User talk:Alexf/Archive 29

Archive 25

←

Archive 27

Archive 28

Archive 29

Archive 30

Archive 31

→

Archive 35

RTÉ Pulse

Alex, Thank you for your speedy response to the vandalism on the RTÉ Pulse wiki, could you tell me what is being done? I saw the message posted on the user 79.97.57.31 talk page about contacting the ISP NTL Ireland, however I would like to know if the RTÉ Pulse page will be protected from further abuse from this user?
BenSlimm (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

The IP Address was blocked. The page does not need protection as it has very low vandalism levels at this time. -- Alexf^(talk)

Hello

please can you look link in the end of Azita Bijol Hedayati page deleted and check out that she is really painter which she had several exhibitions so far and that her works are really unique.In the site you can find more links to informations about her work and also you can look them.I believe she deserves at least few words on wikipedia and maybe a link which could show her works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmashina (talk • contribs) 15:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

A painter with "unique" work is not enough. It was properly deleted as it failed notability as written. Specifically WP:ARTIST. It seems to me, from your request, that you want to do some advertising for this artist. Please understand Wikipedia is not a place for promotion. -- Alexf^(talk) 02:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 May 30

Hi, 2019 Pacific hurricane season is certainly premature with a good dose of WP:Crystal but it's not, IMHO, a G3 hoax. It would be helpful if you would kindly reinstate the page to allow this discussion to come to a conclusion. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Done. -- Alexf^(talk) 01:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi... Good Day..

I would like to request to have my Vanilla Labyrinth information I typed.. my original copy is lost.. and my only source was the data I encoded here in Wiki.. please inform me if you have done any action to my concern.. thank you and have a nice day..~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dukemojaro (talk • contribs) 16:54, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Article has been Userfied at: User:Dukemojaro/Vanilla Labyrinth as per request. Next time please follow directions and add a red link as requested at the top of the edit page here, Thank you. -- Alexf^(talk) 17:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of User talk archives

Quick question ... it looks like someone was successful in getting their user talkpage archives deleted (as an example), although this is typically against policy. They were marked as G7 (one editor) yet they didn't seem to meet that ... was I missing something, or are my eyes just fuzzy this morning? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh? Did I screw up? I thought (understood) on a quick read of the request that it was for renamed pages left overs. Now I'm confused. Please confirm on what you see and if wrong I'll undelete. Thanks! -- Alexf^(talk) 12:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Andreas Neocleous & Co LLC deletion

Hi Alexf

My name is Lefteris and today I have started writting an article regarding Andreas_Neocleous_&_Co_LLC I am really trying to make it comply with all wikipedia rules. I was trying to find some more references to enrich the article and make it to look a bit more encyclopaedic, but I found out that it was deleted. Can you help me find out what was that think that made the article look like an advertisiment and made administrators to delete it? I was reading similar articles in wikipedia before start writting.

I really appreciate it, thank you in advance for you time.

Lefteriswebmaster —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lefteriswebmaster (talk • contribs) 12:49, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

The article was deleted for advertising and lack of assertion of notability. You say you were surprised, yet you had been advised of the problems with the article and that it was slated for deletion here. The editors that notified you clearly explained the reasons to you. Is the company notable? Can you show reliable references? Please read WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ for guidance. If you think you can work on it please let me know and I will userfy it for you. Have a good day. -- Alexf^(talk) 15:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Reza Udhin

Hi,

I recently put up an article on Wiki for the musician and producer REZA UDHIN.

It appears that the article was speedy deleted according to rule A7.(I can't work out how to post the link for you, but it was deleted today).

Maybe I posted it on the wrong section but I would like to get an article up for Mr Udhin, as I believe he is an accomplished and extremely successful musician and producer and deserves a page on Wiki, so I and other fans of his work and press can access it for immediate information.

He was the founder member of the band INERTIA who have been in existance for over 18 years and have toured throughout the World, with over 11 releases to their name. He is also a member of the legendary Rock group KILLING JOKE.

It appears all the other members of this band have their Wiki pages apart from Reza, it also appears that other members of INERTIA have Wiki pages apart from the man started it all.

He also runs an extremely successful record label and has produced and remixed countless bands and artists. Which is why I think he derserves a spot on Wiki.

If you could re-instate the page or tell me how to post the page (if I have done it incorrectly, it would be highly appreciated.

Thank You.

Alexys —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryonica1 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

The article was removed due to lack of assertion of notability. You were informed here of the problems with it before deletion. Just because a band exists does not make it notable. If you have reliable sources, and after reading the aforementioned links you think it has merit, I could userfy it for you. Please remember to sign your posts with four tildes. Thank you. -- Alexf^(talk) 16:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Mammothfest page deletion

Hi Alexf, I have just had a page I put up which is about a festival going on here, I don't really see how it is advertising when I wasn't going out of my way to get links in or mention the bands playing or anything.

Mammothfest

If you can clarify what difference this is to any of the other festival pages that would be great for future notice.

Kind regards, James

It read like an ad. Even if it wasn't, and I restored it, it would have to be removed for lack of assertion of notability and verifiability (see A7). There were no references or any reliable sources, just one from their own website. It said that it is a new, currently ongoing festival. Does it have any history? Does it have any writings in newspapers or other references? As per any other festival article, they do not count as any article has to live on its own merits. -- Alexf^(talk) 12:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Okay so if I referenced magazines, newspapers and when it has some history (as in after the official event) then it would be okay to write it up on Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambo86 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

It might. Read Notability (events) and Notability (organizations) for details on what's needed. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

why did you delete my article about Asanja.com?

Hello,

I noticed that you removed my article about an African social network, asanja.com.

I trully do not understand why, there are quite a few other pages about social sites with less registered members on Wikipedia. Did you delete it because it is about an African social network and you believe there are not enough Africans on the web that may be interested in the article?

I read your page about the potential reasons why you deleted my article:

1) I'm not affiliated with the site 2) The article is not advertisement, and I'm not against the site either. I just believe that it is good that Africans are building websites that are quite popular. 3) Asanja has over 100,000 members, there are many other social sites that have a page on Wikipedia that have far less members. 4) I used a structure very similar to other pages. 5) I provided a reference (I can add more but it'll take me time to find good ones)

Please reconsider the deletetion

Numaya

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Numaya2010 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

The deletion was explained in the summary and clearly in the two heads-up messages you received in your Talk page, placed by the editor that nominated it. The article had problems. You were advised. Instead of asking and engaging the nominating editor to see what to do better, you immediately recreated the same article. It was nominated again, you were informed again and it was deleted again by another admin. I did not delete it because of any bias or consideration of enough readership as you stated. Wikipedia is not censored. It was simply done following policy, especially lack of assertion of notability (see also Notability (web)). -- Alexf^(talk) 12:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Please re-delete Kyle Belton

I was removing unsourced BLP info when you deleted and our edits apparently crossed so that I recreated the article inadvertently. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Done. -- Alexf^(talk) 21:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of 4TROOPS page

Hello. You have deleted my page about the ban 4TROOPS. They are signed to a major label - Sony Masterworks - and are currently have a one hour television special airing nationally on PBS. I did not mention the PBS broadcast in my article. Would the article be more relevant if I did? They have also gotten press coverage on national outlets including ABC Nightline, The View, Good Morning America, CNN, Parade Magazine, and People Magazine.

Thank you.

4TROOPS—Preceding unsigned comment added by Saracrewe123 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Article has been userfied at User:Saracrewe123/4TROOPS for you to work on. Good luck. -- Alexf^(talk) 00:43, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

I have made the suggested changes. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saracrewe123 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

How will I know if my article is still being considered for publication? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saracrewe123 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Your first article, especially the Things to avoid and And be careful about... sections. Ask other editors that have written or collaborated in successful similar articles to take a look and offer advice; (I am not a copy editor so I will not be available). Above all, research and respond to any tag placed in the article you are writing (I see it already has gathered one concern, as of this writing). Also read the fundamental principles of Wikipedia. Please remember to sign your posts with four tildes. Thank you. -- Alexf^(talk) 23:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Ekarfi13

Hi Alexf. I noticed you blocked Ekarfi13 (talk · contribs) for disruptive editing earlier this week. He continues to make the same kind of random changes to articles as 195.132.185.48 (talk · contribs). Would you mind taking a look? Thanks. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Has not edited since June 3. Last warning was on June 4. In any case, you are an admin so you know what to do :). -- Alexf^(talk) 11:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Has edited on the 4th, 5th, and 6th of June. He's still doing it, as 195.132.185.48 (talk · contribs), as of a few minutes ago. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Seems to be the same person in the referenced IP address, yet I don't see open vandalism in the IP's recent posts, maybe content disputes, but not AIV material. -- Alexf^(talk) 20:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

69.94.161.172

Thanks for blocking 69.94.161.172. This user had a history of vandalism. Nolelover (talk) 15:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

User_talk:Rameshti

It is my old talk peg now I creat an new acount see here> User:Rameshti. So that you can delet this page my new talk peg see here>User_talk:राम प्रसाद जोशी thanks! --राम प्रसाद जोशी (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

No. As explained in your Talk page, accounts are not deleted. You could exercise your right to vanish, but I guess that's not what you want, if you created a new account. Just leave the old account be. Change the password if you want. Or mark it as a Doppelganger account. -- Alexf^(talk) 21:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

User name question

Can you have a look at MJProtector (talk · contribs) not sure it is a blatantly obvious violation of username policy but looks like given the creation of Heal The World In Loving Memory Of Michael Jackson think it may need looking at.

Thanks Codf1977 (talk) 11:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

It is not a username policy violation. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem - just wanted some to check it out. Codf1977 (talk) 11:32, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of CVISION Technologies

I had recently wrote an article for CVISION Technologies. I was just wondering why the page was deleted. I am very up to date in the technology software sector and I notice that a lot of other companies that are similar to cvision has their own wiki page and I had wanted to create a similar page for cvision. Do you think you can let me know what things I could change in the wiki page so that it will not violate any of the rules because I truly believe that cvision is deserving of their own wiki page. Kyeung123 (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm surprised you asked that when you were informed about the problems with the article three different times, by different editors in your Talk Page, here, here and here. Furthermore, you were answered this question and pointed to pages that will help you in the comments by User talk:A More Perfect Onion/Archive 1, specifically in Item #88 CVISION. To make it easier, I will point you again to pages you should read. I recommend reviewing Your First Article, notability guideline for companies, and about reliable sources. Also about the notability requirements for companies and the issues with advertising and why it is not welcome. To address your point about other similar articles, please understand that they are immaterial and have no relevance. Each article must live on its own merits. Can you write about this company? Yes, if it is notable and you are not promoting it. Lastly, next time please be so kind as to read the notice at the top of this edit page and provide a red link as requested to make it easier to find. Thank you. -- Alexf^(talk) 16:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Tapeandmedia.com

Alexf,

This has been removed b/c it ppears I am barking up the wrong tree for info!

Thanks! (Fatbodynumbertwo9 (talk) 18:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC))

Excentric - userspace

Hello! you deleted Excentric (band) but can you please recreate it in my userspace User:KzKrann/Excentric? Thanks - KzKrann (talk) 23:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Done. -- Alexf^(talk) 23:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. KzKrann (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Quickswitches

Hi Alex, I'm not too sure how to write a wikipedia article, but this information is certain noteworthy.

if you go here http://blog.quickswitches.com/ and watch this video, this device pretty much opens up djing to another world. The nature of midi controllers aren't new, but I'm trying to word what sets this apart.

any help appreciated.

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turntableknowledge (talk • contribs) 12:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry but I'm not about to read any more blogs (I already subscribe to too many feeds and am behind in my reading). In any case, it is not a matter of what I would say after reading a blog or watching a video as both are self-published sources and not acceptable as reliable sources. The article was deleted because it read like advertising, as indicated to you in your talk page by the nominating editor. The links provided have enough information to show you what the problem was. To help you as yuy requested I would suggest you read Your First Article and the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. This should give you an idea. Regards. -- Alexf^(talk) 13:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorbact(R)

Did you read the "talk" page, which substantiates the value and credability of this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.43.110.74 (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes and it had nothing to do with the deletion reason. Did you read about no advertising and the G11 speedy deletion reason? Did you also read the notice at the top of this page asking for a red link and to please sign your posts? Please read those documents, then if you want, we can discuss further. Notice: userfying an article, even though it's possible, it will not be done to an IP address. Consider getting an account if you require it. -- Alexf^(talk) 20:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

I read the suggested information, and am confident I am not violating any of these guidelines. Alex, consider reading the expert report with numerous references at http://www.abigo.se/en/products/sarosvamp/sorbact/expertrapp.html , then comapare to the page which was deleted. They are the same. Sorbact(R) is not just a product, it is a method, mechanism, and paradigm shift in the way wounds are treated. The page which was deleted was an educational peice on the Sorbact(R) technology, which is certainly novel and noteworthy considering its impact in the healthcare field. my account was deleted, so I sign like this right ````

The mentioned website, being the maker of the product is a self-published primary source, therefore not acceptable as not reliable. Furthermore the article name violates the Manual of Style with respect to trademarks. Lastly, accounts are not deleted, so you are mistaken in your assertion. To sign your posts, please your four tildes (~~~~). -- Alexf^(talk) 23:45, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Alex, the website was for you to easily find the listed credible references. Your assumption of unreliability is incorrect. If you again visit the webpage, you will see all authors and references which I have included below, including the prestigious Journal of Wound Care (JWC):

Sorbact® JWC Ljung Å, Yanagisawa, Wadström T, Journal of Wound Care vol 5; no 4; April 2006.

Using the principle of hydrophobic interaction to bind and remove wound bacteria.

“A hydrophobic dressing is a non-allergic, non-toxic alternative for reducing the microbial load of open wounds without enhancing nosocomial spread, and can reduce the use of antibiotics. Hydrophobic microorganisms bind to the dressing, preferably in a humid environment, and removed with it. They multiply to quite a low extent when absorbed in the dressing, and may not produce extracellular toxins and enzymes. Mechanisms of resistance to hydrophobic interaction have not been described.”

Additional refferences supporting Sorbact and The Sorbact Method

Åsa Ljungh, MD, PhD, and Torkel Wadström, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Microbiology, Dermatology and Infection, Lund University, Sölvegatan 23, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden References 1. Hjertén S, Wadström T. What types of bonds are responsible for the adhesion of bacteria and viruses to native and artificial surfaces? In: Wadström T et al (eds) Pathogenesis of wound and biomaterial-associated infections. Springer Verlag, London, 1990, p 245-53. 2. Ljungh Å, Hjertén S, Wadström T. High surface hydrophobicity of aggregating Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from human infections studied with the salt aggregation test, SAT. Infect Immun 1985;47:522-6. 3. Ljungh Å, Österlind M, Wadström T. Cell surface hydrophobicity of group D and viridans streptococci isolated from patients with septicaemia. ZBl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg 1986;A261:280-6. 4. Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (eds). Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. ASM, Washington DC, 1990. 5. Hazen KC, Hazen BW. Surface hydrophobic and hydrophilic protein alterations in Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;107:83-8. 6. Faris A, Wadström T, Freer JH. Hydrophobic adsorptive hemagglutinating properties of Escherichia coli possessing colonization factor antigens (CFA/I or CFA/II), type 1 pili, or other pili. Current Microbiol. 1981;5:67-72. 7. Ljungh Å, Wadström T. Fimbriation of Escherichia coli in urinary tract infections. Comparisons between bacteria in the urine and subcultured bacterial isolates. Current Microbiol 1983;8:263-8. 8. Wessels JGH. Hydrophobins: proteins that change the nature of a fungal surface. Adv Microb Physiol. 1997:38:1-45. 9. Wadström T, Ljungh Å. Pathogenesis of wound infections. In: Altmeyer P (ed) Wound healing and infections. Springer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1995. 10. Jonsson P, Wadström T. Cell surface hydrophobicity of Staphylococcus aureus measured by the salt aggregation test (SAT). Current Microbiol 1984;10:203-10. 11. Ljungh Å, Wadström T. Growth conditions influence expression of cell surface hydrophobicity of staphylococci and other wound infection pathoens. Microbiol Immunol 1995;39:753-7. 12. Liang OD, Ascencio F, Vazquez-Juarez R, Wadström T. Binding of collagen, fibronectin, lactoferrin, laminin, vitronectin and heparan sulfate to Staphylococcus aureus strain V8 at various growth phases and under nutrient stress conditions. ZBl Bakteriol Hygiene 1993;279:180-90. 13. Kjelleberg S (ed). Starvation in bacteria. Plenum Press, New York, 1993. 14. Raahave D. Wound contamination correlates with postsurgical infection rates: a new assessment technique. In: Wadström T et al (eds) Pathogenesis of wound and biomaterial-associated infections. Springer Verlag, London. 1990, p.525-32. 15. Laato M, Niinikoski J, Gerdin B. The effect of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and its products on wound healing. In: Wasdström T et al (eds) Pathogenesis of wound and biomaterial-associated infections. Springer Verlag, London 1990, p25-35. 16. Levenson SM, Kan.Gruber D, Gruber C, Molnar J, Seifter E. Wound healing accelerated by Staphylococcus aureus. Archives Surgery 1983;118:310-20. 17. Aasfjord P, Nyland H, Matre R. The mitogenic properties of lipoteichoic acid from Staphylococcus aureus. APMIS 1986;94:91-6. 18. Nichols RL. Preventing surgical site infections: A surgeon’s perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:220-4. 19. Larson E. Hygiene of the skin: When is clean too clean? Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:225-230. 20. Chambers HF. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:781-91. 21. Sieradzki K, Villari P, Tomasz A. Decreased susceptibilities to teicoplann and vancomycin among coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob Ag Chemother 1998;42:100-7. 22. Tenover FC, Biddle JW, Lancaster MV. Increasing resistance to vancomycin and other glycopeptides in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:327-31. 70.43.110.74 (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

your deletion of Cathal Magee

Hi Alexf!

I'm going to have to contest your deletion of Cathal Magee. He has landed the job as CEO of Ireland's largest employer, the Health Service Executive, and he has significant coverage in The Irish Times, as cited in the article. Would you reconsider the deletion? Regards, decltype (talk) 23:59, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Reconsidered. Maybe it's enough although I'm not totally convinced. -- Alexf^(talk) 01:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! decltype (talk) 10:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Article Farouq Abdul-Aziz

Respected Sir,

Hope this massage finds you well. I have received massage that my article Farouq_Abdul-Aziz has been deleted due to copyright infringement of http://bucaillelegacy.com/FarouqAbdulAziz.html) but sir the article on http://bucaillelegacy.com is also my own work. Moreover, I want to edit my article on Farouq_Abdul-Aziz but it says ' protected by administrators'

Kindly guide me what should i do to get the article back

Best Regards

Mblegacy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mblegacy (talk • contribs) 07:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

The article was copied verbatim from the said website, which does not have a compatible copyright license. In fact it says all content is copyrighted by the site. We treat copyright violations seriously. If you say you own the copyrights to this article, please read donating copyrighted materials. Even after passing the copyvio hurdle, the material may not be appropriate for Wikipedia if it is not notable or if it is original research. Please remember to sign your posts with four tildes. Thank you. -- Alexf^(talk) 16:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Sir Kindly let me re-edit the page so i will add certain things which will also solve the notable issue.

Thanks a lot for helping —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mblegacy (talk • contribs) 17:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

"Adding certain things", as you put it, will not solve the issue at hand. The article is a word-by-word copyright violation. It would have to be completely re-written to pass that hurdle. It could be userfied but it would have to be taken off-line immediately as we cannot break the law and keep copyrighted material. Until you understand the issue, by reading the link provided above, we cannot continue. Other pages that could be of help to you on this issue are indicated in the many warnings you have had in your Talk Page already. Please look at: Copyright violations, Copyright Policy, WP:CC-BY-SA, Wikipedia:Copyright assistance. As before, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes. Thank you.

Deletion of Farouq Abdul-Aziz

OK Sir. I had read it all. I will completely re-write the article. Kindly userfy the article.--adnan (talk) 06:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Juan Román Riquelme

Hi,

This article is not listed at WP:Pending changes/Queue. Would you mind removing pending changes and then requesting a protection for pending changes? --Izno (talk) 22:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

My mistake. Fixed. It is now *not* in pending changes, Thanks for the heads up. - Alexf^(talk) 22:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Cheers. --Izno (talk) 22:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Our friend with the charming username

Hello, Alexf. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

01:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Farouq Abdul-Aziz

Respected sir,

I will completely change the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farouq_Abdul-Aziz, in order to avoid copyright violations. Kindly tell me how i can i access the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farouq_Abdul-Aziz. Kindly guide me how can i edit the article as it is protected and can be edited only by administrators. Thanx--adnan (talk) 06:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorbact(R) page Deletion

Re-post

Alex, the website was for you to easily find the listed credible references. Your assumption of unreliability is incorrect. If you again visit the webpage, you will see all authors and references which I have included below, including the prestigious Journal of Wound Care (JWC):

Sorbact® JWC Ljung Å, Yanagisawa, Wadström T, Journal of Wound Care vol 5; no 4; April 2006.

Using the principle of hydrophobic interaction to bind and remove wound bacteria.

“A hydrophobic dressing is a non-allergic, non-toxic alternative for reducing the microbial load of open wounds without enhancing nosocomial spread, and can reduce the use of antibiotics. Hydrophobic microorganisms bind to the dressing, preferably in a humid environment, and removed with it. They multiply to quite a low extent when absorbed in the dressing, and may not produce extracellular toxins and enzymes. Mechanisms of resistance to hydrophobic interaction have not been described.”

Additional refferences supporting Sorbact and The Sorbact Method:

Åsa Ljungh, MD, PhD, and Torkel Wadström, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Microbiology, Dermatology and Infection, Lund University, Sölvegatan 23, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden References

1. Hjertén S, Wadström T. What types of bonds are responsible for the adhesion of bacteria and viruses to native and artificial surfaces? In: Wadström T et al (eds) Pathogenesis of wound and biomaterial-associated infections. Springer Verlag, London, 1990, p 245-53.

2. Ljungh Å, Hjertén S, Wadström T. High surface hydrophobicity of aggregating Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from human infections studied with the salt aggregation test, SAT. Infect Immun 1985;47:522-6.

3. Ljungh Å, Österlind M, Wadström T. Cell surface hydrophobicity of group D and viridans streptococci isolated from patients with septicaemia. ZBl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg 1986;A261:280-6.

4. Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (eds). Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. ASM, Washington DC, 1990.

5. Hazen KC, Hazen BW. Surface hydrophobic and hydrophilic protein alterations in Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;107:83-8.

6. Faris A, Wadström T, Freer JH. Hydrophobic adsorptive hemagglutinating properties of Escherichia coli possessing colonization factor antigens (CFA/I or CFA/II), type 1 pili, or other pili. Current Microbiol. 1981;5:67-72.

7. Ljungh Å, Wadström T. Fimbriation of Escherichia coli in urinary tract infections. Comparisons between bacteria in the urine and subcultured bacterial isolates. Current Microbiol 1983;8:263-8.

8. Wessels JGH. Hydrophobins: proteins that change the nature of a fungal surface. Adv Microb Physiol. 1997:38:1-45.

9. Wadström T, Ljungh Å. Pathogenesis of wound infections. In: Altmeyer P (ed) Wound healing and infections. Springer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1995.

10. Jonsson P, Wadström T. Cell surface hydrophobicity of Staphylococcus aureus measured by the salt aggregation test (SAT). Current Microbiol 1984;10:203-10.

11. Ljungh Å, Wadström T. Growth conditions influence expression of cell surface hydrophobicity of staphylococci and other wound infection pathoens. Microbiol Immunol 1995;39:753-7.

12. Liang OD, Ascencio F, Vazquez-Juarez R, Wadström T. Binding of collagen, fibronectin, lactoferrin, laminin, vitronectin and heparan sulfate to Staphylococcus aureus strain V8 at various growth phases and under nutrient stress conditions. ZBl Bakteriol Hygiene 1993;279:180-90.

13. Kjelleberg S (ed). Starvation in bacteria. Plenum Press, New York, 1993.

14. Raahave D. Wound contamination correlates with postsurgical infection rates: a new assessment technique. In: Wadström T et al (eds) Pathogenesis of wound and biomaterial-associated infections. Springer Verlag, London. 1990, p.525-32.

15. Laato M, Niinikoski J, Gerdin B. The effect of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and its products on wound healing. In: Wasdström T et al (eds) Pathogenesis of wound and biomaterial-associated infections. Springer Verlag, London 1990, p25-35.

16. Levenson SM, Kan.Gruber D, Gruber C, Molnar J, Seifter E. Wound healing accelerated by Staphylococcus aureus. Archives Surgery 1983;118:310-20.

17. Aasfjord P, Nyland H, Matre R. The mitogenic properties of lipoteichoic acid from Staphylococcus aureus. APMIS 1986;94:91-6.

18. Nichols RL. Preventing surgical site infections: A surgeon’s perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:220-4.

19. Larson E. Hygiene of the skin: When is clean too clean? Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:225-230.

20. Chambers HF. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:781-91.

21. Sieradzki K, Villari P, Tomasz A. Decreased susceptibilities to teicoplann and vancomycin among coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob Ag Chemother 1998;42:100-7.

22. Tenover FC, Biddle JW, Lancaster MV. Increasing resistance to vancomycin and other glycopeptides in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:327-31.

70.43.110.74 (talk) 17:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

My Apologies

I would have thought that the common definition of Moron per Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online was a constructive edit. 98.148.124.242 (talk) 21:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

The term is already explained int he article. It is deprecated, and the extra explanation is not needed. -- Alexf^(talk) 21:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Restoration?

Hello. Could you please restore the article Richard ysulat which you deleted to a page in my userspace? It would be really great. I was thinking about what language is the article in, but you deleted the article and I can't think about it anymore. Kubek15 ^write/sign 18:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

It was pure vandalism in some Philippine language (Filipino or Tagalog maybe). I did a rough translation in Google Trans and it was nothing worth keeping. What do you want it for? (I wonder) -- Alexf^(talk) 20:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Ah, OK. I just wondered in what language was it in, but you told it :) Kubek15 ^write/sign 11:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Sarah Katherine Trimble

Sarah Katherine Trimble is a current high school student who is very serious about becoming a future rapper. She has entered many local and national rap contests and faired incredibly well in all of them, so well in fact that she has been contacted by multiple agents who have attempted to sign her to minor contracts. Sarah Katherine strongly believes in education and therefore has turned down every offer to sign a contract because she wants to finish her education first. Although she still hopes and aspires to get signed to a record label one day and eventually have a world wide release of an album. The creation of a wikipedia page about her would greatly help her accomplish her dreams of getting signed onto a record label and so I am kindly asking you to allow this page to continue to exist. I am currently lacking links because most of the agents that have contacted her are unknown, and the rap competitions she has entered are not on the web she learned about them from friends and family members. It would be of great help if you could allow this page to remain on wikipedia. Thank you. (Aluke4 (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)) Aluke4

Unfortunately the article failed the notability requirements. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. Maybe you should consider an alternate site more suitable for this, like Facebook or your own blog or website. Good luck. -- Alexf^(talk) 01:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Contested CSD

Please see Talk:New Mexico State Road 448 for discussion. Article was wrongfully marked as copyvio, which I SWEAR that is not true. That site you posted appears to be a Wikipedia mirror. ANDROS¹³³⁷ 00:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Could be. I'm not denying it. I checked the text of the site and it matched the copyvio claim in the article in question. Therefore CSD approved. It could be a chicken and egg question. I see you have the text of the article in your linked page. If you re-write some and seriously document the article, then it should be no problem. -- Alexf^(talk) 01:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Just to nose in, I work in the copyright area and was following up on this and I just confirmed that the site is a Wikipedia mirror. See for example http://www.reachinformation.com/define/Debt.aspx which includes a broken wikt:owed hyperlink. I found no evidence of copying from any source. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Anyway, here is my rewrite: User:Andros 1337/New Mexico State Road 448. ANDROS¹³³⁷ 02:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Ah. Thanks Verno for the info. Looks god Andros. Sorry about the confusion. -- Alexf^(talk) 10:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

So, when can it be moved back into the main article namespace? ANDROS¹³³⁷ 15:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I moved the article to mainspace at New Mexico State Road 448. -- Alexf^(talk) 17:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

RocketRoute

RocketRoute.com is a valid business in the same way as Jeppessen - people will be interested to understand about the business, what it does and its history. Please add back the page.

Many thanks in advance Kurt Lyall —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurt Rocket (talk • contribs) 16:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh I don't doubt it may be a "valid business", whatever that means, but if you had read the notice placed in your Talk Page by the nominating editor, or the deletion summary afterwards, the issue had nothing to do with "validity" (an alien concept to Wikipedia), but with notability, especially failing the requirements under WP:ORG and WP:WEB. Please read the rules under those pages. You may also be interested in the Business FAQ and the conflict of interest pages, that may be of help to you. Have a good day. -- Alexf^(talk) 16:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Deleting redirect

Hi. I've noticed, that you deleted redirect SZD-C Żuraw II. This name is wrong indeed, but there were two articles and a template linking to it. I'll repair these links, but I just wanted to point your attention for the future. Regards. Pibwl ←« 17:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Thanks for the info. Cheers. -- Alexf^(talk) 17:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

Can you delete me whole profile? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacoby Hamilton (talk • contribs) 20:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Huh? what do you mean "me whole profile"? If you mean delete your account, no, we don't delete accounts. Other than that I don't understand your question. -- Alexf^(talk) 21:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Diegodiego

Since this article has been repeatedly recreated and CSD'd 5 times, could you WP:SALT it so we don't have to go through this ad nauseum? Thanks, GregJackP Boomer! 23:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I had already salted it but for three months. Maybe I should've done longer but as a rule I don't salt indefinitely (you never now). If it happens again it might be a good candidate for it. -- Alexf^(talk) 00:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Should have figured that - thanks. :D GregJackP Boomer! 00:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Vishay Precision Group

Vishay Precision Group I understand how I infringed on Wikipedia's policies. I believe that a few deletions can quickly resolve the problem. May I be allowed to edit it to your policies or can you delete the portions that made you delete it? I believe there was a list of specifications that would be considered advertising. But the rest of the summary of the company should be unbiased and straightforward.

Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank you for the understanding. Zuri125 (talk) 12:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

The article was duly deleted as advertising as indeed it was. Even if you modified it to sound less like an ad, it still would fail the notability requirements for companies, as it had no reliable sources and especially because you indeed say the company "was launched on June 1, 2010", hardly time to become notable. Please read the business FAQ as it might be of help to you. -- Alexf^(talk) 13:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Alex,

I see your point. However, although "Vishay Precision Group" was launched on June 1, it is splitting off from Vishay Intertechnology, a publically traded Fortune 1000 company founded in 1962. Precision Group is not a new company; the original company is just splitting off into two seperate components. Precision Group will soon also be publically traded (on NYSE) starting on July 6. The "Vishay" trademark has been around for almost 50 years, so I would argue that it is quite notable.

Let me make a comparison: if you go to the Qualcomm wiki page, the bottom of the corporate history lists Flarion Technologies, which is now simply a subsiduary of Qualcomm. How does this subsiduary have a "notable" wiki, while a publically traded company with roots from a company with 50 years of standing is not considered notable?

Please reconsider? Thanks, Zuri125 (talk) 07:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

And in response to independent references:

1. http://www.thestreet.com/story/10712507/1/vishay-precision-group-files-form-10-registration-statement.html - an article written by BusinessWire (a subsiduary of Berkshire Hathaway, which is Warren Buffett's company)

2.http://www.hoovers.com/company/Vishay_Precision_Group_Inc/rjrjsxi-1.html - wikipedia suggests a reference from hoovers, and here it is.

3. http://philadelphia.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2010/06/21/daily16.html?ana=yfcpc - Philadelpha Business Journal

4. http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2010/06/16/vishay-sets-spin-off-terms/?mod=yahoobarrons - blog on Barron's

5. http://seekingalpha.com/article/210513-vishay-provides-more-details-of-pending-spinoff?source=yahoo - Seeking Alpha

Zuri125 (talk) 07:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Userfied to User:Zuri125/Vishay Precision Group for you to work on. -- Alexf^(talk) 09:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Alex. I have made changes which I think are now acceptable. Let me know if there is still a problem. Thanks for your help Zuri125 (talk) 09:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

hello

i didn't remove a template someone added a player name to the current squad and the player wasn't trasnfered officialy so i removed his name —Preceding unsigned comment added by AhMeD BoSS (talk • contribs) 05:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Hollywood411newsmagazine

User is using their talk page to promote their magazine should this be reverted? Mo ainm~Talk 21:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Page protected. Thanks for the heads up. -- Alexf^(talk) 02:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

deletion of page on Kirti Tsenshab Rinpoche

Please note that I am the author of the article on kalachakranet.org which you assumed violated copyright as Wiki page on Kirti Tsenshab Rinpoche. Unfortunately, I do not have the time to login to Wikipeadia every day, so I could not respond earlier to the message on my page. I would just like to say that the deletion of the page was a bit of a silly action, because Rudyh01 is my username, and my real name is Rudy Harderwijk, you can find me on the list of names of the advisory team - as the last name and webmaster of the kalachakranet.org site; see http://kalachakranet.org/ikn_purpose.html , the second table from the top. I hope this clears up the assumed copyright issue as a mistake, and perhaps the page can be restored? Love & clear light, Rudy Harderwijk - alias rudyh01

Then you should read about donating copyrighted materials. Also please read about conflicts of interest, which you are freely admitting to. The article needs proper independent reliable sources and proper citations. Please be advised that we cannot accept original research. -- Alexf^(talk) 21:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

UOregonArts

User:UOregonArts seems to be a promotion-only account for: Cinema Pacific Film Festival at the University of Oregon. -WarthogDemon 01:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I see it has been taken care already. Thanks for the info, but remember the place to report usernames for faster service is at UAA. Cheers. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:27, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I wasn't sure because I think I've once or twice done that, and have been told to take it to AIV instead. And my accuracy with UAA isn't all that great. :P -WarthogDemon 17:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Oskarova Fobija

Dear Alex,

do you really think that Oskarova Fobija is not a significant synth-pop band? Maybe you didn't hear about them but who can hear about all bands ever existed? Did you research a little about the subject before its delition? Maybe I am not a right person to write an Wikipedia entry about the subject but I just cannot beleive that Wikipedia doesn't have a page about Oskarova Fobija and tried to help about it. I don't ask you to un-delite my article. I am just asking myself: "How can they still don't have an antry about this subject?"

Best Wishes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.46.216.151 (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

The article simply failed the notability requirements for musicians. Notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, popularity, or being "significant" as you put it. If you can write an article and cite verifiable reliable sources, then it might have a place. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:27, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my new entry about Marc Aryan.You wanted speedy deletion for the entry.I want to know how you decided my entry was related to me just looking at my nickname and an internationally known (as seen in references) artist is not notable just you dont know about him/her.I also want to know if you are a wikipedia administrator or a conributor!(who just delates other peoples contibutions). Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcaryan (talk • contribs) 13:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

Dude, why did you delete my article on the band The Wretched Few?!?!?! there was nothing on there that was spam racial or anything else your reasons have said. the band is actually real has a following and has a purpose so dude what the hell explain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.244.90 (talk) 01:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Because it failed the requirements under WP:BAND as the deletion summary explained. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Buchanko

The page Buchanko previously created by me was no way of a violation as it is.It holds current value as to state who is under certain nicknames.Wikipedia holds information,and i stated out the information necessary to exclude any possible misunderstandings.In addition,it does NOT only hold information regarding me,but the whole Buchanko family,moreover it was never meant to promote or a myspace page, >:( , and i provided no information relating to that, so what gives?! Please do reply... BUCHANKO (talk) 10:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The article was speedy deleted under A7 (Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). It did not have any sourcing and read like original research which is not acceptable. Also had a conflict of interest. I've no idea what you are talking about promotion or myspace as it was not deleted for that reason, even though a social network would not be an acceptable source. -- Alexf^(talk) 10:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Like what resources would be even possible here? How can you image any resources on the subject? Please do give an example... BUCHANKO (talk) 14:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Please read bout the rules for notability. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor a directory, so a term or word by itself won't easily do. You could try Wiktionary. -- Alexf^(talk) 22:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)