User talk:68.224.117.152

{{helpme|Please tell ArbCom because they seem to not have received the above email. I am appealing. --Ionas}}

The ArbCom members have been informed of this message on their respective talk pages. Please do not re-add the {{helpme}} tag. ArbCom will contact you. --omtay38 02:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. --68.224.117.152 (talk) 02:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Can an arbitrator please respond to this: I have sent the following E-mail to the Arbitration Committee and they have not responded, see the date the mail was sent. The arbitrators either: do not read emails, refused to read mine, or have not got it yet. Now I will WP:AGF that they have not received my email, so I will post it here:

I am User:Ionas68224, and known on IRC as Ionas_Freeman. I have had a 
terrible history here, one that I won't go into great detail about. If you 
don't know, you can review 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ionas68224 or 
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ionas68224 for the 
history. I would like to appeal my block, or what Ryulong and someone named 
"Ryanpostlethwait" on IRC (presumably User:Ryan_Postlethwaite) call a ban 
(even though I am not on LOBU and only they have called it a ban).

I was previously a dick (after I was a vandal), and quite mean, not assuming 
good faith with vandals and basically unsympathetic as User:bibliotheque on 
English Wikipedia and kind of chatty on the Simple English Wikipedia. I then 
felt that I should change my en.wp name to match my simple.wp name, 
Ionas68224. And so I did. Then, I had made a comment saying on Ryulong 
(someone who I'd never met since then)'s RFC saying that he should be 
desysopped for his meanness, and people ganged up on me saying I had only 
been there 30 days, then saying that it was trolling, and even went so far 
to go that I was a terrible criminal for being on a B.A.D.S.I.T.E. 
wikipediareview, and for supporting Daniel Brandt.

So, now I realise that Daniel is quite a mean person, using the law to 
intimidate people like Phaedriel after finding his old Wikipedia Review 
posts outing on WR that a certain editor was transsexual, revealing the real 
identity of Katefan0, and Phaedriel. Accuising one of our nicest Wikipedians 
of being a felon when I think he was actually doing something to "harass and 
annoy" Phaedriel, and I have concluded that since his threats never really 
turn into real lawsuits, he does it to feel proud of hisself.
----

So anyway, I want to contribute constructively under a new account. I will go
under a conditional: If I am allowed back on, I will 
be blocked for up to a week, then, well, you know the rest (in the ARBCOM 
tradition) if I:

a)harass users
b)make mamy personal attacks after being warned
c)am disruptive after being warned, or
d)attack Ryulong (no warning needed)

Is this something we can agree on?

Ionas

---

I'm afraid that, having discussed your case, the Committee has declined to unban you.

James F. (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

---