Jump to content

User talk:71.83.0.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Robert Yates (politician). However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Iohannes Animosus (talk) 18:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Air Jordan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page IHOP. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Agricultural science. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lech Wałęsa, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lech Wałęsa was changed by 71.83.0.2 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-07T18:28:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Aircraft has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. intraining Jack In 12:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I've blocked this IP from editing for a time, owing to vandalism. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Medical cannabis, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Medical cannabis was changed by 71.83.0.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-05-04T14:24:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Medical cannabis. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ottawa4ever (talk) 14:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gabriel Iglesias, you may be blocked from editing. Lova Falk (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Gabriel Iglesias. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Uncle Dick (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

NawlinWiki (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dingo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing That Should Not Be (talk) 12:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Protestant Reformation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 17:47, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Middle Colonies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lech Wałęsa, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 22:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

February 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bad Belzig, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Voting, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

April 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Spiny lobster, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. ScottSteiner 16:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cadillac High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox 13:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Buccinator muscle with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 15:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Irony, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

September 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Carlos Santana, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Santana with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Santana, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Carlos Santana. Bentogoa (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to I'm Awesome with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 16:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This IP has been blocked again owing to vandalism-only edits. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

December 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Brookie. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 1840 because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 15:53, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 15:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Baden-Württemberg has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brandenburg with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (tJosve05a (c) 17:07, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Baden-Württemberg with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. (tJosve05a (c) 17:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Brandon Richards. (tJosve05a (c) 17:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Washington Monument has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Mark David Chapman has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to List of proteins has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to New York and New Jersey campaign has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New York and New Jersey campaign with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 14:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Electric charge has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Electric charge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pepper. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Air mass— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. "Pepper" @ 16:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Colter—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cadillac Area Public Schools. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Uranium Site (talk) 17:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cadillac Area Public Schools, you may be blocked from editing. Uranium Site (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Read

[edit]

The fundamental principles of Wikipedia may be summarized in five "pillars":

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia

Wikipedia combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a social network, a vanity press, an experiment in anarchy or democracy, an indiscriminate collection of information, nor a web directory. It is not a dictionary, a newspaper, nor a collection of source documents, although some of its fellow Wikimedia projects are.

Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view

We strive for articles with an impartial tone that document and explain major points of view, giving due weight for their prominence. We avoid advocacy, and we characterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas there may be just one well-recognized point of view; in others we describe multiple points of view, presenting each accurately and in context rather than as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy with citations based on reliable sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is about a living person. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute

All editors freely license their work to the public, and no editor owns an article – any contributions can and may be mercilessly edited and redistributed. Respect copyright laws and never plagiarize from any sources. Borrowing non-free media is sometimes allowed as fair use, but editors should strive to find free alternatives first.

Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility

Respect your fellow Wikipedians, even when you disagree. Apply Wikipedia etiquette, and do not engage in personal attacks or edit wars. Seek consensus, and never disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Act in good faith, and assume good faith on the part of others. Be open and welcoming to newcomers. Should conflicts arise, discuss them calmly on the appropriate talk pages, follow dispute resolution procedures, and consider that there are 6,918,094 other articles on the English Wikipedia to improve and discuss.

Wikipedia has no firm rules

Wikipedia has policies and guidelines, but they are not carved in stone; their content and interpretation can evolve over time. The principles and spirit matter more than literal wording, and sometimes improving Wikipedia requires making exceptions. Be bold, but not reckless, in updating articles. And do not agonize over making mistakes: they can be corrected easily because (almost) every past version of each article is saved.