Jump to content

User talk:Aervanath/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10←Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16→Archive 20

Debresser

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Request_to_revoke_sanction. --B (talk) 23:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I have posted there.--Aervanath (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Highly active users

Hi. How do I add myself into the list of highly active user? I'm on here everyday except for Sundays. BejinhanTalk 07:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Looks like you figured it out already. :) --Aervanath (talk) 16:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

The de-orphaning script

Remember that de-orphaning script? It's finally out. Check out User:Manishearth/OrphanTabs for details. ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 08:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Really?

I saw your note on my talkpage. I would like to contest your right to impose such a restriction. And I may add from the start, that if you are within your right, such a sanction will be sufficient reason for me to leave Wikipedia. Debresser (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

May rationale is simple: if you (or for that matter any other administrator of Wikipdia) is willing to impose a sanction on me, without any regard to the background of my actions (as you have stated clearly that you do not care), then such an injustice goes against my priciples. In view of the nature of this conflict, as described in the editwar report, I can not but see your sanction as an injustice. Debresser (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Debresser_reported_by_User:William_Allen_Simpson_.28Result:_editing_sanction_for_both_reporter_and_reportee.29 for a specific explanation of why I consider this sanction an injustice. Debresser (talk) 18:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

That discussion was closed with the note that the place for appeal is wp:ani. I have been offline a week, because I moved. I posted my appeal on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_to_revoke_sanction. Debresser (talk) 18:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

I have commented there.--Aervanath (talk) 20:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
BTW, I noticed I address you as female, but others address you as male. What do you prefer? Debresser (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
I am male, although on-wiki, who really cares? :) --Aervanath (talk) 22:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
I'll change my post accordingly. Interesting, I should have erred so. Debresser (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Honestly, I didn't even notice. :) I was more concerned with trying to find a fair way to deal with this situation. By the way, in the future, you can check if somebody has the gender set in their preferences by using {{gender}}. Cheers, --Aervanath (talk) 04:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. And how can I set my gender? Debresser (talk) 06:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
It's in Special:Preferences, under "User profile".--Aervanath (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Debresser (talk) 09:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

You gotta help me here! Please!

The entire paperwork is so confusing, and I wonder if you can help me on the paperwork please. I'm requesting for Otterathome to be banned becuase he violated a couple of the Wikipedia guidelines such as:

  • Involved in several edit wars.
  • Constantly gaming the system.
  • Betraying a couple of people.
  • Redirected his userpage to Autofellatio.
  • Stereotyped Uncyclopedians in a derogatory manner (from my view, I think).
  • In his user talkpage, the links are obscured, and he ignored the consensus.

Here are his contributions. This guy must be stopped. Please. Joe9320 of the CUWP | Contact the Council 00:10, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Ummm, there is no paperwork. Post to WP:ANI.--Aervanath (talk) 05:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

The WBCN radio information

Dear Aervanath: 

   It has just been pointed out to me by some former DJs who worked at WBCN radio that their names and the names of several others have been deleted by the last people who “edited” the page. There is a very accurate list being compiled now by Lisa Traxler, who was one of the BCN employees along with me. I am hesitant to write, say or touch the WBCN Wikipedia page because of the trouble I had a year ago, when I made some of my own edits and you rescued me after months of hassle and confusion..

I could have Lisa contact you by email or on this post if you'd like, but she is a very reliable and accurate source- any of her suggested changes can be substantiated in several ways, depending on the criteria demanded by your people at W. Here's my email address: charles@radiowaveX.com Here's Lisa Traxler's email address: lisatraxler@yahoo.com

I await your suggestions as to how to correct the Wikopedia re-writing of history by the whoever the last contributors were. My phone is 808 268-1525 Regards, Charles Laquidara Laquidara (talk) 22:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Laquidara (talk) 22:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Please send me deleted article of Cush Aaron Solberg

The article got deleted and i'd like a copy of it please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laser358 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 00:55, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

20 August 2009 - Yarlung Zangbo Canyon move

Hello. I see that you handled a move of Yarlung Zangbo Grand Canyon to Yarlung Tsangpo Canyon back in May, so I assume you're an appropriate person to contact. Well, there have been two moves of the article since, and now the article is entitled Yarlung Zangbo Grand Canyo. Yes, "Canyo" without the "n". I understand that there's been some discussion over the transliteration of the Tibetan name, but I'd hope that a spelling error in the word "canyon" would be worthy of correction.

It also appears that 虞海 has gone around and changed both the articles on the river and the canyon to Yarlung Zangbo after you had changed it all to Yarlung Tsangpo. 72.92.143.228 (talk) 07:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

On RFA

Hi, Aervanath.

Following my previous RFA, you asked me to contact you before my next RFA. Since you expressed an intention to support or even co-nominate, I'm not sure if I'm actually allowed to do that under WP:CANVASS; but I'm not immediately jumping into that particular breach in any case, hence I feel able to speak to you.  :)

The situation is that Stifle has suggested I might stand again, and I have received email contact from another user recommending that I stand. I think I will do so in a month or so. (I'd like for my good article nomination to go through first in an attempt to hold David Fuchs, et. al., at bay.)

I'd be grateful for your honest opinion: do you think sufficient time will have passed by September or October?—S Marshall Talk/Cont 10:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Jut to let you know...

...that this was one of the most absurdly ignorantly closed FFD discussions I have ever seen. If you have such a poor understanding of our non-free content policy and of our overall mission, please consider declining our admin status (and maybe even avoiding any non-trivial edition). --Damiens.rf 19:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Orphanage

Hi Aervanath. I'm curious as to why you decided to become less active in de-orphaning articles? I've recently began to take up this task, I find it quite fun actually. Depending on your reasons for moving away from this area of maintenance, maybe I can get some insight from you as to what I can expect. Regards, Ϫ 21:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera Browser

You deleted "Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera Browser" with the edit summery "Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera Browser", but wouldn't it be better to just mark the page as historical? I don't know that much about deleting miscellaneous pages, or marking things as historical, so I apologize if this is a newbie question.--Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 22:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 14:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Email

Hi there. I just sent you an email. Amsaim (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

RFC: Removal of exceptions to "use common names" passage.

This is to inform you that the removal of exceptions to the use of Common Names as the titles of Wikipedia articles from the the Talk:Naming_Conventions policy page, is the subject of a referral for Comment (RfC). This follows recent changes by some editors.

You are being informed as an editor previously involved in discussion of these issues relevant to that policy page. You are invited to comment at this location. Xandar 22:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Napoleon and Tabitha D'umo

Six months ago I argued that this article be moved to Napoleon D'umo since his wife Tabitha had her own page and since they have different histories prior to meeting each other. I have since changed my mind: last month Altenmann placed a redirect/link in the marriage section on Tabitha's page to the marriage section on Napoleon's page. In the edit summary he/she typed "to avoid divergence of content". This made me start to feel differently.

The marriage section, the lead, and almost all of the career section on both pages are identical. They only section that's vastly different is early life. I want to recreate Napoleon and Tabitha D'umo and decrease their individual pages to stubs. The stubs would only have the early life section and the new article would have everything related to their career. I was planning to go ahead with the process but I thought I would check with you first because I noticed that when you moved the page back in April, you also moved the history. I didn't want to mess up protocol (if there is any) since you moved the history so I thought I would ask you first before I got started. // Gbern3 (talk) 19:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I just noticed your contribution history stops August 11. I'll ask another admin for a quicker response. // Gbern3 (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

Malta–Moldova relations

It seems that action was never taken on the consensus from the "Merge and delete" discussion at the Bilateral relations task force page, at least with regards to the redirect at Malta–Moldova relations. Is there any particular reason that action was not taken, or is it just something that no one got around to? If there's a reason for it being there, that's fine - I'd just like to know so that the modified RfD tag can be removed. Thanks! —Zach425 talk/contribs 08:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

Greetings, possible RfC

Xeeron and I have a history. He posted, what I deem an attack on me on the Administrators' Incidents Talkpage, and I want to do RfC. Since you have had experience with the heated nature of the 2008 South Ossetia War article before, can you take a look at this and recommend someone for RfC, or do it yourself?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:HistoricWarrior007_and_User:Xeeron

Thank You! HistoricWarrior007 (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

At WP:EL we are continuing to discuss the usage of official websites on web.archive.org here: Wikipedia_talk:External_links#ELs_of_official_websites_archived_on_web.archive.org WhisperToMe (talk) 20:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009


Happy Aervanath's Day!

User:Aervanath has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Aervanath's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Aervanath!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

How are you?

I hardly see you around these days. Busy? Debresser (talk) 13:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice

A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 2. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. Manning (talk) 08:18, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
You received this message because you participated in the earlier ArbCom secret ballot RFC.

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

Carolyn Joyce Carty

You appear to be the admin that withdrew the RFD for Carolyn Joyce Carty, on OTRS grouunds. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_January_25 (I'm assuming you also deleted the article on those grounds.) Anyway, there is "new" article on [[Carolyn Joyce Carty]. Have those OTRS concerns been resolved, or otherwise addressed, for that article to re-appear? jonathon (talk) 23:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

I was just about to message you myself about this page, Aervanath. It's awful, full of false info and baloney references. i was directed to you by John Z if you look at my talk page you can see the message i received from him regarding the article. Vinithehat (talk) 04:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I have attempted to refer the article to the meta:OTRS team, since I don't have OTRS access. Hopefully one of the volunteers there can see if the current article also violates the concerns raised in that ticket.--Aervanath (talk) 16:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!Vinithehat (talk) 18:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the status report. jonathon (talk) 04:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

AfD nomination of 2009 Honduran coup d'état

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 2009 Honduran coup d'état. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Honduran coup d'état. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:00, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

Help find my article

Hi

I have been trying for a very long time to add on article on to wikipedia. I have followed the copyright guidelines. I have also spent a long time formatting it. I used the article wizard to help me. Once i save changes, I close it.

But I cannot seem to find the article anymore. It does not appear when i search for it. Please help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.14.139.99 (talk) 08:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, what was the article called? Do you have an account? If you aren't logged in with a username, then that's your problem: you must log in to create articles. Go to Wikipedia:Account to see how to get a username (it's not difficult). If you have a username, please log in with it and leave a message here with your username so I can investigate further. Thanks!--Aervanath (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

SPI streamlining

Hello. The SPI team recently removed several of the more inactive clerks, to make way for people who have expressed interest in becoming active with the process. As some people who were removed have expressed no interest or wish to return to clerking, access to the bot functions have also been revoked. Of course, if you wish to remain a clerk, just readd your name to the list; but we do ask that you remain minimally active with the process. Thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

Please move deleted version of Wapsi Square into User Space for content recovery

Based on comments from User:Lee_M on the Wapsi Square talk page, I believe there was substantial material on the previous incarnation of the page that the current page (which recently survived a second proposal for deletion) would benefit from. Can you please shift the previous, deleted version of Wapsi Square into my user space so I can recover worthwhile material from it? Thanks. Netmouse (talk) 15:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

 Done Deleted version restored to User:Netmouse/Wapsi Square. Cheers, --Aervanath (talk) 15:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

Nomination for deletion of Template:Suicide response

Template:Suicide response has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Khukri 19:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

Have a question

Hello. I wanted to ask if it would be possible to merge histories of two articles. well someone copyed and pasted Disney XD onto Disney XD (United States), when they moved Disney XD -> Disney XD (United States). So this left the talk page and also the page history that should have been on Disney XD (United States) still on Disney XD page. So, could that be fixed? Gman124 talk 19:04, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it and let you know.--Aervanath (talk) 19:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
never mind. being fixed by someone. Gman124 talk 19:20, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
No sweat. :)--Aervanath (talk) 19:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I read top of your page says semi-retired (so though you weren;t on much). Thanks for replying. and sorry about not waiting for your reply. Gman124 talk 19:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
You caught me at just the right time; usually it'll take me a couple days before I see a message. Cheers, --Aervanath (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

Latin American Australian

Hi Aervanath,

On 15 June 2009 you moved Latin Australian to Latin American Australian. This followed a contentous and tiring debate between a single interest editor User:LatinoAussie (since banned) who wanted either "Latino Australian" or "Latin Australian", and others who wanted to use consistent and commonly used terminology.

On 20 January 2010 User:Plzppl moved Latin American Australian to Latin Australian over redirect, saying "the term Latin American Australian does not exist, Latino Australian is much more appropriate". Plzppl either ignored or was ignorant of the fraught and obvious debate on the talk page. He certainly did not take the right approach required for controversial moves.

I have a strong suspicion that Plzppl is one of the many (seven so far identified) sockpuppets of LatinoAussie (see Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Cazique). Plzppl, like LatinoAussie appears to only edit hip hop articles, as well as the Latino Australian page.

Could you please allow the move of Latin Australian to Latin American Australian please?

Thanks,

Kransky (talk) 08:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks like it's already in the capable hands of User:Jafeluv.--Aervanath (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

Debresser

Hello,

I wondered if you could look at these, and see if you feel you can counter sign either (or both) of them?

Newman Luke (talk) 03:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I'm not really sure my involvement would be helpful here. I've been semi-retired for a while, and I don't currently have the time to give a dispute like this the attention it deserves. Also, I tend to be somewhat blunt and heavy-handed when I do get involved, which has not always proved productive in the past. In scanning the two pages, I couldn't see anything which was particularly relevant to me, personally. If there is something I missed, please let me know. Thanks, --Aervanath (talk) 17:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
I've tried making it clearer with direct quotes - Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Debresser. Newman Luke (talk) 21:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

RfD nomination of Template:Geo-orphan

I have nominated Template:Geo-orphan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 16:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

Geber

Many thanks for making the page move for Geber to Jābir ibn Hayyān. I've converted Geber to a disambiguation page and I've also changed some of the links that pointed to that page to point directly to the new page if appropriate.

All the best. –Syncategoremata (talk) 23:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for cleaning that up! --Aervanath (talk) 00:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aervanath/Archive_14&oldid=1166522453"