User talk:5Traveler

5Traveler, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 5Traveler! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Vitaly Tepikin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vitaly Tepikin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Better refs needed

Your refs in the draft are to content written BY Tepikin. His books can be listed in a Bibliography section. Refs not needed there. What is essentially needed is referenced content written ABOUT Tepikin. David notMD (talk) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did some copyediting of text and removed the refs that were confirmations of his books. Refs needed about him. David notMD (talk) 18:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vitaly Tepikin (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The large majority of this draft is totally unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vitaly Tepikin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vitaly Tepikin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 5Traveler. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 14:03, 3 February 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, 5Traveler, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 14:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More not better

I am completely unfamiliar with literature on Russian intelligentsia (or any other intelligentsia), so my only advice will be from perspective of being at Wikipedia for a while. For your article to succeed you need at least three references to published articles that are ABOUT Tepikin. Much of what you are filling the draft with does not help, and only annoys any reviewer/editor. Think shorter. This is radical, but the entire Theses section is of no help at all. When I read it, I can not understand how it relates to Tepikin. And it is not referenced. Likewise, the Links section is of no benefit, and should be deleted. Articles VVT has published could be added to the section that was Books, now Bibliography. This type of content does not convey notability in the Wikipedia sense, but it is allowed. Do not include interviews. All paragraphs in the Biography need at least one reference. If there is no reference, then delete the content, even if it is true. Good luck. I believe VVT is notable enough to justify an article, but it will have to be much more concise to be approved. David notMD (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 5Traveler! You created a thread called Will my first article be approved? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 5Traveler! You created a thread called Is the article correct and submitted correctly? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

advice

I re-reviewed the draft: I work very frequently here with academic articles, including those ofRussian academics, and I do know a little Russian. It does meet our notability standard for WP:CREATIVE and WP:PROF. it just needs some adjustment. . You can see my comments on the draft article. DGG ( talk ) 17:18, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vitaly Tepikin (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hasteur was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vitaly Tepikin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vitaly Tepikin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 23:27, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vitaly Tepikin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vitaly Tepikin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vitaly Tepikin

Hello, 5Traveler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vitaly Tepikin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]