Jump to content

User talk:AdhiOK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, AdhiOK, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) 03:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

May 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment (May 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 02:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AdhiOK! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majavah was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is empty.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– Majavah talk · edits 16:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9 Story Home Entertainment (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 18:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warner Bros. Global Kids, Young Adults and Classics (May 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Warner Bros. instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AdhiOK, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

PrussianOwl (talk) 06:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Columbia Tristar Animation Studios, you may be blocked from editing. PrussianOwl (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Street Fighter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How to stop a user from making false edits

[edit]

Is there anyway to stop user 174.253.65.34 from continuing to undo and revert the edits done by many so that the false information he keeps setting it back to can be stopped? This Wiki has been factual and correct for years until now.. but the mad man keeps going in and reverting the page back to false information 2 or 3 times a day now no matter who changes it back and he's been doing it for months.

I am referring to the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warner_Archive_Collection — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:8A20:5530:AC8E:950C:FD47:7B06 (talk) 02:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also sections

[edit]

Is there a particular reason that you keep ignoring the WP:NOTSEEALSO guidelines by adding links that are already used in the Peacock (streaming service) and Paramount+ articles to their "See also" sections? Per the guideline, "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body". It would be easier on all of us if you would stop doing this to any article. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 04:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking somebody else's sandbox

[edit]

Why would you blank User:Erry query/sandbox? What is wrong with it? Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hakken. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fortnite Creative, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hakken (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Uncle Dick. I noticed that you recently removed content from News Corporation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Uncle Dick (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:MotorStorm, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 06:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify this for you. Codemasters did not buy Evolution Studios, they only hired the staff. Codemasters does not own Evolution Therefore Electronic Arts doesn't. Evolution is closed but still 100% owned by Sony. It was misreported by a number of news outlets at the time, but Codemasters are on record (see article) explicitly stating that they only hired the staff. - X201 (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warner Bros. Global Kids, Young Adults and Classics has been accepted

[edit]
Warner Bros. Global Kids, Young Adults and Classics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful

[edit]

Your editing at TvOne (Indonesian TV network) and ANTV are borderline edit warring (see Wikipedia:Edit warring). I'm bringing this up in order to help you avoid problems. I see that you are reverting an IP that is insistent on their version of the content. The proper way to combat this is to discuss the alternatives on the article talk page and determine what the consensus version is. Having reliable sources (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources) that support your content is going to make a lot of difference in talk page discussion. I fully understand from past experience that on occasion people making edits are doing so with less than honorable intentions. Nevertheless, one must make an effort at discussion so that, hopefully, the other party will respond positively and the project can benefit. Consider neutrally worded messages to any Wikiprojects that are listed on the articles' talk pages to bring more editors to the discussion. Always make an effort to avoid the problems described at Wikipedia:Canvassing when leaving requests for help. Let me know if you have any questions. Tiderolls 15:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm GPL93. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:14.1.217.198 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 19:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. GPL93 (talk) 19:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz Read! Talk! 19:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdhiOK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is wrong and unfairly.... I only hate anyone adding any fake news on Wikipedia

Decline reason:

You added a vulgarity laden post on an IP user talk page; this violates WP:CIVIL and means that the block is correct. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Zsukiman that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AdhiOK, furthermore, I have reverted a number of edits you made that were reverting Zsukiman. When reverting an edit that is not clearly vandalism (which these edits weren't), please use a clear edit summary. Otherwise, other editors have no idea whether you were right or wrong to revert. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 05:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

I'm removing the final warning because, quite frankly, I can't tell what's going on at that page. But removing mass blocks of content without explanation doesn't work here. Please start leaving edit summaries and communicating with other editors. Thank you, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:53, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AdhiOK, I just saw this pop up on my watchlist, and realized I have this page watchlisted because I gave you a similar bit of advice in the above section. So to reiterate, please use summaries when reverting edits that aren't vandalism. It saves everyone else a lot of time trying to figure out why you made a revert. If you continue to not use an edit summary during reverts, this can be seen as disruptive editing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Dragan Andrić without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Allahabad#RFC - Discussion about name change of the article. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello AdhiOK. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Jaring Data Interaktif, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AdhiOK. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AdhiOK|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creepTalk 20:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jakarta Stock Exchange bombing, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Davidelit (Talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from JalenFolf

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § Icecreamland and disruptive unsourced editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liga 2 (Indonesia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 08:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are You Indonesian?

[edit]

Are You Indonesian? RickRalli Backup (talk) 12:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm Indonesian.... AdhiOK (talk) 16:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removing talk page messages is fine

[edit]

Hi AdhiOK, removing talk page messages, including block notifications, from one's own talk page is fine. The exception at WP:UP#CMT is about declined unblock requests of a still-active block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is, for example, about Special:Diff/1067231406. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polytron (electronics) (January 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nyanardsan were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nyanardsan (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TUDN (brand), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wade Davis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IDX Channel (March 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of the content is unsupported by referencing — where is the information coming from? --
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Paramount Global Content Licensing. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stay civil in edit summaries

[edit]

The situation at Paramount Global Content Licensing got brought to my attention in part because of this edit summary of yours. You should invite the user to discuss the situation at the talk page and do so civilly. (Also, heads-up, there's a WP:Administrators' noticeboard/incidents thread about it.) —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Paramount Global Content Licensing. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Broken

[edit]

Given much of your recent edits, I think you should read and be aware of WP:NOTBROKEN with regards to links. Canterbury Tail talk 15:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Putting back Foxtel Group site

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foxtel&type=revision&diff=1078934094&oldid=1078919298

The Foxtel Group site is the site for the Foxtel company, which is what the Wiki page is about. Foxtel is one of the company's brands.

I've added the link back. --202.56.44.51 (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful

[edit]

Please be careful of using edit summaries like "SHUT UP". I understand it's easy to get frustrated with problem users, but we need to remain civil. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 19:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Canterbury Tail 192.76.8.70 AdhiOK (talk) 19:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is that supposed to mean something? BilCat (talk) 19:26, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, users are allowed to remove warnings. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They've been told that before on this talk page, along with a warning on being civil in edit summaries from User:C.Fred. Yet their behavior doesn't seem to be improving at all. BilCat (talk) 20:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. AdhiOK, you really need to straighten out your conduct and not worry about other peoples. You are perilously close to a block. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally you really, really need to read WP:VANDALISM and especially WP:NOTVANDALISM to learn what vandalism is. If you continue to call other editors edits vandalism, when they're clearly good faith edits, you will be blocked. Canterbury Tail talk 13:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

re: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1093#Paramount Global Content Licensing

[edit]
I agree with my illustrious multinational vegetable friend above. They exhibit massive OWN behaviours and do everything they accuse others of doing, adding info without sources, random changes, and now hoax accusations which they clearly don’t know the meaning of. I’m down for an indefinite so they have to communicate and explain to the community why they should be allowed to have their editing privileges back. Canterbury Tail talk 11:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In fact since they’re still continuing I’ve gone ahead and done it. Canterbury Tail talk 11:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When I spoke of time to reflect, I meant more than 20 minutes. More like six months. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Rodrigo franck, you may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know, I just got frustrated with him because he neglecting those warning for him.... AdhiOK (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The irony is astounding. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Irony is so ironic." BilCat (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Until you can demonstrate to the community in an unblock request why you should have editing privileges on Wikipedia, with your disruption, ignoring warnings, accusing others of vandalism and hoaxes, making unsourced edits (and then reverting other editors good faith unsourced edits for being unsourced) OWN behaviour, and a sheer lack of competence and respect for other editors and our policies and more, you are blocked from editing. I suggest you think long and hard about how you’re going to phrase your unblock request. Canterbury Tail talk 11:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdhiOK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I wouldn't do it again....

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well if that’s your definition of having thought long and hard, this will be short. Canterbury Tail talk 12:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdhiOK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is incorrect.... I've just got been frustrated by another problem users like me which you've been accusing.... And don't forget I've also making any useful contributions on several articles in Wikipedia.....

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AdhiOK (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polytron (electronics) (April 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: adverrtising. Do not resubmit.
DGG ( talk ) 07:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AdhiOK. Thank you. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 02:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/120.188.37.200

[edit]

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/120.188.37.200, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/120.188.37.200 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/120.188.37.200 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IDX Channel (June 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are press releases.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AdhiOK&oldid=1221946408"