User talk:Aarondude
It's good practice to only remove maintenance tags when the issue in question has been fixed. The article is not properly cited, and putting a URL at the bottom of the page doesn't really change that. Have a look at WP:ATT, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:FOOT and WP:CITE to help you. Drop me a line if you want further advice, and I can help you out some time tomorrow. Adrian M. H. 22:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Ambiguous link
[edit]Thank you for your recent edit to Harold Whitehead. Your edit included one or more links to the page English, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to Harold Whitehead to refer directly to the most relevant topic. (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) --Russ (talk) 19:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Deleting?
[edit]I saw you had blanked the page for Frank DeSimone II. I'm wondering if I have made a mistake, because you have apparently made another page that's a duplicate of it. I think you should list a page for deletion if you need to delete it though. Don't blank pages :D. Jack 00:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Francesco DeSimone
[edit]A tag has been placed on Francesco DeSimone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wikiman53 t a 00:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Attack
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by GregorB (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Diamonds relation
[edit]Have restored the disputed edit but added {{fact}}. Preferable to removing everything related to so far unsourced relation between the two, which I did at first do, having forgotten the alternative. Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Joe DiStefano.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Joe DiStefano.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]July 2007
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, your recent edits to Frank Vincent have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Philip Trueman 15:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Phillip Giaccone
[edit]I have nominated Phillip Giaccone, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Giaccone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Roleplayer (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Francesco DeLucia
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Francesco DeLucia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cheers, CP 03:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
The article Remo (mobster) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non-notable person only known from being mentioned in a single book
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Louis Facciolo for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Facciolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Star Mississippi 15:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
The article The Plaza Suite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is completely unsourced and there's no evidence of notability for this establishment. All sources I can find through Google, Newspapers.com, etc. make trivial mentions only.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Complex/Rational 14:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)