User talk:Adope266

This is Adope266's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baton Zabërgja has been accepted

Baton Zabërgja, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ortizesp (talk) 07:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Redon Ismaili

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Adope266 (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redon Ismaili, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

January 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Acroterion (talk) 03:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adope266 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, I don't know the reason why I'm blocked because I'm new and I'm getting experience in this direction to help and respect the rules of wikipedia, please unblock me and I'll try to be more careful in the next articles from now on Adope266 (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for sock puppetry, but do not discuss that in this request. If you have used other accounts, you need to say so now. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adope266 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry I wasn't very careful because I'm very new to wikipedia and every day I'm trying to recover myself to learn not to make mistakes, I never used any other account to create this article. Please if you see fit to unblock me, I would be very happy to continue creating and editing Wikipedia. :Thank you and sorry for the trouble.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry, unambiguous. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adope266 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been a few months that I don't use my old Adope26 account and I've opened a new account to create and edit legally, I accept the mistake and promise that I will never repeat a mistake next time and I will be very take care in the futureAdope266 (talk) 9:35 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Looks more like you created a new account to evade your block. You need to request unblocking via your original account instead of creating a new account and pretending that's OK. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That account is indefinitely blocked for abuse, of course you haven’t used it. You don’t get to make another. Acroterion (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You claim you are a new editor, but that's misleading.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

WP:SOCK fully accept the fault I have made and I am ready from now on to create and edit more carefully unblock and 2nd chance, accept Adope266 (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I admit the mistake and I want one 2nd chance and promise careful creations and edits in the future. Adope266 (talk) 01:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the advice Deepfriedokra gave you? No? You will have to request unblocking via your original account, not this one, and you will need to explain the existence of this block-evading account., as well as address your conduct with the original account that led to your block there - that's the point of asking there. If you post any more unblock request here after being advised of all this, you are liable to lose talkpage access. Acroterion (talk) 01:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aridon Bllaca

The article Aridon Bllaca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSPORT, WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]