User talk:70.49.242.196

Attention:

This IP address, 70.49.242.196, is registered to Bell Canada, and may be shared by multiple users. In the case of organizations using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.

IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

CE or AD

The article has always used CE ("Common Era"). It is the same as AD. Do not change it back or your edits will be considered vandalism.(Ghostexorcist 18:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

It has nothing to do with stupidity my friend. This article uses CE and not AD. (Ghostexorcist 19:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Your reversion of the dating coupled with your obscene comment in the edit summary are such that you may well be blocked if you continue in them. Please desist in making changes without prior consensus. Continuation of such behavior will result in your being blocked. John Carter 19:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Zhou Tong (archer), you will be blocked from editing. John Carter 19:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has everything to do with stupidity. The gross stupidity of anyone who would use the BCE/CE system. It has nothing to do with religion for me. I am not a believer. Come up with a system which truly does away with religion and I would love to use it. Until then, no. You must have been out taking a leak when they were giving out brains. 70.49.242.196 19:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then CE is the way to go. --Ghostexorcist 19:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. You are dumb. You really don't see it? I mean, really? I can't believe that. Not even of you. 70.49.242.196 20:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zhou Tong (archer)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Zhou Tong (archer). Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Owen× ☎ 19:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have in fact already broken it. John Carter 19:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A long time ago. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you, John. It's been a while since I've had the pleasure of encountering such a spectacularly ignorant, almost superhumanly stupid person. Only a few - like Owenx above - make it into such an elite group. You should feel honored. 70.49.242.196 19:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Owen× ☎ 20:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Owenx, you are so gay! 70.49.243.28 20:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours for attempting to use a sockpuppet (70.49.243.28) to evade a block for a three-revert rule violation. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case 20:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With every sockpuppet you try to use, the original block will be lengthened. Daniel Case 20:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.