User talk:81.106.30.36

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

March 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dustin Hoffman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 02:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Daniel Craig. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Vandalism warning

If you vandalize one more article I will seek to have this IP blocked indefinitely. Quis separabit? 17:28, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello. An edit that you recently made to Jeffrey Tambor seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 17:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Look dont take this personaly im not vandalising anything im correcting the info now DONT (for F*ck sake) DONT think im vandalising pages im correcting them!!!~~~~}}

. Katie^talk 18:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2016

There has been a response to your request at Talk:Martin Freeman. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 21:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wait i have something that you will need!!!

There is another troll that has the ip address of "73.97.195.101" he is another troll like me whenever i put in "nationality = British" he will change it to "nationality = English" to annoy me because he knows that it is annoying me.

Block me if you so desire to but can you at least block user "73.97.195.101" because we need to block him!

So can you please block him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.30.36 (talk • contribs) 12:43, June 2, 2016‎

July 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Matt Lucas.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 21:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Woody Allen, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 21:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fight Club, you may be blocked from editing. O1lI0 (talk) 11:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 16:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I understand 81.106.30.36 (talk) 08:55, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. JC7V-constructive zone 22:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Slumdog Millionaire. Jim1138 (talk) 07:21, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But it is not an American film81.106.30.36 (talk) 07:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn of the Dead

It would appear to be British per https://www.comedy.co.uk/film/shaun_of_the_dead/. Jim1138 (talk) 10:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I am sorry 81.106.30.36 (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You need to highlight and copy the request template while viewing this page, and then paste it into the edit window, to make a proper request. 331dot (talk) 11:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.30.36 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

BUT I FINISHED MY YEARLY BLOCK! I WAITED A WHOLE YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!! UNTIL OCTOBER THE 15TH 2018!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.30.36 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I just want to make good edits and I waited the whole year. 81.106.30.36 (talk) 10:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 10:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.30.36 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because my yearly block ended on the 15th October 2018, why am I still blocked? 81.106.30.36 (talk) 10:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You may have "done your time", but I don't see that you learned and that your editing now was any less disruptive than a year ago. Block evasion of course is itself grounds for a block. Huon (talk) 17:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please copy and paste your requests outside the template, not within the template. 331dot (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The block log indicates the time and reason for your block. You were reblocked on the 20th for block evasion. 331dot (talk) 11:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your request will not display properly and not be reviewed unless you highlight and copy the template when viewing this page, then open the edit window and paste it. If you just overwrite the text in the template, it will not display properly. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.

Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK.

I am sorry.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.30.36 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I have edit's that if you let me say each of them one by one, then we can resolve what is going on. Before this, I wasn't willing to have a rational conversation about this, but now I am.

Decline reason:

Great Ghu! Rational discussion? Looks like you've been abusing Wikipedia for years. You'll need to identify where you went wrong and what you will do instead. That's as rational as I can be. Yes, please do explicate the last ten of your edits. Or more. Please describe what constructive edits you'd make.-- Deep fried okra 17:35, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But I am willing to speak now.81.106.30.36 (talk) 17:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.30.36 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't exactly remember where I went wrong, but overtime, I have learn't to make edits better. The problem is that I have not shown you guys that. If you want me to explain an edit, then please ask me an edit and I will tell you. If you really want to know where I went wrong, then it was back in either 2015 or 2016. That is the best I can give you.

Decline reason:

This is a check user block so only a CU can unblock you. That said your record is one of unrelenting disruption going back years, including block evasion. Frankly I am astonished that you were only blocked for a year. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you have any other accounts? SQL ^{Query me!} 23:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No81.106.30.36 (talk) 09:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken some time off to get this right.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.106.30.36 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block log goes back as far as 2015 for what I can remember. Now let me explain 2 of my edits. Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. I have been trying to add that per WP:WEIGHT they should be British-French co-productions and the USA is wrong.

Decline reason:

You are clearly just wasting our time now. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 11:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.