User talk:555randolph

Welcome!

Hello, 555randolph, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like R E Romero -Probst, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 07:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How does X work?

{{helpme}} Your question. --555randolph (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 555randolph. You used the {{helpme}} tag but you did not post a question. Please write out your question and when you are done, place back the tag. I or someone else will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access. Josh Parris 12:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} When you use the helpme tag, please remember to write your question below the tag. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Re-edited Probst page to meet your criteria

We have made several changes to the page including; page clean up, removal of peacock terms, configured a reference box, removed external tags or moved some to their proper 'reference area'. at this point we feel the factual information is not biased. Previously, we had used a similar style from Jeff Probst's page assuming it would be proper for in-depth descriptive language. We feel we have altered that style to a more conservative manner. We feel the work at this stage is accurate and to the point. We hope to further add conservative and proper photographs, articles, references and factual information that will further strengthen this page. Lastly, we added a hangon tag, but in the process of editing, inadvertently removed the speedy delete tag (not realizing what it was) as this is our first attempt at trying to deliver information to wikipedia. (our apologies). In conclusion, these facts are accurate and relevant, and will most certainly adhere to your helpful suggestions. Sincerely, Thank you

Added; help note - footnotes and references question: should every footnote be numbered individually, even if some are from the same source, and must all footnotes have external links? Should we footnote every fact or is a general reference for similar groups of facts acceptable? Please help with your answers and as well, if we need changes allow us time to compile all sources.

We have made several changes to the reference area and will make further additions and/or further changes if necessary

We feel our magazine is is being accurate and responsible in our issuance of facts about RE Romero-Probst void of 'conflict of interest'and hope to contribute other articles and factual information for other people, places and events. (555randolph (talk) 17:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hi 555randolph, and welcome to Wikipedia. You should place these comments on the article's talk page, to inform the editors of that article of your rationale. It's possible that if you place your comments here, they might not be noticed before the page is deleted. You can get to an article's talk page by going to the article and clicking the tab that says "Discussion" "Discuss this page" or "Talk" at the top. Thanks! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 17:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you {{555randolph (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)}} (555randolph (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of R E Romero -Probst

A tag has been placed on R E Romero -Probst requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 07:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article R E Romero -Probst, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of R E Romero-Probst

The article R E Romero-Probst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per WP:NSPORT, WP:AUTHOR and WP:BIO; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 17:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of R E Romero-Probst

I have nominated R E Romero-Probst, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R E Romero-Probst. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MuffledThud (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]