User talk:Ababio70

Welcome!

Hello, Ababio70, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 15:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful making spelling and grammar corrections

Hi there,

I monitor the American Autocross article. I saw that you changed "motorsport" to "motor sport" -- the former is correct, and someone reverted your edit shortly after you made it.

I reviewed the edits you made to other articles, and saw that roughly half of them introduced spelling or grammar mistakes, many of which were subsequently reverted.

I appreciate your good-faith efforts to correct mistakes in Wikipedia, but please be extra careful when making spelling or grammar changes, as your success rate has only been so-so.

Thanks! Stephen Hui (talk) 06:58, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. An edit that you recently made to KXGN-TV seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Man O War Nigeria (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Man O War Nigeria may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:54, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ababio70! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:54, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Harsh 2580. An edit you recently made to 1918 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Harsh 02:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image additions

Please make sure images you add:

Does not already exist in the article; you have added duplicate images to many articles.
Have captions that explain what the image consists of.
Are placed somewhere in the article where it is relevant to the subject and enhances the reader's understanding. Images should not just be randomly placed at the very top of an article.

~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding duplicate images and nonsensical captions!!!

One would think you might have picked up something from the feedback you received on on your first round of image additions, almost all of which have been reverted. But apparently you haven't - the first four I looked at were three duplicates of images already in the article, and one lazy nonsensical caption. I'm going through your current spate and reverting these pointless, make-work additions. Stop this! It is not helpful, and Wikipedia is not a platform for generating competition points for you. Continued addition of unsuitable images will get you blocked. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ignoring the above warning messages and continuing to add irrelevant and duplicate images to articles.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 00:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize for my wrongs in duplicating pictures twice and adding lazy captions to articles. I will do well by being cautious of my contributions and editing of articles. Please, kindly unblock me. Ababio70 (talk) 01:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me. I will take to correction Ababio70 (talk) 01:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ababio70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I now understand what I'm blocked for, i will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions insteadAbabio70 (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ababio70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for making distruptive edits to the English Wikipedia, and I now understand my mistakes and promise never to do that again. I have been briefed by a leader in my community, I was relatively inexperiencedAbabio70 (talk) 14:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request is not specific enough. Please say exactly why you think you were blocked, and exactly how you will change your behavior going forward. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

+image #WPWP #WPWPUIL

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ababio70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realised that my account was blocked because I've made disruptive edits by adding wrong images, images of low quality and adding pictures to wrong places within the article. Going forward, I will ensure I follow the guidelines by adding appropriate high quality images to articles and the caption to the right places within the articlesAbabio70 (talk) 15:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've identified what you've done wrong, but you seem to be asking us to just trust you that you won't do it again going forward; that is insufficient. It might help if you identified things you wanted to do other than adding images. I'll give you one more chance to write an acceptable unblock request, I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deny. @Yamla and CaptainEek: Ababio70 is disruptive and his talk page access should be revoked. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ababio70, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 11:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THE 2020 AFROCINE NIGERIA CONTEST

Greetings Ababio70!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. The Nigerian contest is focusing on the 3 Nigerian languages Wikipedia (Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba) and the English Wikipedia.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participant's section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st Prize - HP 255 G7 AMD Dual Core 4GB RAM 500GB HDD 15.6-Inch Windows 10 Laptop + Bag
- 2nd Prize - Nokia 6.1 Plus - 5.8-Inch (4GB, 64GB ROM) 16MP + 16MP, Dual Sim, 4G Smartphone
- 3rd Prize - Western Digital 1TB External Hard Drive
Diversity Winner - Creating articles for the highest number of countries.

Zealot H6 Waterproof Bluetooth Earphone Stereo Wireless Headphone

Gender-gap Filler - creating the highest number of articles about women.

Zealot H6 Waterproof Bluetooth Earphone Stereo Wireless Headphone

We would be adding additional Information as the contest progresses, along with local training in Nigerian languages Wikipedia. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Haylad (talk) 12:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]