Jump to content

User talk:50.75.245.202

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (50.75.245.202) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Heleen Mees has been reverted.
Your edit here to Heleen Mees was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.project-syndicate.org/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heleen Mees -

[edit]

Please stop deleting your year of birth, place of birth and maiden name from the Heleen Mees article.

I see you've already been told this User_talk:Velocitas#Heleen_Mees as far back as May 2013 but continue to delete anyway. 50.74.152.2 (talk) 18:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Heleen

[edit]

What is your objection to:

In March 2014, Mees was sentenced to therapy and if she successfully completes one year of probation, the charges against her will be dropped.[10][11]

That sentence is perfectly backed up by

http://online.wsj.com/article/AP35e7f881be7841169dff04a021abd01a.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/economist-deal-stalking-case-article-1.1716671

50.74.152.2 (talk) 18:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My objection is that there was no trial, there is no verdict, there is no guilty plea and therefore there is no sentencing. Also, there is no probation. The case is adjourned and will be dismissed automatically. Therefore, all charges against Mees are set for dismissal is the right phrase.

Also, you can not cite the ADA's reply to the motion to dismiss as proof of anything, as the ADA is not neutral by any standard.

Furthermore, all the references used are toxic, pointing to the Buiter accusations that have not been proven and that Mees has denied categorically. More neutral references, like Mees' publishing house are called for.

I know people hate Mees, but Wikipedia is not the place to go after her. (comment by IP 50.75.245.202)


"A Dutch academic charged with stalking a prominent economist is poised to get the New York City misdemeanor case dismissed if she goes to therapy and stays out of trouble for a year." from http://online.wsj.com/article/AP35e7f881be7841169dff04a021abd01a.html

"Mees, 44, took a deal that will result in the stalking charge against her being dropped if she stays away from her married ex, Willem Buiter, undergoes 14 counseling sessions and doesn't get arrested" from http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/economist-deal-stalking-case-article-1.1716671

<-- These two sources say that you were sentenced to therapy and if you complete the therapy and one year of probation, they will drop the charges. That's literally what those two sources say. 50.74.152.2 (talk) 19:01, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a lawyer apparently, but for a sentence you need a guilty verdict. Since there is neither a guilty verdict nor a guilty plea, there is no sentence/punishment. There is no probation, there is an adjournment. (comment by IP 50.75.245.202)


You took a plea. Read those sources. You don't seem to understand English very well.50.74.152.2 (talk) 19:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Mees did not take a guilty plea. She did not plead guilty to any of the charges. Mees denies all the accusations.

By the way, none of your sources mentions 'plea.' That's what you make of it in your dreams.(comment by IP 50.75.245.202)


You took a plea. This source says you did:

http://nypost.com/2014/03/10/stalker-ex-nyu-prof-takes-plea-deal-but-plans-defamation-suit/

‘Stalker’ ex-NYU prof takes plea deal, but plans defamation suit

I know English isn't your first language. 50.74.152.2 (talk) 01:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


That NY Post article is dead wrong, as I wrote before, and you only found it because I pointed it out to you. WSJ and NY Daily News don't mention a plea, because Mees did not take a plea.

There was no trial, there is no verdict, there is no guilty plea and therefore there is no sentencing and there is no probation.

Why don't you check the court documents as I did?

Anyway, I doubt further talk will solve this issue between us.

Heleen Mees

[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you've been involved in quite a heavy edit war over Heleen Mees. As a result of this I've blocked both you and the other editor for a short period of time. Please discuss your changes on the talkpage of the article before editing it again, and gain consensus for any further changes. If the edit warring continues once the block is over, it will only result in further blocks and/or the article being protected, making it impossible for either of you to edit it. Bjelleklang - talk 09:36, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Bjelleklang - talk 13:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.
Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 13:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.