User talk:51.6.138.70

February 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.6.138.70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have obviously not vandalised anything. 51.6.138.70 (talk) 22:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Almost all of your edits recently have been reverted. Pretty clear sign you are being disruptive. Yamla (talk) 22:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.6.138.70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So you didn't even bother to look at a single edit I made, but just concluded that because someone reverted them, they were disruptive? Well, no, a disruptive edit would be something like deliberately introducing factual errors. User:Manticore did that. They are a vandal. They are the scum you need to be blocking. 51.6.138.70 (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing request, remove TPA. 331dot (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vandalism would be something like deliberately introducing factual errors. User:Manticore has now introduced factual errors, grammatical mistakes, and outright nonsense to a series of articles. They are deliberately undermining the integrity of the encyclopaedia. They are a vandal. They are the scum you need to be blocking, if you are here to build an encyclopaedia. 51.6.138.70 (talk) 22:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admins: WP:BANREVERT applies; see also Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. — Manti core 00:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No policy or guideline can possibly justify changing every occurrence of a person's name to something incorrect. But you did that. That is vandalism. You are a vandal. 51.6.138.70 (talk) 00:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.6.138.70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not vandalised anything, ever. All my edits have improved articles. Some of my edits fixed vandalism; putting vandalism right back into articles is itself obviously vandalism. You should block users who vandalise, not users who fix vandalism. 51.6.138.70 (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Removing TPA again. 331dot (talk) 07:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 11:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.6.138.70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Undoing people's good edits for no reason at all is vandalism. All of my edits are good. Anyone who is undoing them is not here to build an encyclopaedia. Anyone who would block me for making these good changes is not here to build an encyclopaedia. You should let competent editors build this encyclopaedia. 51.6.138.70 (talk) 11:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've tried this before. It didn't work before. It didn't work this time, either. Yamla (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 11:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.