User talk:67.231.162.127

October 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Machine gun. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 420 (number) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 420 (number) was changed by 67.231.162.127 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96657 on 2022-02-19T23:00:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Global Warming (Pitbull album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Capitalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm BilCat. An edit that you recently made to General Dynamics Griffin seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BilCat (talk) 18:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022

Hello, I'm Silikonz-alt. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tatra 603—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Silikonz (alt)💬 21:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Zsohl. An edit you recently made to Fanta seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zsohl ^(Talk) 12:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Subculture. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 22:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2023

Hello, I'm Rjjiii. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Slim Shady EP have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ(talk) 03:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 00:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

67.231.162.127 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have barely made any disruptive editing at all in the past year prior to this ban, also none of my edits is even considered disruptive editing except for the (obviously) trolling stuff i did 2-3 years ago. i stopped trolling wikipedia years ago, this is a wayy too harsh ban that is highly innacurate, as i have done nothing that could be classed as "disruptive editing" since late 2022. This isnt "long-term disruptive editing" this is someone who has barely made any wikipedia edits. 67.231.162.127 (talk) 22:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Some of the edit summaries from October were clearly disruptive. As you see nothing wrong with them, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 12:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

67.231.162.127 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what kinda edits did i make in october? I dont remember. It dosent say what i done. I dont even know what your talking about. It dosent even list the edits ive made in october. I dont know what the hell your talking about. Also, 2 years is too harsh. Atleast list the edits ive made in october, gheez. I dont even know the edits ive made AT ALL. Edit:ive seen the edits ive made, and they were stupid. I was kinda stupid back in october Now could i please be unblocked? I do see something wrong with those edits. I just forgot they even existed. I hope this is a valid reason for the unblock because im starting to hate wikipedia a bit due to its blocking. I needed to add more information to alot of articles but could'nt due to this block. 67.231.162.127 (talk) 02:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

How were your edits "stupid"? Without knowing this, there's a chance that you could repeat those same issues. Your attitude here also tells me that unblocking you would be a net negative for the project. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.