User talk:Adrian Glamorgan
|
Parkerville and Steiner
[edit]welcome to the hell-hole known as wikipedia adrian - you should put something on your user page. Wiki format police will descend on your steiner article with a vengeance - take care! It would be worth looking carefully at the pages about what a wiki article should look like! SatuSuro 15:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, in the meanwhile, I'm adding clean-up tags. Please look at WP:MOS when you have a moment. -- AirOdyssey (Talk) 15:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Adrian - have you any idea how to use talk? SatuSuro 15:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please respond at some point! SatuSuro 15:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Help is on its way
[edit]With the steiner article, and with using wikipedia I suspect. As for me you never brought any organic produce from me, savvy? (as in pirates of carribean usage)
- Ok so you managed to type something in my talk page - next - you need to sign with four tildes and that will leave your user name and the date. Some people have quirks with talk - they'll only
leave talk on their page, not yours - so you have to use 'watchlist' very carefully for that.
- Steiner article. Adverts are deleted immediately on wikipedia - so look at the order I re-made your article. You need to expand it to justify having the headings though.
- Nyoongar ownership - sure - but in a Mundaring locality article? No way - look at nyoongar - if no links or citations this could be seen as POV another vip acronym youll need to learn
- DAB if you dont know this abnbrev'n - look at your article - you put an unqualified word (Perth for instance is no good) and look at where it takes you to!
- Email me (on the left hand side of my talk page) - and we can have an off wikipedia discission about the issue - or even phone conversation if you would like
Never give up - even if people ruthlessly edit your work, or even delete a page - there are good people inside - you just have to find them! :) SatuSuro 02:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Signing
[edit]Adrian - you'll need to look at the box above this - right hand side Getting along - and look at Sign your posts - it is important. SatuSuro 07:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- I've noticed you've already enjoyed some vandalism on the parky article - there is definitely an issue about the nyungar comment - it is one of about one hundred and twenty articles that could have exactly the same comment,
it needs to be removed - or the issue can be re-written and placed in a link to the main noongar article - if I dont do it someone else will! If you havent checked out POV or DAB yet- its worth checking it out! as this is not like working on a Nova article - this is wikipedia-... :) SatuSuro 07:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I thought it signed automatically. I've gone through the materials - I do remember mention of this! I haven't seen the vandalism. Hmm, 'twould be strange to not mentionNoongar people, or why they aren't around much Park these days! I thought the Sally Morgan touch was useful, given our discussion.
I haven't worked out how to email you! Adrian Glamorgan Hey this is good - this might be 5 tildes - if you do 4 it leaves the day and time as well - from memory you have a mac - go into view and enlarge your type so you can see them clearer! SatuSuro 10:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Look in the left column - top is navigation - then search and below that toolbox and there should be, god allowing - e-mail this user - try it ! SatuSuro 08:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Signing is on talk pages only! History of the article you are working on will have your name anyway SatuSuro 08:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Back at it again
[edit]Thought you'd moved on from them some time ago? Take care - if some of the more enthusiastic editors come across it - dont expect solitary peaceful untouched work - its open to anyone to edit or vandalise! SatuSuro 15:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Middle Schools
[edit]I have started a discussion on your updates to the Middle Schools pages. You might want to pop by and put your point across at Talk:Middle_school. Tafkam 10:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Penington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isaac Penington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corder catchpool, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internationalist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Corder catchpool
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Corder catchpool, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KylieTastic (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- If you're trying to use it as a template I'd probably recommend creating a page in your userspace at User:Adrian Glamorgan/Corder Catchpool. This is commonly referred to as userfying the information and can also be referred to as a draft copy. Once you've finished the article you can move the article to the mainspace at Corder Catchpool. I do have to warn you though, you will need to source the article fairly well. I noticed that your article for Mary Penington lacks a lot of coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS). The Quakers in the World website would likely be considered to be a self-published source for the most part since there's no real way we can verify its editorial oversight, bias, and so on. A better example of sourcing would be something like this book, which is published through the University of California Press, which has pretty rigorous editorial oversight. (This book would also be considered a good RS.) Something to take into account is that not all persons involved in a religious society are notable outside of said society. At a brief glance Penington looks to be notable based on how quickly I found two academic sources, but I'm having somewhat more difficulty with Catchpool. This doesn't mean that sources aren't out there (here's one), but it would be a good idea to build the article in your userspace first. I'd like to say that everyone coming in to any given article will help find sources and flesh it out, but not everyone does that and I always tell people to assume that your hands will be the first and last to actually improve the article or ensure that it meets the applicable guidelines (style, tone, sourcing, etc and so it goes). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Basically this is sort of a head's up since you haven't really edited a whole lot since the early days of Wikipedia and a lot has changed since then as far as proving notability and so on. I'd recommend getting a brief refresher of stuff. You have the basic stuff down, but going over notability guidelines and sourcing guidelines would be a good idea. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Adrian Glamorgan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Corder Catchpool has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Adrian Glamorgan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen F. Hayes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Adrian Glamorgan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Adrian Glamorgan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tokaimura nuclear accident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fukushima. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)