Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, c-73-220-163-13.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (73.220.163.13), is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Comcast Cable. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register).

Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

October 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cellular (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cellular (film) was changed by 73.220.163.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954061 on 2016-10-31T06:08:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to I Know What You Did Last Summer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: I Know What You Did Last Summer was changed by 73.220.163.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884055 on 2016-11-30T07:05:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ClueBot is a piece of software that detects and reverts what it scores as likely damaging edits. A human editor would also have reverted your additions, because they seemed to be just stating your own thoughts about how the plot was designed. But Wikipedia articles are not places for general discussion. What is wanted is factual information, and the only opinions to include are published reviews supported by references to show where they were published. So if you could try to stick to facts and published opinions, you are very welcome to carry on contributing to our articles about films: Noyster (talk), 10:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the I Know What You Did Last Summer plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Aaytha Ezhuthu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aaytha Ezhuthu was changed by 73.220.163.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89234 on 2016-12-25T02:27:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inba is an evil character who gets on everyone's nerves. It is true that Michael wanted revenge on Inba.(73.220.163.13 (talk) 02:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)).[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Departed— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe _talk 00:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Jac16888 ^Talk 00:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I should've done this years ago. It's true that Queenan's dumb in Departed film, so why can't you accept my edits?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 00:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Am I going to get unblocked? Yes or No

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(73.220.163.13 (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I got Blocked for Disrupting, I won't do it again please.(73.220.163.13 (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC

Decline reason:

You have two choices; wait for the block to expire in January, or create an account. As we cannot tell whose fingers are on the keyboard these are the only options you have.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)))[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

My computer is refusing to create an account, so please allow me to create an account? (73.220.163.13 (talk) 00:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

You cannot create an account yourself, but you can request an account to be created for you. Huon (talk) 01:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I was told that I was going to get a password few days ago for Wikipedia account, but nothing's happening, so please find a way to let me edit Wikipedia?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 23:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

Please read Huon's comments above. You're blocked and circumventing it would be against our blocking policy. Also, please use the unblock template, not the helpme template for unblock requests. DrStrauss talk 10:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

new account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Huon lied to me that I was able to get an account of username. Please unblock me (73.220.163.13 (talk) 10:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

Decline reason:

Personal attacks on other editors won't get you unblocked. It's becoming increasingly clear that you are incapable of editing in a collaborative environment like Wikipedia. Further pointless or abusive requests will result in your talk page access being revoked. Favonian (talk) 10:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jac16888 ^Talk 22:38, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Heyyyyyyy I never got a Warning about Being blocked Again? Unblock me Now.

Decline reason:

We are under no obligation to warn you - the previous series of blocks should have sufficed to indicate that what you were doing was not permitted. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

elsewhere

There's probably a group on Reddit that would be happy to discuss movie plots with you. —Tamfang (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jac16888 ^Talk 16:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nobody posted a Warning that this IP would be blocked???? (73.220.163.13 (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

Decline reason:

No warnings are required; the other notices on this page should have been sufficient. As you have not addressed the reason for the block, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.