User talk:Allmightyduck/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Allmightyduck. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Communist Party Of Australia
What I did on that page was not a test, and I have no need to use the sandbox, I have a great understanding of html. I put that shortened link there in order to decrease the size of the web page, as it could be scrolled tens of centimeters to the right due to such a long link, please restore it to how it was. 124.184.255.154 (talk) 04:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Feel free to re-do the edit yourself, but just a note, we do not use standard HTML on Wikipedia. That is just a form message too. Allmightyduck (talk) 20:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ddlogo1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ddlogo1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Your rollback request
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/December 2008#allmightyduck. SoxBot X (talk) 04:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain tools, including Huggle, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know. You might also find Twinkle useful for issuing warnings to vandals. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
I've tried to Request Page Protection with Twinkle, but I get an error that the request has been made. On edit I see, {{pp-semi|small=yes}}. I'm guessing the edit means that the page is protected, but yet anons can still vandalize the page. Any ideas? (This has been going on for a while, just check the history). --ANowlin: talk 02:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism
What defines vandalism as it pertains to this organization? I had a few edits reverted by you. I am not saying that it wasn't just to revert the edits, it just seems interesting to me that you have such a quick response to what I post.70.251.193.131 (talk) 03:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
In my mind, vandalism is anything that would look like graffiti. I an on Huggle, which automatically pulls up fresh edits to be moderated. Plus I like it! Allmightyduck (talk) 03:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
You like vandalism, or you like reverting vandalism?70.251.193.131 (talk) 03:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
REVRETING vandalism, of course! I wouldn't get rollback privileges if I caused vandalism! Allmightyduck (talk) 03:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Misuse of rollback
[1] That is clear misuse of rollback. And an incorrect warning of vandalism was also applied. [2] Please be more careful in future as this behavior frustrates good editors. --86.45.87.9 (talk) 22:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
First off, I am sorry about that! As with many vandalism fighters, we try to be fast but speedy. I guess I was a little too much of the latter in this case. Thank you for notifying me, and also, I did not use rollback, I used undo with Huggle. Although Huggle requires rollback to operate. I think it uses undo. Hmm. Once again, sorry! I will try to be more careful in the future. Allmightyduck (talk) 22:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
I agree with that. I messed up my first edit, so it may have looked like I was vandalising with my multiple edits, but I was not. I'm just trying to include something that I consider important.Dominar_Rygel_XVI (talk) 22:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
I am sorry about that. The URL appeared to look like a link to an adult website, rather than a gaming website. Please help me out by letting me know in the edit comment in the future. Sorry for the confusion! Allmightyduck (talk) 22:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi.
I'm about to undo this edit of yours, because the editor blanked the page, thereby making it speedy deletable under G7. ;) Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 00:39, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- No, I was not about to do undo your edit. Someone else beat me to it. Sorry for bothering you, then... Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 00:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
for the barnstar.... I usually feel like I'm the one who's behind on reverts. Thanks a lot! Wikipelli Talk 18:45, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Castle AFC
Evening Alllmightduck,
Whilst I appreciate your input into this subject, you must understand that our football club undergoes drastic changes season upon season. I have eradicated the squad lists as they are no longer relevant nor useful. Come next October, whole new squad lists will be added.
We love our wikipedia entry, and I am just trying to make it as complete an article as possible. I can see why this would come across as senseless vandalism, but I am actually trying to make information as accurate as possible. I am not at all experienced in editing wikipedia pages, so some of my work may be somewhat ham-fisted at first. Needless to say, of all the pages on wikipedia, this is the one I care about the most.
Thank you for your input,
Matt Caspell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.145.198 (talk) 00:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Matt, and thanks for letting me know about this! I recommend you make your own Sandbox for the page at first, as the articles should not be works in progress in the main namespace. Make sure you don't have a conflict of interest while writing. Since you said you don;t know wikicode that well, I recommend you read this article on your first article. Enjoy wikipedia! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 00:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Salt Lake International Airport
Sorry, I hit the wrong button and between you correcting it and me correcting it I may have cause you grief. Anyway I am hitting preview instead of save. Sorry, I will be more careful in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JhanJensen (talk • contribs) 22:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
No grief caused! Yep, edit conflicts happen. I recommend if you get an edit conflict, check the article before trying again. Also, sign your comments with four tildes "~". It saves Sinebot some work. Have a Nice day! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 22:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi!
Hi, I have reviewed you!Derild4921☼ 17:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HTC DesirePromo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HTC DesirePromo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Transformice logo.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Transformice logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar! :) You've beaten me to a fair few reverts yourself. It's always good to know I'm not the only one keeping the vandals at bay. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
ACC
I wish to sign up fro the ACC on toolserver. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 18:34, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Further to the reply you received by email, I just wanted to clarify a couple of points. I have nothing against automated tools per se, and you are doing great work reverting vandalism, it is just that I would have liked to have seen some sort of non automated interraction on Wikipedia outside of the realms of AWB etc. vandalism reversion. The suggestions I made are not hard and fast requirements to joining ACC, but were given as some examples of how you could help out, and show that you would make a great addition to the list of tool users. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me on my talkpage. Regards --Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 03:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Account set up help
Hi. I just created an account, as per your suggestion. Is there a way that I can have my past edits listed under my user name so that my IP doesn't show and so that I get credit for the contributions that I did before under this new name?
thanks! Republic of Texas (talk) 04:46, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
It's great you created an account, but I don't believe you can move those over. Wiki pop quiz! Add the {{helpme}} template to your talk page to get another answer to your question. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 23:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Blind use of AWB
Don't use it so blindly. Please take a closer look at edits with it before you do them - it's not a tool to be used without user assistance, and the responsability is on the user, not the tool. RN 14:48, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry I went wrong, and I do know the technology assist policy, but where did I go wrong? Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 14:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
You messed up the inline referencing a bit on Microsoft. Appreciate the typo fixing though - it isn't that big of a deal, just pay extra attention and don't assume the tool is flawless, they toned down full AWB bots for a reason, you know...
Anyway, thanks again for the typo fix and also pointing out some of the newer wikilinking features, and thanks for the response. (one example: One of the things was moving a reference for a paragraph before others, indicating it's a reference for the last sentence and not general reference for the paragraph) RN 14:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Long overdue, but I apologize if I seemed terse and I'm completely wrong in my last statement (on the 9th). Only mistake you made was using such a short edit summary with the tool with so many changes. Here's a toast to you! Don't get down about it :).RN 18:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
False positives...
I had recently received a notice from you concerning edits and/or editing that constitutes vandalism. I wish to point out that I have already contacted Wikipedia and let them know that I have never gone to the pages mentioned in the "messages" section that comes up when I click on Wikipedia, as they appear to be coming from my ISP gateway number. I am on satellite Internet service and would appreciate in future that you verify that the edits and accusations that you appear to be blaming me for, are indeed, coming from my specific computer useage. If not, I suggest you refrain from making unsubstantiated accusations.
Maple wych Maple wych (talk) 19:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
First off, please calm down a bit. We're all friends here. It seems that your ISP uses a shared IP. Since this edit came from an account, this should no longer be a problem. There is no "blame" here. I recommend you read WP:IAD. If you received a block from editing because of this, it wasn't meant for you. I have no way to "...verify that the edits and accusations that you appear to be blaming me for...". That ability if possessed by very few, and it seems this should no longer be an issue, because you have created an account. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 22:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- I can only echo the above. I'm an administrator and even I don;t have the ability verify who is behind the string of numbers. Now that you've created an account, provided you have a strong password, all edits you make while logged in will be attributed to you, so if somebody at the same IP address as you is making a nuisance of themselves, you won't be affected by the measures we take to control vandalism. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
UGG boot
Almighty - you suggest that my edit of the UGG boot page introduced factually incorrect matter. It did not - can you kindly let me know what you object to so we can discuss? this seems to be a very contentious page and I don't really get what the deal is - aussie's view these things as "ugg boots" but the rest of the world sees UGG as a brand. the article doesn't get this across - it only takes the aussie view. I assume you are aussie, and please don't take it so personally, but in the US, UK and elsewhere, people really see UGG as a brand. Probably because Deckers advertises so much, but it is what it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erehwon37 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I don't really object, and I'm not Aussie :). This might be a good candidate for a Disambiguation page, as it can easily confuse. Feel free to re-do your edit, and leave an edit summary saying something about it. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- Also, read what Tyrol5 said. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Minor but anyway Quorum of Seventy Evangelists
Are you certain of that typo correction you made on Quorum of Seventy Evangelists? I was facing with the same one and I thought it might be an odd way to spell a name. As I couldn't find the source I decided to leave it. Did you find the source? --Muhandes (talk) 06:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Now that you ask, no. I did not find the source, I figured most of the names were not something Middle Easteren, which I usually steer clear of. I've reverted the edit. Thanks for letting me know! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 14:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Five Finger Death Punch are not Thrash. They're Groove in vain of Pantera. If you link the allmusic site, it'll say so. Heavy/Groove/Nu metal. That's it. Please stop changing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.16.7.154 (talk) 16:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- "Caesar" is a valid English spelling, as in Julius Caesar; it may also be spelled Cæsar with æ, as in "Encyclopædia". Chzz ► 09:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Invited
Hello, Allmightyduck! I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Apple Inc. We work on improving Apple Inc. articles and would appreciate your help. Thanks, —mono 04:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Dez Bryant
http://guyism.com/2010/07/cowboys-rookie-dez-bryant-refuses-to-carry-roy-williams-pads.html
I think my inclusion of stating Dez Bryant doesnt like carrying pads is fairly well known. There is nothing in the statement that he doesnt like carry pads that contradicts statements made on ESPN, Yahoo Sports, CNNSI, etc.
This is a commonly known fact. Excluding it is suspicious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.6.88.129 (talk) 02:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- OK, Re-do it. I won't intervene :) Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 03:36, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
ADM
Hey, there are more vandal edits on Archer Daniels Midland. See if you can find them :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.2.223.71 (talk) 16:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- You know, vandals don't usually tell anti-vandals there was vandalism we missed. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 16:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't complain, otherwise we wouldn't have known about it ;) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- But then... this means... I HAVE TALK PAGE STALKERS! RUN! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 16:32, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't complain, otherwise we wouldn't have known about it ;) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Veterans' Employment and Training Service
Thank you for experimenting with the page Veterans' Employment and Training Service on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Wirtz Library (talk) 03:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Seriously? I added the agency logo to the page and you tag me with making bad edits? Really? Wirtz Library (talk) 03:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, calm down, you made the change again and I realized I was in error. I'm sorry for any confusion. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 03:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Post
Those quotes were real Sir.
Snoop Dogg did indeed say that as well as Chris Kanaszka of SummersFault —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.3.51.1 (talk) 03:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Please provide a reliable source before re-introducing that material again. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 03:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Are you accusing me of sockpuppetry?
Open up a case if you are concerned. Furthermore, do not revert my edits, take to the talk page. Dmund chluessel (talk) 03:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- I'm confused, and not accusing you of WP:SOCK. You replace the text of the page with "I'm going to delete this rubbish." You cannot delete that, plus it's not even your own userpage. I'm guessing you are trying to pose as a Sysop, but I hope I'm wrong. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 03:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
-- φ OnePt618Talk φ has given you a pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating! Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
|
Thanks for stalking my page and contributing that comment! Appreciated!-- φ OnePt618Talk φ 03:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- I've never had WikiPie! Thanks! Mmm... Essence of vandals... Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 03:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
RFPP
Thanks. I did all the pending requests. Always happy to help out. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to say...
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, *puts on sunglasses* It's what I do. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 15:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Reply
Yes, users may blank their talk page as evidence that they have read them... remember, there is always the page history- they cannot evade the system. Tommy! [message] 16:24, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- I know, but what about something like Huggle? It wouldn't know. Is there a link to that policy? I've never heard of it until now. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 16:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yea, one sec. Tommy! [message] 16:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I tried to say this on Tommy2010's talk page, but was beat by his message saying he had replied here: You can't get your own talk page deleted (guideline subsection) but you can remove messages that are not certain things (guideline subsection, supplemental essay) ("certain things" doesn't include warnings). dffgd talk·edits 16:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's WP:BLANKING .. easy enough Tommy! [message]
- Okeydoke! Gave him some pie! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 16:40, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Removal of Warnings
Thanks for the warning :) Tsumetai (talk) 22:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- Irony, :). No problemo. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 23:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Haha, is this spreading now? :) dffgd talk·edits 02:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, getting the word out, Thanks to you! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- And you have another talk page stalker! dffgd talk·edits 02:33, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, right now it's you and User:SuperHamster. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- And you have another talk page stalker! dffgd talk·edits 02:33, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, getting the word out, Thanks to you! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Haha, is this spreading now? :) dffgd talk·edits 02:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK query
Hello! Your submission of Videogum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smartse (talk) 16:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Club the Yates 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Club the Yates 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HTC DesirePromo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HTC DesirePromo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
re: WikiAlerter
Hey there, sorry for the late reply. I've added you to the approved list for WikiAlerter. Please let me know if you have any problems, and I'm happy to hear any feedback you may have. Cheers, - Kingpin13 (talk) 01:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Kingpin13 (talk) 03:51, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
You tagged this article for speedy under criterion A2, foreign language article; I declined it because you didn't provide a link to a foreign language article. Would you please restore the tag along with a link to the foreign language article? Nyttend (talk) 16:02, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
- News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports
- In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed
- WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
WikiProject Apple Inc. August 2010 Newsletter
Project news
|
|
New articles
|
Featured article
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Mono at 01:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC).
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment
As you commented in the pending closure discussion I am notifying you that the Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment is now open and will be for two weeks, discussion as required can continue on the talkpage. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:38, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
... for cleaning my user page and for beating me to AIV! -- Timberframe (talk)
- Don't thank me *puts on second pair of sunglasses*, Thank Huggle. And sort of me :) No problemo! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong?
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Talkback
Message added 00:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Welcome
Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Articles for creation! We are a group of editors who work together on the Articles for creation and Images for upload pages.
A few tips that you might find helpful:
- Please take time to fully read the reviewers' instructions before reviewing submissions.
- The project's discussion board is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.
- Article submissions that need reviewing can be found in Category:Pending AfC submissions and there is also a useful list which is maintained by a bot.
- You might wish to add {{AFC status}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. There is also a project userbox. If you haven't done so already, please consider adding your name to the list of participants.
- Several of our members monitor the #wikipedia-en-help connect IRC channel, and you are welcome to join in.
Once again, welcome to the project. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
Nice trick, huh? Putting a link to an article talk page into an edit summary. Steal it. That is how you address dissent on moving categories. Synonyms sometimes carry more weight. They do not carry bias. If you want to support your position that synonyms do carry bias, do it there, in the blue heading link, above. 68.148.103.90 (talk) 21:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Rihanna Wait Your Turn.png==
Thanks for uploading File:Rihanna Wait Your Turn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Notice
Hi. This is Alexandree. I am contesting the proposed deletion of my post. I have posted a page about Sassa Brown, who is a singer and a writer. I am a big fan of hers and think that she deserves the page. You could even message her and ask if it is okay. I'm positive she would say so. She has a music page set up with several songs right now. It is found at http://www.myspace.com/549291717 She is also the subject of other fan blogs, such as one I found on blogspot.com The actual link is http://sassafanblog.blogspot.com/ She has two books published, Reflections of My Soul and Search for an Identity. She is very talented, and I think that she deserves her own page. Her fans should be able to find information on her so they can know more about her. All the information in my post is correct and can be found in the sources I've mentioned above. Her books are also selling online and will be hitting stores soon. For now you can check it out and see that I'm not lying. www.cafepress.com/sassysassa and www.cafepress.com/SassaFanPage She has two albums, one called Wonder Woman and one just released on her music profile today called Overload. Please check all this out and see that I am not lying and keep this post about her. I really think she deserves her page and her fans deserve to see it and to be able to post other stuff they know about her. I've even gotten a review of my page in the discussion tab.
Alexandree (talk) 02:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Alexandree
- I bet Sassa ia glad you are a fan of her music, but there are a few standards that things must meet to be on Wikipedia:
- If you want some more tips on how to not get your article deleted, please check out WP:FIRST and the Article Wizard. If you want other contributors to expand your page, try Articles for Creation. I hope you like Wikipedia! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Talkback
Message added 22:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
just a heads up about your user page
- A screen capture of your user page on my monitor at work is here. You might wanna revise it a little... • Ling.Nut 00:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oof. Glad to see Google Chrome, like me, but I use a 17-inch Monitor. Oof. All I can say. Thanks for pointing it out! I'll look into it. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 00:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- As a bit of a test, could you tell me if User:HJ Mitchell looks odd like this? Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 00:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- The very top of that page probably doesn't look quite the way the editor thinks it does, but it is at least readable. Further down, everything looks OK (in terms of being readable), except in one place where a cookie covers a barnstar. • Ling.Nut 01:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
Dear Allmightyduck (wow; that's a cool name), I wanted to thank you sincerely for voting in my RfA. I appreciated it thoroughly. Thanks and warm regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message added 00:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message added 22:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
st joseph mascot
why is the edit being removed? i have explained the edit and it continues to be removed. mascot was changed based on a vote by student council. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.64.86.150 (talk) 01:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- By the looks of it, this is a humorous Facebook fan page. Sources need to be reliable, especially if they are controversial, like this one. If you have a link from the school website, or something similar, the edit can be done being reverted. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 01:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism Warnings
Not quite sure why an IP shouldn't be giving an established user level 4 warnings, when he's clearly vandalizing my talk page, and even taunting me about it. IPs have rights too! --70.242.164.14 (talk) 01:56, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- As I looked more at the above notices, saw they were a sockmaster, etc, I did realize that. Anyways, I guess I didn't see a level 1, 2, or 3 leading up the the 4. It didn't technically fall under WP:VAND, and you always gotta Assume Good Faith! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Then where do you suggest I take this? Admittedly, I didn't give him "formal" warnings, and doing so probably would've led to more problems for me, but I thought I made it pretty obvious that I didn't appreciate my user page being blanked with my revision comments. I'm open to suggestions... lol. --70.242.164.14 (talk) 02:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- I'm thinking the best way would to be approach them in a friendly manner, assuming good faith. Remind them of WP:BLANKING, and hope for the best. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Or consider dispute resolution. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Then where do you suggest I take this? Admittedly, I didn't give him "formal" warnings, and doing so probably would've led to more problems for me, but I thought I made it pretty obvious that I didn't appreciate my user page being blanked with my revision comments. I'm open to suggestions... lol. --70.242.164.14 (talk) 02:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
I would like you to explain to me the meaning of "unconstructive" please. And why are you reverting my edits to that article? I do a huge effort, invest my own time into this and you call me akin to a vandal. That's not very nice, you know... 173.178.64.99 (talk) 02:04, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Well, you did remove almost half the pages content (size wise) and an image. Try to keep the infobox there. I undid my edit. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 02:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't see the point of it because I put a redirect to French Canadian for the ethnic group. "French-speaking Quebecers" are not an ethnic group. 173.178.64.99 (talk) 22:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yup, you're right. Sorry! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 22:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't see the point of it because I put a redirect to French Canadian for the ethnic group. "French-speaking Quebecers" are not an ethnic group. 173.178.64.99 (talk) 22:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Adopt-a-user reminder
Hello, I have completed a general cleanup of the adopter information page for the adopt-a-user project, located here. During my cleanup, I have removed several inactive and retired users. In order to provide interested adoptees with an easy location to find adopters, it is essential that the page be up-to-date with the latest information possible. Thus:
- If you are no longer interested in being an adopter, please remove yourself from the list.
- If you are still interested, please check the list to see if any information needs to be updated or added - especially your availability. Thank you.
- You are receiving this message because you are listed as an adopter here.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 03:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC).
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
License tagging for File:RockyHorrorGleeShow.png
Thanks for uploading File:RockyHorrorGleeShow.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
Hi, I see you have been trying to help out on WP:FFU. When users want to upload images of logos or covers these are used under fair use, and we do not care about any license, (unless it is soon to be public domain. So instead of looking and asking for a link to license information, you can upload it if it can be used in an article, and it looks genuine. This actually covers a lot of the requests. Also for logos and covers the upload form caters for the fair use, so we don't have to ask for that. We only need fair use rationale if it is an obscure reason. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- OK, although are you saying that if it would be Fair Use, that we have to write the FUR? What if they have an album cover and they didn't provide a FUR anyways? Still ask them to write it? But, if it's merely a logo, just sort of do the "standard" logo FUR? Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 16:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Good morning again, what I am trying to say is that what we are doing at WP:FFU is that we are helping the new people to do things. Usually they have no clue about fair use rationale (or of the the license either). This means that if the fair use criteria are obvious, eg for covers and logs then we can fill them in for the requester. This applies to album covers too. Eg for one album cover in an article about that album, that is fair. The exceptions I am talking about is for pictures where use is unclear, eg historic, or for dead person, or for promotional material, or where there are lots of fair use images in the article already, then we can ask why the requester thinks it is fair to use it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Got it. Sort of like what I did in the below section, except remember to add a license tag ;) Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 23:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- It would be good for the image tagging bot to be a bit smarter, see what fur template is in use and make up an appropriate license to go on. Your work looks good. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Got it. Sort of like what I did in the below section, except remember to add a license tag ;) Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 23:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Good morning again, what I am trying to say is that what we are doing at WP:FFU is that we are helping the new people to do things. Usually they have no clue about fair use rationale (or of the the license either). This means that if the fair use criteria are obvious, eg for covers and logs then we can fill them in for the requester. This applies to album covers too. Eg for one album cover in an article about that album, that is fair. The exceptions I am talking about is for pictures where use is unclear, eg historic, or for dead person, or for promotional material, or where there are lots of fair use images in the article already, then we can ask why the requester thinks it is fair to use it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
RFA vote template
I don't know what template you're using to add your votes to RfA's, but it appears that it's not substing correctly (or maybe you forgot to subst it). Check out your recent vote at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Looie496. It looks fine on the page, but if you edit the page you'll see all kinds of parser function shrapnel. SnottyWong babble 03:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks like you just forgot to subst your template. You might want to go take a look at that and re-subst this. SnottyWong express 03:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. I switched to typing it out for now. I only wrote that template to practice parser functions, and it looks like I need some more practice ;). Thanks again, Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 15:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, fixed it with some safesubst action. Thanks again for the heads up! Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 15:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. I switched to typing it out for now. I only wrote that template to practice parser functions, and it looks like I need some more practice ;). Thanks again, Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 15:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)