User talk:AMB03

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Matt Ball has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Cockney constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. The Helpful One ^(Review) 20:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cockney. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Will ^(talk) 20:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vernon Kay, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Vernon Kay was changed by AMB03 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-04T20:40:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Fabien Bull"

A page you created, Fabien Bull, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Test pages.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fabien Bull

A tag has been placed on Fabien Bull requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RT | Talk 21:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fabien Bull

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Fabien Bull, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ni mi Ti ze 21:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf⁴² 12:57, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Lemon, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 10:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Cruise, you will be blocked from editing. Stephenb (Talk) 10:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]