User talk:Abspayasi

Proposed deletion of Payasi Surname

Hello, Abspayasi. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Payasi Surname, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 04:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shahdol has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shahdol was changed by Abspayasi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952031 on 2017-02-08T02:29:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jolly LLB 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] As of this note, the Bollywood Hungama reference indicates 44.36 crore rupees, not 49.52. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anaarkali of Aaraah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anaarkali of Aaraah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BOVINEBOY2008 15:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jolly LLB 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [2] References belong inline in articles, not pasted into edit summaries, as readers would only be expected to find a reference by looking at the bottom of the article. Additionally, Koimoi is not considered a reliable source by the Indian cinema task force at Wikipedia. Please see WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing here and in a number of your edits. But this is sort of a moot point in this instance, because the quality of the source is also an issue. We don't use blogs or other faceless sites, since anyone can start a website and print whatever they want. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy (i.e. well established news sites, magazines, books) have to say about anything. Please see our guidelines on user-generated content. Other examples of insufficient sources: blogs, discussion forums, unverified Twitter accounts, IMDb, and even Wikipedia itself. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nidhi Bisht

The article Nidhi Bisht has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability not established by enough reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 21:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]