Jump to content

User talk:Ajijul Islam emon104

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:11, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

[edit]

Hello, I'm Mojo Hand. I noticed that in this edit to Sir Salimullah Medical College, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

salimullah medical college is not second largest medical college. Health ministry declared Chittagong medical college as second largest medical college. So, it was false information.
Here is the proof
https://app.dghs.gov.bd/localhealthbulletin2014/publish/publish.php?org=10000756&year=2014 Ajijul Islam emon104 (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit provides an explanation and a source, so I would consider it appropriate. However, please keep in mind that if your edit is reverted more than once, the Wikipedia community expectation is to address the issue on the article talk page rather than to keep pushing your change. Even if you believe you are correct, it is considered edit warring to continue to revert other people. Reverting more than 3 times in a 24 hour period is the bright line violation that usually results in blocking an editor from Wikipedia.
Let me know if you have any questions.--Mojo Hand (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why this information is reverted again? Ajijul Islam emon104 (talk) 02:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you and another editor disagree about the reliability of sources. As I said above, the proper place to have the argument is on the article talk page rather than continuing to edit war.--Mojo Hand (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He should give a official notice as I give. He is showing a article of newspaper. I didn't make him understand that Wikipedia is the most trusted source. So, avoiding information that is not gov't. recognised shouldn't be added. You should make him understand that point. Ajijul Islam emon104 (talk) 14:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I gave an edit warring notice.--Mojo Hand (talk) 14:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bandarban District
added a link pointing to Bengali
Chittagong Hill Tracts
added a link pointing to Bengali
Khagrachhari District
added a link pointing to Bengali
Rangamati Hill District
added a link pointing to Bengali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Abul Hasan (poet)
added a link pointing to Gopalganj
Humayun Ahmed
added a link pointing to HSC
Humayun Azad
added a link pointing to HSC
Muhammed Zafar Iqbal
added a link pointing to HSC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bandarban District
added a link pointing to Others
Rangamati Hill District
added a link pointing to Others

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chittagong Hill Tracts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Christianity in Bangladesh
added links pointing to Dinajpur District, Kaliganj Upazila, Nawabganj Upazila, Durgapur Upazila and Pirganj Upazila

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hinduism in Bangladesh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dinajpur District and Pirganj Upazila.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citing web sources

[edit]

Thank you for your interest in improving Bangladesh-related articles.

To cite a reference available on the internet, give the URL of the specific web page where the referenced content can be found. In Bandarban District, the URL https://bbs.portal.gov.bd/site/page/b432a7e5-8b4d-4dac-a76c-a9be4e85828c fails verification for all statements about ethnic groups because that page says nothing about ethnicity. Perhaps you have mistakenly given a shallow URL, a high level page from which one could click one or more links to eventually arrive at a web page that supports the content. If that is the case, the solution is for you to cite the deeper URL where the information actually appears.

If the deeper link is to a long pdf document, you should also specify what page or pages support the statement you're making. Page numbers are especially important if you are deriving information by performing mathematical operations on what is in the original source. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should open the link and search chakma, Marma individualy. Then you will find their population and make percentage from total population. Bengali percentage is taken from second URL. Ajijul Islam emon104 (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is not the reader's responsibility to hunt through the website for the right link. The burden is on you as the editor who wants to include the information to provide the correct URL for it. If you don't, anyone can remove the content. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of "census"

[edit]

Hi Ajijul Islam emon104! I wanted to kindly bring to your attention that I have noticed the spelling of "census" has been written as "cencus" in several of your recent edits. I appreciate your contributions and just wanted to ensure the correct spelling is used in the future. Thanks again! Wikipedialuva (talk) 07:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to ঢাকা কলেজের প্রাক্তন শিক্ষার্থী. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it has too many problems of language or grammar and the whole article needs to be translated. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Sir Salimullah Medical College. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajijul Islam emon104 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The information which was I had removed, was a false information. There is no ranking in Bangladeshi medical colleges. Provided citation wasnot about ranking. I request to review it. I try to provide information with 100% authenticity. I hope Wikipedia will review the information which I had removed. I pray for unblocking me as well as removing this misinformation

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block.

Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:

Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.
Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.
Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.

To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what it all means. Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ajijul Islam emon104 (talk) 07:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, প্রণব কুমার চৌধুরী. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – en:Pranab Kumar Chowdhury. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at en:Pranab Kumar Chowdhury. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:en:Pranab Kumar Chowdhury|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MCE89 (talk) 12:04, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]