User talk:Akinadewojo

Welcome!

Hi Akinadewojo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! SovalValtos (talk) 22:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 16:34, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also have concerns that you are using ChatGPT or some other LLM when contributing, though so far, you only seem to have used it at the Teahouse. You should be extremely careful about simply pasting the output from such software into Wikipedia. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop answering questions at the Teahouse. Again you have given a partially incorrect and potentially AI-generated response. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 22:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xeverything11 (talk) 12:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, @Akinadewojo, I'm afraid you're going to have to explain this edit. Please, no more editing until you come in here and do so. Valereee (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And this one, which is a mixture of reasonable (though arguably incorrect, as dates for other countries aren't rendered in American format) edits and bizarre ones. Valereee (talk) 12:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And this. You changed "due to reduction" to "due ta o reduction". This looks like a lack of English fluency. Valereee (talk) 12:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Valereee (talk) 12:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry about this. My computer system must have frozen while I was typing that, it was not due to a lack of English fluency. Akinadewojo (talk) 13:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Lack of competence to edit.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Valereee (talk) 12:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am an avid lover of knowledge, and I love to share knowledge and accurate information with others. As a librarian who is currently a doctoral student, I am really charged up to edit; it is something I have fallen in love with, and it is a thing of joy to me if I can continue doing that. I am looking forward to learning, and I promise to properly and carefully edit going forward. I will be glad if my request to be unblocked is carefully granted. Akinadewojo (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I have realized the error, I seek to make amends. Akinadewojo (talk) 13:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akinadewojo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am an avid lover of knowledge, and I love to share knowledge and accurate information with others. As a librarian who is currently a doctoral student, I am really charged up to edit; it is something I have fallen in love with, and it is a thing of joy to me if I can continue doing that. I am looking forward to learning, and I promise to properly and carefully edit going forward. I will be glad if my request to be unblocked is carefully granted, While I have realized the error, I seek to make amends. Akinadewojo (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me your future edits would be significantly different from your prior edits. Yamla (talk) 13:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I deeply understand your concern. I will do better next time. I understand I was blocked so as to prevent such from reoccurring.

It appears that English is not your primary language, may I recommend you try contributing to the Wikipedia of a language you are more fluent in? --Jayron 32 16:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC) I just saw a message I was mentioned, stating my unblock request was AI generated, this is absolutely not true. in the same section, it was stated my bio does not align with the same command of English language written in my unblock request, if there were other ways to prove my innocence I would not hesitate to do so. I only took a cue from the guidelines in appealing a block which I believe should not be an issue.[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at User talk:Akinadewojo, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. -Lemonaka‎ 11:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akinadewojo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to appeal for my ban to be reviewed, during the period of my ban, I have taken my time to read and learn more about editing on Wikipedia to avoid and minimise errors and vandalism on Wikipedia, I would be glad if my ban is favourably lifted. Akinadewojo (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

These general statements are nice but tell us nothing to demonstrate your understanding of what was wrong with your edits or tell us what specifically you will do differently. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I get the sense that English may not be your primary language, if so, you may find it much easier to contribute to the Wikipedia of your primary language. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not better than others. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC) I will take note of that. I speak two languages, English is my official language. ( Akinadewojo (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC) )[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akinadewojo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my previous edits were not constructive, and some of my edits were also disruptive as an example was cited where the pattern of dates I edited varies from different countries. Going forward, I will make sure my edits are constructive to avoid potential problematic edits, I will also make sure I am not in any way vandalising while making edits, as had been suggested earlier. I will refrain from making contributions on topics that I do not have a command of. I know why I was blocked, and I will make sure I do not repeat those errors in the future. Akinadewojo (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been repeatedly asked for specifics of what the problems were with your edits, and what you will do differently. You still have not provided those, so clearly you are either unable to understand such instructions or unwilling to follow them (and date formatting was not the issue). I will be revoking access to your talk page; further appeals may be made via the Unblock Ticket Request System. Before doing so, I strongly advise that you carefully read and ensure you understand everything that was said to you above. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #74916

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still, no specifics. Just copied what they were told in block log and so forth. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]