User talk:Ad Meliora

Would like to contact me? Great! Click here to start a message.

Pun Generator

They found a hole in the wall of the women's soccer team changing rooms. The police are looking into it.

Welcome

Hello, Ad Meliora, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Ad Meliora, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 13:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ElHef Ad Meliora (talk) 14:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ad Meliora. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 19:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Ad Meliora! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:33, Friday, October 2, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
20	Air Liberté (talk)	Add sources
11,921	Ottoman Empire (talk)	Add sources
6,543	Industrial Revolution (talk)	Add sources
100	Acousto-optic modulator (talk)	Add sources
23	AOM French Airlines (talk)	Add sources
16	R-16 Korea (talk)	Add sources
329	Josef Hassid (talk)	Cleanup
22	Quicklaw (talk)	Cleanup
603	IMG (company) (talk)	Cleanup
33	Charles Auguste de Bériot (talk)	Expand
32	Copyright policies of academic publishers (talk)	Expand
2,386	Reformation (talk)	Expand
260	Middle East Airlines (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
438	Academy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,841	History of slavery (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,475	Transhumanism (talk)	Merge
14	Breed type (talk)	Merge
57	Breed standard (talk)	Merge
167	Conductive hearing loss (talk)	Wikify
982	Security clearance (talk)	Wikify
3	Jean-Charles Corbet (talk)	Wikify
3	Katherine Klein (talk)	Orphan
2	Ann Buchholtz (talk)	Orphan
3	Beloretsk Iron and Steel Works (talk)	Orphan
2	Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming (talk)	Stub
263	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
2	Avatar Orchestra Metaverse (talk)	Stub
28	Authigenesis (talk)	Stub
4	Carliss Baldwin (talk)	Stub
3	Associate-O-Matic (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ad Meliora! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Rename articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Majid Ali Jaunpuri

Discussions about scholars or academics which fall under WP:PROF are actually trickier than usual to assess — PROF allows for the conferral of notability on standards quite different from the depth of coverage about the person, such as how widely cited they are in other works by their peers or followers. So I actually try not to weigh in on PROF discussions very much, to be honest, because in that field a person can attain notability without technically having any of the kind of in-depth sources I would look for in an article about a writer or an actor or a musician or a film director. It's not that your standards are necessarily wrong in principle — for most articles about people, we do require sources that analyze or write about the person in more depth — but when it comes to academics in particular, that kind of sourcing isn't always available at all so the notability standards are designed to assess the impact of their work rather than the presence or absence of biographical literature. Bearcat (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Bearcat, this is very helpful. — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 15:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trond Kvist moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Trond Kvist, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Torstein Grude moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Torstein Grude, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Mccapra. As the edit summary says, I was just seeding the page, with an intention to return over the weekend with more content and citations. But starting in Draft space is a better way to go about it — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 19:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Lessons moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Russian Lessons, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ad Meliora! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Request AfD / WP:SIGCOV advice, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfCs

Hi, generally an WP:RfC is opened to get official consensus on a specific question that has been generally discussed. You're probably going to get some criticism for poorly-formed RfCs. A good RfC opens with a succinct, neutral question. Look at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All and notice how the RfCs are worded. Yours are more "I'd like to talk about this with other editors", which isn't really how RfCs are used. Personally, I suggest you remove the RfC trappings and just start discussions. Schazjmd (talk) 21:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about First Lady and Second Gentleman-designate titles in infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff

Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the invite cookie monster. — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 17:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Trond Kvist

Hello, Ad Meliora. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Trond Kvist, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Torstein Grude

Hello, Ad Meliora. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Torstein Grude, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Russian Lessons

Hello, Ad Meliora. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Russian Lessons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Torstein Grude

Hello, Ad Meliora. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Torstein Grude".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Trond Kvist

Hello, Ad Meliora. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trond Kvist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Russian Lessons

Hello, Ad Meliora. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Russian Lessons".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]