure that this situation will improve soon, thanks to the increasingly generous public contribution, at least in the wiki domain.

Thank you much, and best of luck. Ilav. Ilavuscaen 16:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

=

I have just realized I made a mistake, as that entry was by another user. Please accept my apologies and thanks for your contributions. Regards, Ilav. Ilavuscaen 16:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Mãlina Olinescu spelling

Salut,

Please note the question at Talk:Mãlina Olinescu.

Thanks! --Amir E. Aharoni 10:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Buzău

Bună Andrei. Frumoasă poza cu răul Buzău. Aceeaşi poză apare acum şi pe ro.wp. O buzoiancă -Laurapr 08:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Buna,

A inceput un vot pentru stergerea "Wikipediei Moldovenesti", o creatie a unui Evreu-American, cu origini suspecte in Basarabia si care nu vorbeste limba wikipediei la care pretinde a fi sysop. Il cheama Node ue si pentru a crea impresia ca lumea doreste aceasta wikipedie, a apelat la toti utilizatorii rusi care au venit sa voteze de partea lui desi nu cunosc bine subiectul si li s-a spus ca voteaza pentru supravietuirea alfabetului chirilic. Asa a ajuns ca votul sa fie 31 pentru stergerea Mo wiki, si 42 impotriva stergerii - deci in alte cuvinte pentru pastrarea wikipediei in limba "moldoveneasca". Vino si voteaza aici[4] , ca sa sergem acesta creatura cu miros bolshevic, care insulta toti romanii de pe ambele maluri ale Prutului. Node ue le-a spus rusilor sa traduca mesajul lui in limba rusa si sa-l transmita mai departe. Trimite si tu mesajul acesta la toti utilizatorii romani-unionisti sau romani-moldoveni unionisti pe care-i cunosti pe en.wiki sau ro.wiki. Dapiks 23:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Translations

Hi,

Thanks for helping out with Romanian translations. As a test measure, a few articles have been created at the Romanian wikipedia. See [5]. --Soman 16:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Stuff

Hi, when you get some time, could you please list your {{POV}} concerns about this article Occupation of Bessarabia by the Soviet Union in its talk page. Thank you.:Dc76 06:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Andrei, I greatly appreciate your support. Mulţumesc frumos. Biruitorul 19:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Romanian leu

I am hoping to expand the List of circulating currencies page and so I was wondering if you could tell me what the common symbol for the Romanian leu. Just like how “$” means dollar, “€” means euro and “Fr” means franc. – Zntrip 02:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. – Zntrip 23:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Stuff

Hi, Andrei. I'm not sure if you have seen my comment here, so I'm posting it on this page as well. Thank you. Dahn 13:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi again. I see your point, and your project is laudable. However, this is one of the things I was going to look into next. This raises two issues: one is that we may both be working on it at the same time, which means that it may not be possible to use your version as a template for expansion (or, if so, only partially); also, I am working towards citing each statement made in the final article, and maybe restructuring it altogether based on what sources say (which, in turn, means that, in their final versions, the texts may only coincide very little). See his son for a comparison. I certainly don't want to to seem like I'm patronizing or discouraging you: if you still want to work on the translation, I can only commend your input. The only thing is this unexpected coincidence. If you should want instead to contribute to the other project, in any way you should consider necessary, and whenever you have the time or the interest, I would be delighted. So, it's entirely your decision. Cheers, Dahn 10:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Great! Glad to have you on board. I'll pile up my sources and either sandbox it on one of my pages or, if you allow me to, use your sandbox. What I have done in another such project is to use the {{inuse}} template as a means to avoid edit conflicts, and that way we can all edit in turns. I have some major edits in mind, since I gathered a lot of sources over the last weeks, but I'll try not to hog it. I'll start something at the vary latest on Monday, and I'm looking forward to any contributions, comments, or questions. Dahn 20:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi again, and sorry for the delays (connection problems account for most of them). I've sandboxed it here, and am looking forward to any form of feedback. Regards, and keep up the good work. Dahn 19:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed you edited in the article - where Bonaparte has copypasted my sandbox in what was a first move to delete it (yes, he must be a moron). In any case: I encourage you to edit the actual sandbox, if you should feel like it, so we get all of this in one place before we move it back there. Dahn 12:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi again. I did some redlink filling for a related article. It seems to have much to do with Buzău, so it may interest you, and you could perhaps use it/link to it in other articles. And, btw, I'm just discovering the photos you took of the city, and, judging by them, it is a very nice town. Having never visited it, I had this prejudice about it being all concrete and factories. I owe it an apology. Dahn 23:29, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Death tag

Andrei, thank you so much for taking the time to comment on my essay on the recent death tag. My response is here. Cheers! Unschool 23:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

This you might find intriguing

Hello again, Andrei. I was adding some info to Islam in Romania, and I bumped into something you might find interesting. In the "History" part, under "Early presence", in the fragment about the supposed tomb of Sarı Saltuk. I don't of course expect that tidbit to be anything other than pure legend, and neither does the source, which only lists these alternatives as proofs of a very bizarre tradition. But the very legend may be worthy of a mention somewhere in the respective article. Cheers, Dahn (talk) 23:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Ba scuze pt faza cu Guta dar ios antimanelist. NU suport sclavii astia care se intituleaza MANELISTI!!!!!! About me:" I'm a romanian bastard who likes HIPHOP and hates MANELELE aSTA-S io asa voi fi pan oi muri. PS: Esti cumva manelist???????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.82.200.158 (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Mai baiatule

Cu ce drept imi dai revert la modificari? Am dreptul sa-mi sterg contributiile. Gasca scarboasa ce sunteti. Josnic! Cred ca in viata mea nu am vazut ceva mai josnic... Ma rog, bucurati-va de privilegiile voastre. Ma gandesc eu la ceva, o sa platiti, fiti siguri. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enegrea (talk • contribs) 13:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Light cone ro.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Light cone ro.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Miluani

Hello. Regarding the move request and creation of a new category, I find those both unnecessary, and here is why. Some sort of a consensus has developed over time that on en.wiki, we don't do articles on Romanian villages, just communes; villages are sections in the article on their commune (see e.g. Brăduţ). If that's OK with you, shall we close the requested move, redirect to Hida, and create a new section there for Miluani? - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

OK, done. - Biruitorul ^Talk 16:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Request

Hello. I am the writer of the SimpleProgrammingTutorials.com website and I would like to ask you to review some articles from this resource and, if you suppose they are of appropriate quality, add links to corresponding articles of WikiPedia. You can contact me at denis.kulagin@simpleprogrammingtutorials.com. Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.39.234.101 (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for this correction. shirulashem (talk) 01:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Please make some changes

Simplified_Languages_of_Europe_map.svg

In your simplified map of languages there are some errors. I am aware that some other people have left comments of various omissions such as Breton and Sicilian. for me I will let you read those requests yourself, please could you extend the Scottish Gaelic into the top section of Scotland too, from the indent (loch ness, inverness) also the language that is traditionally spoken in the rest of Scotland is Scots, and so from the border with England please could you replace the current English to Scots. In terms of international commerce, Scottish people do speak English, but it is heavily influenced with Scots, and the official languages are therefore Scottish English, Scots and Gaelic. Thanks Luke —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukeellix (talk • contribs) 13:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi, and thank you. Good to see you around. Dahn (talk) 12:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi, am primit un mesaj cu poza lui Sorin Oprescu, la linkul [6] ce tre sa fac cu poza? ca a lui Oprescu e sigur... nu am scris ceva, dar nu stiu ce... dacxa ai timp, trimite-mi un mail la angel74dm@yahoo.com sau pe talk. Ms. Angel74dm (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing

No problem at all, Andrei! Let me begin by clarifying my exact attitude toward rowiki: I don't hate the project, I most of all dislike that it is an uphill struggle to get and maintain quality over there, this despite the commendable efforts from you and several others. Other than that, yes, I do prefer to edit here, but have nothing against cooperating - in fact, when I saw this exact translation problem you mention surfacing in other articles which "traced back to me" - that is, articles I contributed here that were translated over there -, I offered to give editors a hand in retrieving the original quotes, only to find that there was absolutely no answer to my offer (which is a shame, because I don't always have access to the same sources). I fell short of editing them in myself because it would have meant editing the same thing twice and then keeping eye on those versions on two projects. That I cannot really do, so in fact I counted on others to be interested.

All of the above means to say, in short, that I'm glad to give you a hand on this, and much flattered that you chose that as your starting point.

The easiest way for me to do this would be to render the relevant part of the quotes in the original Romanian here, for you to use and reuse as you see fit. (I don't use and actually dislike installing the Romanian keypad, so it would actually be easier for me to just render the sections with no diacritics here, and hoping that you won't mind copyediting them in during the process.)

Using this version, direct quotes in order, starting with note 10 and hoping I got it right; adapted to â spelling (implicit), where applicable, and rendered with the exact grammar found in the text (meaning that you may have to adapt the phrase which introduces them here and there); I used what they call "logical quotation", so where the punctuation mark itself is not within the quotes, it's because I only rendered a part of the phrase in its exact succession, but not entirely:

• "caracter de confesiune ori de jurnal" (note how I tweaked it in the phrase, the English needs no "de" etc. - I'm therefore rendering the whole sentence here, use as you see fit)
• "copilaria copilului universal"
• "Intamplarile sunt adevarate, dar tipice, fara adancime."
• "Personajul basmelor, al nuvelelor, al anecdotelor [here I would add "lui Creanga", but it may be superfluous with the more implicit Romanian grammar] se povesteste pe el insusi in Amintiri din copilarie, opera atat de putin populara in intentia ei."
• "Ideea de a se povesti pe sine insusi, de a prezenta etapele unei formatii, inceata insumare a impresiilor vietii, apoi sentimentul timpului, al scurgerii lui ireversibile, al regretului pentru tot ce s-a pierdut in consumarea lui, al farmecului retrait in amintire sunt tot atatea ganduri, afecte si atitudini proprii omului modern de cultura. Nici un model popular nu i-a putut pluti inainte lui Creanga, scriindu-si Amintirile, dar, desigur, nici prototipurile culte ale genului, primele autobiografii si memorii ale Renasterii".
• "Aci [sic], ca si in povestile si povestirile sale, Creanga executa trecerea de la nivelul popular al literaturii la nivelul ei cult pe o cale pur spontana prin dezvoltarea organica a unei inzestrari exercitate in intregul trecut al unei vechi culturi rurale, ajunsa acum sa se depaseasca pe sine."
• "stabil", "senin", "solar" (actually "solarul", as in "solarul protagonist", but I guess it's safe to drop the article), "nici nu exista decat in descoperirea acestui concret mirific, traditional, riguros".
• from note 17: "perfect", "situarea temporala si spatiala", "dar si toate detaliile unei lumi ingenue si pline de neastampar".
• from note 21: "chiar daca socotim ca adultul infrumuseteaza, transfigureaza, 'imbogateste' amintirile din copilarie, cum sa nu recunoastem, la Creanga, sinceritatea in induiosatoarea evocare a satului copilariei sale?" (quote marks within quotes - I went "English" here, but I think the Romanian rule would favor guillemets; just as long as you don't assume the apostrophes themselves were in the Djuvara text)
• "Si daca ne gandim la satele de bordeie din lunca Dunarii, aici ne aflam in alta tara."
• from note 27: "Amintirile lui Creanga de la scoala de catiheti ar descuraja orice candidat."
• "pastisa dizgratioasa"
• "de prisos", "dramatic"

Hope I didn't miss any, and many, many thanks for doing this. If you have any questions or comments, don't hesitate to post them on my talk page. And please be my critic if it should prove neccessary - yours is a judgment I fully trust. Dahn (talk) 11:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

• Incidentally, glancing over the ro version: the template for the wikisource thing doesn't work (a script error?) and I want to suggest either removing the bare url from the other refs or unlinking the titles - both side by side just looks weird to me, and I don't really see what they add. Unless this is a larger format convention used by rowiki, in which case just ignore me. Dahn (talk) 11:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

• One more note: "academic" does not translate as "academician(a)", but more as "universitar(a)". But you could go with "specialist(a)" or similar. I only use the English term for variation, because, since ideally we should identify what every author has for a specialty (or professional bias), three quarters of the people whom one cites in such articles would be "literary critic" or "literary historian". You are of course free to use whatever you like, it's just that I don't think the person in question really is an "academician" by the tight Romanian standards. Dahn (talk) 12:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks are really due to you (not least of all for putting up with my quirks). Indeed, Constantinescu is my translation from French, and I suppose you could do no wrong by translating one further into Romanian (especially since it looks like they only have one edition, and that is French); if it's any help, I can either provide you with the French originals or try my hand at translating them a second time from French to Romanian.

(It looks though that you've "missed a spot" - the "superfluous" quote on I. I. Mironescu is the "de prisos" in the original. When [and if] you say it's okay, I'll give the text a few other copyedits, nothing drastic: I myself it's good to have a "fresh pair" of eyes after one's been concentrating on a text, because some things otherwise ignored get a chance to jump from the page.) Dahn (talk) 11:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Andrei, I'm looking forward to other collaborations, and let me wish you a Merry Christmas for now. Best, Dahn (talk) 15:48, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

...and a Happy New Year. Dahn (talk) 21:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Andrei Stroe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Viorel Ion - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:VasileVoiculescu.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:VasileVoiculescu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Coa AlbaIulia RO.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Coa AlbaIulia RO.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Coa baiamare ro.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Coa baiamare ro.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Coa cugir ro.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Coa cugir ro.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Coa timisoara.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Coa timisoara.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Coa odorheiu secuiesc ro.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Coa odorheiu secuiesc ro.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Coa cernavoda ro.png

Thank you for uploading File:Coa cernavoda ro.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Coa Stei bh ro.png

Thank you for uploading File:Coa Stei bh ro.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 05:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Bâsca River

Salut! Andrei, TE ROG SA NU MAI INTERVII (modifici, stergi)IN ASPCETELE CE CONTIN/REDAU INFORMATII STIINTIFICE PRIVIND RAUL BASCA. MULTUMESC!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabr ro (talk • contribs)

If you yell like that in Romanian, by no means you will make people think you are right. Are you sure you know what you are saying? From the mess you made of the Nehoiu article, where you added villages that belong to the Siriu commune, I take it that you don't know that area well. For instance, did you know that Bâsca Chiojdului is also refered to as the Bâsca River? And that in Wikipedia, using self-published sites as sources is not allowed? The article uses the naming from the sources it cites and was created as such by a known specialist in hidrology. Changing the terminology without the slightest summary or talk page comment is really not right.- Andrei (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Apreciez interesul si engleza ta, dar am rugamintea sa nu te amesteci in probleme de hidrologie (debite), hidronimie(Bâsca), toponimie (Bâsca Chiojdului) pe bazinul hidrografic al raului Basca! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabr ro (talk • contribs) 13:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

With what arguments? because I can make the same request to you, especially now that I doubt you have any knowledge of the area, since you can't make the distinction between the town of Nehoiu and the Siriu commune. Will you do the same to everyone who questions your actions and sources?

I also appreciate your Romanian, but this is the English language Wikipedia and this discussion should be understood by everyone here.- Andrei (talk) 13:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Gura Teghii

Please check this our edit. You added ref name="opinia_2" without the reference description. --ŠJů (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I know about it. I need to add the full reference from ro.wp. I'll do that later today.- Andrei (talk) 08:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Hasdeu alumni

Andrei, I wonder if you could request at WP:CFR (or if you'd be all right if I made the request) to move to the simple Category:Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu National College alumni. Two reasons for this: a) to match Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu National College and b) there's only one institution with that name, so there's no need to disambiguate. Just like we have Category:Saint Sava National College alumni and not Category:Saint Sava National College (Bucharest) alumni, since there's only one Saint Sava College also. But we do have Spiru Haret National College (Bucharest) alumni, since there are three others by that name. - Biruitorul ^Talk 18:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

It is true, but you're right to revert

Indeed, it is true, and this is one of the topics missing from the article (which is very nearly crap as we stand). I've first read about this issue in Zigu Ornea's Extrema, where he mentions how the far right vilified PC as cavaler de Curlanda (the bad taste was a singular characteristic of such tribunes). Apparently, it was N. D. Cocea who first made it public, though the info I've found on this is scarce. PC himself did not hide his sexual preferences from his circle of friends, and not even from a larger audience, but he was a naturally private man in a country of bigots. Once the article moves to "higher ground", this info too will likely surface, as it should, and in any case it shouldn't probably be in the lede. For now, you're right to revert. Dahn (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Maybe my revert was a bit hasty, but that IP did the same type of contributions in ro.wp. I don't object to it being added elsewhere in the article (even with the quoted source), but not in the first sentence, that defines the subject: only information relevant to his notability should be there.- Andrei (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree, and I don't think that the revert was hasty, given the current state of the article - much more is needed before the info can also feature that sort of info. It's a lot of work though, so I thought I needed to raise the tiny issue before I consider working on the whole article. Dahn (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 03:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Translation request of Battle of Canton

Moved from User talk:Terraflorin

Hi, I got something wrong but feel preasure to ask your help. I found you contribute the Second Opium War and you worked on it. So can you translate the Battle of Canton into Romanian? Now someone has created it and you could make it better. Thank you very much.--俠刀行 (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Sînmartin, Bihor

While we're on the subject of localities, may I ask you to take a look at this discussion? A similar move took place on ro.wiki, and that may also need to be undone. - Biruitorul ^Talk

yes,it was me!

Dear Andrei,

I'd like to confirm that it was me who asked you about the account name change on ro.wp. Yes, please go ahead with the procedure you suggested. Thank you very much for all your help. Cristixav (talk) 20:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thank you very much for your help! All the best to you! Cristixav (talk) 00:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Andrei Stroe. You have new messages at Talk:Romania.
Message added Czavoianu (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(Czavoianu (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC))

Removing external link from an english webpage

Hello Mr. Andrei Stroe, Can i ask you on what base you have categorized my link addition as "spam" ? I have read all the articles related with external links policy and spam on Wikipedia and i couldn't find a similitude between my adding and any of the Wikipedia definition. Can you please explain me on which base you did and what means in "your definition" - "spam". Let's not over react in the cases where we shouldn't. I'm kindly wait for a professional (and with quote from Wikipedia policy) answer from your side. the discussion you can find it here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berca_Mud_Volcanoes

Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crocos7777 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Here, we write an encyclopedia, not a web directory, so we cannot add just any link. Only links to reliable sources that add information to the article.

That one does not: we already have pictures on Commons, we have the coordinates with a link to all possible map websites ("how to get there"), and, of course, we have information on the subject matter.

And the fact that all you did on Wikipedia is add only a link this site to several articles is textbook spam.- Andrei (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Localities in

Hi, any opinion on this: Category:Localities in Southern Bukovina, Category:Localities in Romanian Banat, Category:Localities in Crișana? On the one hand, these could get rather large (Transylvania has ~650 localities), and I can see disputes arising (is this in Oltenia or in Muntenia?). On the other hand, it could be an effective way of sorting out the country geographically. If we are to go ahead with the idea, there should be a Category:Localities in Romania by historical region. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Not necessarily a bad idea. If we go down this path and categories become overpopulated, we could probably break them down by historical administrative unit.- Andrei (talk) 16:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Claudiu Teohari si Fara Cuvinte

Salut, am vazut ca ai mentionat in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fără Cuvinte ca presa romaneasca nu prea exista si asta face foarte complicata gasirea unor surse de incredere. Incerc sa creez un articol despre Claudiu Teohari (Teo de la Deko) si am folosit surse din Adevărul, Gandul, Kamikaze si Antena 3, printre altele. Nu cred ca vreo unul din cei care contesta articolul sunt vorbitori de romana si deci nu pot citi articolele sau vedea interviurile respective. Dezbaterea e aici Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudiu Teohari. Crezi ca poti da o mana de ajutor? Multumesc.cutkiller (talk) 08:09, 07 March 2014 (UTC)

Romania's Gallery

Hi. I apologise. I am not a vandal please believe me. Galleries are not allowed? Why, because I saw exactly the same on France if I am not wrong. I only tried to improve the aspect. So I feld sad because those nice pictures were removed. I just did not know the rules. Gratzian (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Galleries are not disallowed, but they are not good for an article either, and this is an important one for a couple of wikiprojects and should converge towards WP:AC standards. Basically, an article is not a showcase for what you call "nice pictures". We have another place for that: Wikimedia Commons. So, images should be placed near a section, when they illustrate something in particular, while their caption connects each and every one to the text. A gallery just floods the article or section without an obvious connection to it, see WP:IG.- Andrei (talk) 17:34, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Romania may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• pdf do not have ID cards]. International sources give higher figures than the official census([http://europeandcis.undp.org/uploads/public/File/rbec_web/vgr/chapter1.1.pdf [[UNDP]]'s Regional

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Andrei Stroe. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 16:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Holograf

Andrei, implică-te puțin la Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holograf.Ionutzmovie (talk) 23:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andrei Stroe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Buzău into History of Buzău. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Given that I'm the one who wrote that in the first place, I don't see much of a problem. Anyway, this is just temporary. At ro.wp, I wrote a lot more details than that and it made GA, so I'm going to translate it into English too, as soon as I'm done with the main article.- Andrei (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andrei Stroe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andrei Stroe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andrei Stroe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:GhTattarescu.jpg

The file File:GhTattarescu.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Coa Manzalesti Bz ro.gif

The file File:Coa Manzalesti Bz ro.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:ROU BZ Manzalesti CoA.png which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Iasi 17th century2.0.jpg

The file File:Iasi 17th century2.0.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Gabriel Bodenehr - Iassi - 1686.jpg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:16, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Bună seara!

Bună, am fost blocată permanent de administratorii Dan Mihai Pitea și Pafsanias și mi s-au șters majoritatea articolelor pe motiv că aș fi clona lui Ark25 ( comportament similar). Nu sunt clona lui Ark25. Sunt prietenă cu el, dar toate contribuțiile de pe wikipedia sunt ale mele, făcute de mine, el doar m-a îndrumat, mi-a arătat cum să fac primul ciot și m-a ajutat să învăț sintaxa Wiki și formatele principale mai repede. Chiar m-am simțit prost astăzi când am văzut că sunt aproape toate articolele șterse, pentru că am depus muncă, energie, am consumat timp, și mi-a făcut plăcere să editez wikipedia. Majoritatea erau traduceri și în general cioturi, în special pe teme de medicină și yoga, dar am încercat să le fac cât mai frumos și mai îngrijit. Vă pot demonstra că nu sunt Ark25, sunt persoană distinctă, și pot demonstra că eu însumi am făcut toată munca de editare de până acum și că pot să fac în continuare același tip de editări. Eu am dovezi: stilul meu de editare este diferit de al lui Ark25 și pot să demonstrez inclusiv în persoană că sunt altcineva și eu nu sunt aceeași persoană cu el. Domnii respectivi consideră că imaginația lor devine în mod automat adevărul absolut și că deciziile lor nu pot fi comentate. Pentru ei, orice argument sau evidență sunt "irelevante" pentru simplul fapt că ei au puterea de a bloca. Vă rog frumos, dacă mă puteți ajuta. Mulțumesc mult! -- Arwenz (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Buna seara !

Scuze ca apelez astfel, dar am nevoie de ajutor.

Am fost blocat pe 30 august de pe Wiki.ro, pe un an, de unul din colegii abuzivi ai dumitale (un ungur). Asta m-a acuzat, din nou, de vandalism si a sters, pur si simplu, adaugirile, corecturile sau completarile mele (mai ales, traducerile de la Wiki.fra si Wiki.eng) la niste articole de pe Wiki.ro. Gestul lui nu numai ca e urat, dar e si viclean. Am constatat ca acolo unde am schimbat si alt utilizator, care e deja inregistrat, a pastrat, unguru' nu s-a atins (banuiesc pentru a nu genera ciocniri si cearta cu altii inregistrati). Dar, in alte locuri, daca nimeni altul nu a bagat de seama, imediat asta a sters, cu multa rautate, parca la foc continuu. Nu-i pasa sa citeasca, mai intai ! Il mai acuz pe ungur de abuz, caci a incalcat 3 reguli importante ale Wikipediei: https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocare#C%C3%AEnd_nu_se_poate_aplica_blocarea, https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocare#Blocarea_nu_este_o_pedeaps%C4%83 + https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocare#Blocarea_are_rol_preventiv. Daca ar fi fost supus unei anchete dure, tinand cont de astea de mai sus, ala garantat n-ar reusi sa fie convingator.

Care ar fi articolele brutalizate de el despre care vorbesc ? Uite:

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Perticari-Davila;

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A1s_S%C3%BCt%C5%91_(scriitor) - Andras Suto

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disiden%C8%9B%C4%83 (disidenta) & https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disident

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procurator

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provincia_Iudeea

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C8%9Aara_Israel (Tara Israel)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Doilea_Templu_din_Ierusalim

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqua_regia

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsk

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatolia

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.D._(miniserial)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subotica

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eu,_Claudius

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Ciseri

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilat_din_Pont

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regatul_Iuda

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defla%C8%9Bie (Deflatie)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bricolaj

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trol

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primul_R%C4%83zboi_Mondial (primul razboi mondial)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperiul_Roman_de_Apus

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C4%83scoala_lui_R%C3%A1k%C3%B3czi (Rascoala lui Rakoczi)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobon%C8%9Bi (lobonti)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evrei

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoshenq_I

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Treia_Republic%C4%83_Francez%C4%83 (a treia republica franceza)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sare_de_buc%C4%83t%C4%83rie (sare de bucatarie)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/List%C4%83_de_regi_ai_Persiei (lista de regi ai persiei)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regatul_Israel_(Samaria)

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macabei

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C8%98apte_prin%C8%9Bi_ai_Iadului (sapte printi ai iadului) si

- https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles.

La fel a facut la: https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foghorn_Leghorn.

Uita-te la istoricul fiecarui articol de mai sus, citeste, compara versiunile recente si te vei convinge. Nu poate invoca nici o scuza sau vreo explicatie credibila ! E multa inversunare si rautate in el. Nu stiu cine l-a laudat pana acum, dar rau au facut-o ! Imi amintesc ca altcineva ca el, amu cativa ani, a facut la fel si a fost alungat de pe Wiki. Te rog sa ma ierti ca procedez astfel, dar nu am de ales. 1 an blocat pe Wiki.ro, fara drept de apel ? Da, stiu ca sunt neinregistrat, dar totusi... Am incercat sa imbunatatesc ici-colea pana deunazi si mi se raspunde cu un scuipat in obraz (pe ascuns !). Pentru asa ceva, un om normal l-ar insfaca de guler si i-ar arde 7 suturi in fund, pentru magaria asta ! Deci, te rog frumos, intervin-o. Daca poti, trage-l de urechi ! Vorbeste, te rog, cu alti veterani romani-romani despre analiza asta, sa fie sigura treaba. Nu cred ca ti-ar placea sa-ti vezi efortul de cateva ceasuri (facut cu buna-credinta) anihilat, fara explicatii ori fara explicatii cinstite, in decurs de 2 secunde.

Iti (va) multumesc anticipat !

PS: Am refuzat repetat invitatiile de a deveni membru al Wikipediei, intrucat se practica aici corectitudinea politica, dar si un fel de birocratie absurda. Ca membru neinregistrat, m-am ars deja de cateva ori din partea altora deja inregistrati. Asadar, nu-mi surade ideea, mai ales ca nu se castiga bani pe aici.

PPS: Te rog pe dumneata, Andrei Stroe, dar aleg si pe: Donarius (https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilizator:Donarius) si DiaCriticul (https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilizator:DiaCriticul) - si va si rog frumos - sa completati ceea ce eu am introdus ultima data (in baza istoricului recent al articolelor indicate, facand comparatie - caci e lesne). Am incercat deja sa rog pe un batran membru de aici si am presimtirea ca nici nu-l intereseaza si nici nu va face nimic sa remedieze situatia mea.

PPPS: Pornind de la IP-ul meu de pe Wiki.ro, acel ungur, si folosindu-se de radacina IP-ului, m-a blocat nu numai pe mine, dar si pe alti cativa (nu stiu cati, caci n-am numarat). Dar, ceea ce stiu sigur e ca modificarile se intind pe 10 ani si sunt incluse chiar si pagini de Wiki.ro la care eu insumi nici nu am umblat niciodata, nici nu m-au interesat. Deci, din rau in mai rau acel ungur, membru inregistrat pe Wiki.ro, a procedat. Unde dai si unde crapa ! 2A02:2F0D:60A:A100:6DB0:AE14:5EA:18A5 (talk) 18:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)