User talk:AlabamaGuy2007

Welcome!

"The Austin Daily"

You must have gone to Decatur High. ;-) I went to Austin, and we always said just the opposite — that the Daily was biased towards Decatur High. That said, I'm not sure it's really appropriate to mention that in the Daily's article. I do admit it's possible that this has become a common view and saying since I graduated (in 1998); though as a lifelong reader of the Daily, I haven't noticed any change, and still see the opposite bias. I guess we see what we want to see. :-p —LonelyPilgrim 02:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, actually I still go to Decatur, but, hmm, I've never heard of the Decatur Daily being biased towards Decatur High. I guess it just seems that the paper is bias towards Austin cause it gave one paragraph to our marching band, and 6 to Austin's. (AlabamaGuy2007 09:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Well, that's because we're better. ;-p Are you a band person, too? Band bias was always something I was sensitive to, also. It seems like in athletics, the Daily favors whatever school is doing better in that particular year (which was almost always Decatur when I was in school), but band is so much more subjective. I remember one time being upset that the Decatur band got a full-page spread for its state contest superiors, without even any mention of ours. I was reading your Decatur High page today, and got a little indignant at first at the claim about the band having the state record for superiors. We were always told we had the state record. Then I read it more carefully, and checked my facts, and you're right. Decatur has the record for cumulative state superiors (54 total, I think), but Austin has the record for consecutive superiors (40 last year). And you're correct that Decatur has the record for consecutive district superiors. I was in band at Austin with Robbie Stout, BTW. And I actually worked at the Daily for a year, and can say with confidence that most of the apparent bias has more to do with who calls the reporters to be interviewed than with any prejudice on their part. They don't know things unless people tell them, and they don't go out of their way to interview people unless it's something really big. Most publicity has to be drummed up, and I guess the Austin band must just have a good publicist right now. BTW, I really appreciate all of the hard work you've put into articles about the North Alabama area. Keep up the good work. —LonelyPilgrim 05:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, yea I'm a band person, Stout's our band director, he's........interesting, to say the least. Yea, I shoulda put in the detail about the cumulative superior ratings, didn't think of that. Well, thank you for the compliment. AlabamaGuy2007 07:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Im a band member in Brewer High School's Band. I havent seen Decatur's band, but I have seen Austin, and they're really good (and huge!). They go to the Morgan County Night of Bands every year at Brewer.

Decatur-Courtland-Tuscumbia Railroad

Hi. Pontchartrain Rail-Road is also clearly west of the Appalachians, so I modified the claim. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 21:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Austin High School (Decatur, Alabama)

Hello, I noticed that you have helped with the Decatur High School (Alabama) article, would you mind helping me with the Austin High School (Decatur, Alabama) article as well? I'm trying to expand it to the best of my abilities, but you apparently have a homefield advantage. ;-) It has been nominated for deletion but I am confident that it will be kept since it is an International Baccalaureate school. Thanks, Silensor 19:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your earlier comments, would you happen to have reliable source that shows this school has a high ranking band program? I would like to incorporate that into the article as well. Silensor 20:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the link to this page, I'm hoping to find an additional secondary source as well, if one can be dredged up. Silensor 08:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Birmingham

Do you not think you might have discussed your recent move of Birmingham to Birmingham, England before going ahead? Most people in the world think of Birmingham in the UK when "Birmingham" is mentioned, not "Birmingham, Alabama". There is therefore no need to disambiguate it in the way you have. MarkThomas 15:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Texas in the South

Hi, I was just wondering what your opinion on Texas being part of the South is. There has been some debate about this; 86% of Texans consider themselves Southerners, and Texas was part of the Confederacy, but many non-Texans group Texas with the Southwest. If we can get the opinions of people from the Deep South about Texas, it would help. Thanks! --Stallions2010 19:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why you ask that. I believe you are asking because of the talk page on the Decatur page. I said that people in Alabama do not consider most (land area) of Texas as Southern. I mean by that, pretty much everything west of Austin, and Abilene. And everything north of Abilene. If there is anything else that I might have said that needs more clarification, please just say so. :~) I'd be happy to help. The opinions I have just expressed are pretty much what everyone else in the Decatur area thinks, so, that's what goes on the web pages.

Or, if that's not what you were talken about here's a an explanation. I don't know much about population distibution of Texas but, I'd say that what's west and north of those cities (Austin, and Abilene) is pretty much the remaining 12%. I do consider parts of Texas southern, I have family in FW. I consider San Antonio kinda western, but also kinda southern, it's hard to say. AlaGuy 04:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't referring to the talk on the Decatur page, but thanks for your help. Fort Worth is a great town...I'd say one of the most Southern in the state. Houston is very Southern indeed. As for Dallas...it's a bit Southern, but more of a modern city. You're right, most of the Texan population is concentrated in the areas Alabamians consider to be Southern. Thanks again for your opinion! --Stallions2010 22:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dont tell me what to do - horrorfiend138

SEC National Championships

Hi, I understand that Alabama and Arkansas shared the National Championship in 1964, but since Arkansas was not in the SEC at that time, shouldn't they be removed from this list? It's a list of championships won by the SEC and this is a championship won by the SWC.76.18.100.128 02:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saxophone

Hey, I was just wondering what kind of saxophone you play. Myself, I'm best at the baritone.

Kevin ^(TALK) 01:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

proposed deletion

Go to town. You created the article. I just fixed a redirect. --Dystopos 03:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In fact. Since it's such a no-brainer, I'll go ahead and merge and redirect. Deletion is unnecessary. --Dystopos 03:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing vandalism

FYI, you should probably use Undo when you revert vandalism. When you manually reverted here, you lost three entire sections that had been wiped out with this vandalism. They were gone until I happened to do a large diff four days later and noticed the missing sections. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New NRHP Collaboration Division

Hey, saw you were a participant in the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject. I thought I would let you know that there is a new Collaboration Division up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to Good article standard or higher. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the division subpage. IvoShandor 10:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alabama

I see you signed up for the Alabama project. I'd like to go ahead and move it from proposal to project this week. Do you have any thoughts or comments? JBEvans 11:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf Coast article

Hi, I noticed you went to some trouble to update the county populations along the Gulf in the Gulf Coast of the United States article, and removed the update template. But 1) you didn't provide any citation or reference; 2) you didn't update the metropolitan area populations, and they still need updating; and 3) someone removed the entire section on the counties in an edit on 27 April 2007. The article appears to be targeted for a lot of vandalism, and I can't determine if the removal of the section on counties was vandalism, because the person who removed it neither cited a reason in his edit summary nor made a note on the Talk page. Perhaps you would care to restore the data you had contributed? Thanks. Laura1822 02:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Alabama

Hi AlabamaGuy2007! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your excellent edits on Alabama related articles. We need your help at the Alabama WikiProject! This is a new WikiProject and there is much work to do. Please head over to the project page, add your name, and help us enhance and increase the coverage of Alabama related stories.
JodyB_{yak, yak, yak} 14:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan City's Page...

I edited it, I live in Morgan City/Lacey's Spring, so I put what I thought it needed in there.

Just making sure...

Making sure that you are aware of the WP:ALSH standards. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me which article or part of an article this would be related to specifically. There is alot of info in the standards' article so, it's pretty hard to tell where I'm going wrong.AlaGuy (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alabama

Just letting you know that I left my two cents under your comment at Template_talk:Alabama#Regions. Also, do you know what kind of problems with the template that User:Wikid77 is talking about on the talk page? Altairisfar^talk 04:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DECMET.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DECMET.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 01:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:DHMA.gif

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:DHMA.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:DHMA.gif is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:DHMA.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now Commons

Alabama-map2.jpg, an image uploaded from this account in December 2005, is now available as Commons:File:Downtown Decatur Alabama.jpg.

Similarly, Saxes-4.jpg is now Commons:File:Old State Bank building Decatur.jpg.

— Athaenara ✉ 05:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:DCTMAP.gif

File:DCTMAP.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Tuscumbia-Courtland-Decatur Railroad.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Tuscumbia-Courtland-Decatur Railroad.gif]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DecHuntMet2.gif is now available as Commons:File:Huntsville-Decatur Metro area.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlaUrbRevised.GIF is now available as Commons:File:Alabama urban areas.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:P3220133.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Geneva, Alabama live oak.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:P4150152.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Port of Decatur.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:P4150151.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Port of Decatur silo.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:53, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuntLakeSHADE.gif is now available as Commons:File:Lake Guntersville.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WheelLAKECHADE.gif is now available as Commons:File:Wheeler Lake.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WheelShade.gif is now available as Commons:File:Wheeler Wildlife Refuge map.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DecShade.gif is now available as Commons:File:Decatur Alabama map.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheShoalsSHADE.gif is now available as Commons:File:Florence-Muscle Shoals Metro area map.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CWCB.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Civil War reenactment Decatur.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:DecIndian.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DecIndian.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Campus Ambassadors wanted in Troy, Alabama

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you're listed as a Wikipedian in Alabama. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at Troy University, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

I know Alabama is a big state, but if you happen to live near Troy and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from Troy who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 15:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Oldbank3.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oldbank3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AlabamaGuy2007. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Decatur Parks and Recreation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Decatur Parks and Recreation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decatur Parks and Recreation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JUDAS MAIDEN (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AlabamaGuy2007. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ogle Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ogle Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogle Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bneu2013 (talk) 09:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:North Alabama Landmarks

Template:North Alabama Landmarks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bneu2013 (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Huntsville-Decatur Metropolitan Area

Template:Huntsville-Decatur Metropolitan Area has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Good AL Map.gif

The file File:Good AL Map.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DecHuntMet.gif

The file File:DecHuntMet.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unclear use/purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DecShadeNew2.jpg

The file File:DecShadeNew2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]