User talk:Aaintagent

This is Aaintagent's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexandria Altman (July 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aaintagent. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Alexandria Altman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aaintagent! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 12:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aaintagent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

millmill (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hi, I am only very new to this and learning and am used to writing the way I have. I in no way receive any compensation for my writing and did not mean for it to come off as promotional. I was trying to add more notable content? I can change whatever is needed and apologise immensly

Decline reason:

Some of the things you have said seem believable, some don't, and at least one of them is obviously untrue; but it doesn't really matter, because the outcome would be the same whether I believed every word of what you wrote or none of it. It doesn't even matter all that much that you have been editing contrary to the conflict of interest guidelines, the policy on promotional editing, and the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use, because again the outcome would be the same if that weren't so. The only thing that really matters is that you are clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia, and unblocking you would not benefit the encyclopaedia. If you wish to carry on writing sycophantic marketing copy to promote yourself, your friend, or your client (it absolutely doesn't matter which) then you can do so as much as you like, but not on Wikipedia, because that isn't what Wikipedia is for. JBW (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 (Aaintagent (talk) 13:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

You describe random that you don't know as a "visionary and seer"? I kind of doubt that. Also, who are:

Pamgalactic (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Awagent (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Alexandria Altman A (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Alexandria Altman -Author-producer (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Do you have some kind of business relationship with Alexandria Altman? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do know Alexandria Altman and do work with her but in an unpaid role at present. Those accounts are mine as I cannot see where to delete an account and forgot my password.

If I cannot make the page fair enough but I am only just learning Wikipedia.

Thank you

(Aaintagent (talk) 13:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Can you please remove those accounts?

Thank you.

Apologies for being scattered due to being newbie at this.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexandria Altman (July 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Theroadislong

Can someone please delete my other accounts and this Alexandria Altman article I started. I think I will study a bit more and learn a bit more before going any further.

Sorry for any inconvenience.

He aint heavy ...

(Aaintagent (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Accounts cannot be deleted; just stop using them(or if you couldn't log in, just forget about them). 331dot (talk) 18:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aaintagent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request JBW (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Apologies again if this is the wrong place. I think I have only just found out what sock puppetry is I believe? More than one account on an ip address after a block? I do not gain any financial benefit for my articles and am voluntary writer at this stage. I do however, know the person I am writing about very well. Is it better to just wait for someone else to do the article? (if anyone does) or what would I need to remove to make it allowable to publish. Thank you for your help and consideration in this matter.

Pamela Wohlsen International Agent for Alexandria Altman Owner/Partner AW Agency www.awagencymgt.com admin@awagencymgt.com

Aaintagent (Aaintagent (talk) 08:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)).[reply]