User talk:Alcuin MacAlcuin

August 2022

Hello, I'm Praxidicae. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Digital currency have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are reverting two edits 1) additional factual information about the legal framework for digital currency in a major jurisdiction, the EU, and 2) information about relevant commercial applications and services providers. The new edits are factual and referenced by links to official institutions and notable media. There is comparable information about digital currency law and applications already on the page. Please justify your assertion that they are "promotional". Alcuin MacAlcuin (talk) 16:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Alcuin MacAlcuin (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are reverting two edits 1) additional factual information about the legal framework for digital currency in a major jurisdiction, the EU, and 2) information about relevant commercial applications and services providers. The new edits are factual and referenced by links to official institutions and notable media. There is comparable information about digital currency law and applications already on the page. Please justify your assertion that they are "promotional". Alcuin MacAlcuin (talk) 16:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Digital currency shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:27, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]